Curufinwe
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2013
- 56,994
- 45,414
Look in the mirror to see a miserable .I know you're a flyers fan but you aint half a miserable aren't ya.
Look in the mirror to see a miserable .I know you're a flyers fan but you aint half a miserable aren't ya.
Atkinson as well, since Voracek for Atkinson was simply swapping bad contracts.
That's a Blackhawk fan wish list.
I wonder if that's for his buyout. IIRC, there's a ~600 k credit this year, with that being given back next year.P. Myers to TB. Watch him flourish
Hextall can be blamed for overpaying Voracek, whose contract was so bad Seattle wouldn't touch it.No you cannot blame Hextall for Atkinson. That's ridiculous.
Fletcher tends to grant wishes.
Don't want DeBrincat, much less give up major resources for him, given his salary (present and future)
Scoring 5x5, pp/60:
2.14, 2.36, 1.69, 2.25, 1.86
CF 53.34%, 49.35%, 48.15%, 45.23%, 47.93%; CFrel +1.74, +0.38, -0.48, +0.51, +4.18
xGF 49.03%, 46.02%, 47.48%, 43.82%, 48.78%; XGFrel -1.15, +0.89, +0.37, +0.96, +5.76
He scored 41 goals, but on 15.2% shooting, though his career average is 15.5%
He's a reliable goal scorer on the PP. Coming off his best season, you're buying high.
DeBrincat is a one trick pony, a very good goal scorer, but not an elite player.
He's a luxury item, worth adding to a good team that needs scoring, but not a player who would be a foundation piece.
The only kind of deal that would make senes to me would be something like Provorov/Atkinson where you shed salaries similar to what you'll have to pay, and have a cheap LHD to plug in for 3-4 years in York, then Zamula/Andrae.
But if I'm moving Provorov, it would be for a young 2C, not a sniper.
Hextall can be blamed for overpaying Voracek, whose contract was so bad Seattle wouldn't touch it.
Atkinson for Voracek was simply swapping contracts of equal size but different structure.
Seattle left a ton of good players on the table. Their judgement means nothing. They're incompetent.
A good GM can move a contract, especially for a player as good as Voracek, without taking another contract back or spending picks to do it. Fletcher just isn't a good GM. And that isn't Hextall's fault.
Voracek for Atkinson wasn't the only possible move. It's one that Fletcher chose. The GM of a totally unrelated team did not make him do that.
Horrid?That would be a HORRID move.
Move like this is for what , hope you can get to 7th worst next year ?
Horrid?
Horrid
Awful
Crippling
Pick the adjective. Debrincat will be paid like Chicago , but will put up 60% of those totals here all while mortgaging the future.
This rumoured move will set the team back even further and will also cause future damage.
That would be a HORRID move.
Move like this is for what , hope you can get to 7th worst next year ?
If they add DeBrincat and Gaudreau, where do we finish? I’d say they pick around 12ish
Those 2 just scream Torts players. Lol
It is possible we have no 1st or 2nd this year or next year. Like a legit possibility.
To be fair, 40 goal scorers do not grow on trees. I think we might be underrating DeBrincat a tad. And he’s only 24 with a December birthday. I still think he pots 40 here or somewhere else next yearDeBrincat is not a one dimensional player, and he’s very good, but he is just not a superstar, like Gaudreau. End of discussion. Paying him as such — twice in trade and contract — stinks of desperation. Leave it to Chicago to do to us what Columbus did to them with Jones.
Smart teams trade bottom 6 players and 2nd rounders for Buchnevich. Dumb teams? Well……
To be fair, 40 goal scorers do not grow on trees. I think we might be underrating DeBrincat a tad. And he’s only 24 with a December birthday. I still think he pots 40 here or somewhere else next year
if they get Gaudreau and DeBrincat
Crippling? To add a 24 year old 40 goal scorer for a fistful of rain? Disagree.Horrid
Awful
Crippling
Pick the adjective. Debrincat will be paid like Chicago , but will put up 60% of those totals here all while mortgaging the future.
This rumoured move will set the team back even further and will also cause future damage.
Unless they start dealing guys like TK and one of Provy/Sanheim, there is no way they can sign both. Sadly, I can absolutely see Cuck doing just that.How are they doing this? Even if you dump JVR without retention or salary coming back, then sign Gaudreau at 9, that leaves you with ~4.8 in cap space if you go cheap on the depth and roster all of Brink, N. Cates, York, Attard, and Seeler.
You also have 10 F, 7 D, and 1 G with Frost, Tippett, and Laczynski unsigned. Add MacEwen or Ratcliffe to that if you think they matter. If Fedotov reports, you can add him at 925k. I'll gladly defer to anyone else on the likelihood of that last bit.
Even a straight Atkinson dump doesn't really get you to where you would want to be. I believe it would take at least one of (Atkinson/Konecny/Provorov/Sanheim) and one of (Laughton/Lindblom) being reduced to a minimum salary.
Crippling? To add a 24 year old 40 goal scorer for a fistful of rain? Disagree.