I have some nice futures still alive. But I’ll make new picks tomorrow.
A Vegas Canes finals parlay has a very nice payout I made around the all star game.
Vegas and Canes have better team D but the worst goalie. Not like Bob and Grubby are world class but they can def get hot.
They stink. Goaltending obviously is an issue but it's more than that. McDrai and their PP cover a lot of warts, but the Oil are sloppy 5 on 5. Defensively they're still awful but even their forecheck is loose. Being fast and offensive is one thing. Pond hockey is another.Congrats to Vegas. Deserved to win.
As far as the Oil kinda not sure what they need to take the next step.
Probably won't happen but I'd like to see Pavelski hoist it.yeah i dont see who beats car but i think vegas has the biggest chance
and im pro vegas cause they gave us the easiest series in our cup run
Congrats to Vegas. Deserved to win.
As far as the Oil kinda not sure what they need to take the next step.
I want fast and offensive with discipline and defensive commitment. Oil are irresponsible. Their brand of hockey is the young guns 2.0Haven't seen many Oilers games due to time zones.
What's the difference between them and the "young, fast, offensive-minded" style people want here in DC?
Honest question. Not bait.
Their brand of hockey is the young guns 2.0
The Oilers outchanced Vegas 4 games out of 6 when adjusting for the score at even strength, and defensively they gave up the second fewest chances in the second round of any team on a per 60 basis (behind only Dallas).
The main difference was in net: the Oilers saved 3 goals below expected, and Vegas saved 3.5 goals above expected. Aiden Hill had a good game last night, and Stuart Skinner played poorly.
Despite them or because of them?Once again, goalies are the only thing that matters in the playoffs
And, its random AF too. All three Vezina finalists lost in the 1st round.
I know how you feel about the eye test, but what I see is that 5 on 5 they're just plain bad. I'd attribute the bolded--and the fact they outchanced Vegas--mainly to their best players who have a lot of possession and are so dangerous. But the chances that team as a whole does give up... woof. Guys all alone with time for tea. Glaring mistakes on nearly every Vegas goal. Loose, sloppy hockey. Contrast them with Carolina, for instance.The Oilers outchanced Vegas 4 games out of 6 when adjusting for the score at even strength, and defensively they gave up the second fewest chances in the second round of any team on a per 60 basis (behind only Dallas).
The main difference was in net: the Oilers saved 3 goals below expected, and Vegas saved 3.5 goals above expected. Aiden Hill had a good game last night, and Stuart Skinner played poorly.
All of this to say: I agree with you. This is another incarnation of the Capitals young guns in that they largely played very well but their goalies couldn't stop a beachball!
I think it's kind of a lazy narrative to imply they're an irresponsible team. I mean Nurse and Ceci are pretty bad and irresponsible individually, but I don't think it's a pervasive problem or anything. They just need a goalie, and maybe one more defenseman to play on the second pair. Otherwise they should run it back with their system largely unchanged.
Anyone but Carolina
I find it hilarious that the Oilers use a system with 11 forwards and 7 D and they STILL don't play good defence! Maybe they need a 10-8 or something hahaThey stink. Goaltending obviously is an issue but it's more than that. McDrai and their PP cover a lot of warts, but the Oil are sloppy 5 on 5. Defensively they're still awful but even their forecheck is loose. Being fast and offensive is one thing. Pond hockey is another.
The Canes would feast on that team.
Remember when they thought trading for a washed up Mike Green would fix the DI find it hilarious that the Oilers use a system with 11 forwards and 7 D and they STILL don't play good defence! Maybe they need a 10-8 or something haha