all the best players in the system are on the NHL team for a changeHow can it be that the info about our prospects is so quiet, I know many is playing in either Jersey or Utica but not all.?
Miss when this thread were updated regularly
all the best players in the system are on the NHL team for a changeHow can it be that the info about our prospects is so quiet, I know many is playing in either Jersey or Utica but not all.?
Miss when this thread were updated regularly
Lane Hutson has a very slight frame, so I agree with you that he'll never be a player with the strength of a more muscular sub-6'0 frame defender like Rafalski or Letang. He's also not exceptional in his positioning or gaps like a Andy Greene, so Hutson's future is going to be reliant on his high-octane offense while not getting completely caved in defensively.It’s hard to say because size is about body mass and player’s weight aren’t easily pinned down.
Sam Girard is listed at 5’10” and 170 and was drafted at 5’9” and 160.
Quinn Hughes is listed at 5’10” 180 and was listed at 173 at the draft. Even if he’s 5’9” the weight matters.
So I would make a distinction between a player who’s drafted 158 (Hutson) and is now listed at 155 vs one who’s drafted at 173 (Casey) and is now listed at 178. That’s a pretty significant difference in body mass.
A smaller, thinner guy can only fill out so much on a that frame.
It’s tough for shorter guys who are ~180 to make it but high end skating, hockey IQ and/or offensive production can get them in there.
Lane Hutson is electrifying but how much weight can he really put on? I obviously don’t know, and we’ll find out, but the further down from ~180 it is the harder it will be for him to realistically have any chance to make it in the NHL.
The problem with Hutson is that he isn't an elite skater at 155, there is no chance in hell he will be better than average at 175 without a absolute remake of his stride ALA Point. You can count the number of players who remade their strides on two hands.Lane Hutson has a very slight frame, so I agree with you that he'll never be a player with the strength of a more muscular sub-6'0 frame defender like Rafalski or Letang. He's also not exceptional in his positioning or gaps like a Andy Greene, so Hutson's future is going to be reliant on his high-octane offense while not getting completely caved in defensively.
Hutson to me has more upside than Girard, whom I feel has been a bit over-rated by the analytics folks. Girard getting hurt in the playoffs last year actually helped Colorado in their Stanley Cup run, in my opinion. He's just poor defensively and gets consistently caved in when caught on the ice against good forward lines. Girard is a player-type I wouldn't really want on my team, which is to say a B-level offensive defender with sub-optimal defensive ability. Players like Girard -- and Jake Gardiner and Tony DeAngelo and Shayne Gostisbehere -- to me, they are always exposed in big games and the playoffs, when you're much better off with just a solid defensive guy who can win battles down low and clear creases.
The question with Hutson is: does he have the ability to become an A-level, elite offensive defenseman like a Quinn Hughes or Erik Karlsson or John Carlson? That will be the factor which determines his NHL career. Personally, I really like Hutson's upside and am holding out hope for him.
Absolutely a concern, because Hutson's straightaway speed is not close to a Quinn Hughes. But I'd also think you'd agree with me that Hutson's edges and mobility are pretty elite, and he's as elusive as it gets. So I concur that the odds are kind of stacked against Hutson becoming more than a third-pairing, sheltered-minutes offense-generator, I'm just not giving up hope because the kid has a pretty unique skill-set and he's defied expectations at every step of the way.The problem with Hutson is that he isn't an elite skater at 155, there is no chance in hell he will be better than average at 175 without a absolute remake of his stride ALA Point. You can count the number of players who remade their strides on two hands.
Absolutely a concern, because Hutson's straightaway speed is not close to a Quinn Hughes. But I'd also think you'd agree with me that Hutson's edges and mobility are pretty elite, and he's as elusive as it gets. So I concur that the odds are kind of stacked against Hutson becoming more than a third-pairing, sheltered-minutes offense-generator, I'm just not giving up hope because the kid has a pretty unique skill-set and he's defied expectations at every step of the way.
I find it weird that a kid like Lane Hutson has become such a polarizing player (not you, of course, I'm talking the knee-jerk dopes in social media). On one hand you have the old-school, tunnel vision set saying essentially he's too small to ever have a shot in the NHL, especially without elite wheels, and the Canadiens wasted their draft pick on him. On the other hand, you have the analytic-lemmings deluding themselves that he's somehow the second coming of Erik Karlsson and rationalizing that size is completely irrelevant in professional hockey.
Not only do I find both extremes wrong, but I can't imagine using a kid as hard-working and fun to watch as Lane Hutson as a surrogate bat to blindly swing in defense of your own biases. Personally -- and I have no problem giving away all my philosophies since I'm hanging up the draft-writing soon -- I don't really tend to see players in terms of extremes at all. It's not a matter of "Player X can bust" or "Player X can become a superstar" so much as "what are the likely scenarios for Player X in the context of the current league landscape?" This is to say that -- of course Lane Hutson is never going to be a shut down defenseman at the NHL level, and he lacks the near-limitless upside of a Rasmus Dahlin or Luke Hughes due to physical limitation. But he also possesses several elite qualities which can generate offense from the blueline at any level.
The combination of Hutson's limitations and elite abilities makes him, of course, very difficult to project. The likely scenario -- as I've said and I'm guessing you'd agree -- is somewhere in the middle. If a coach shelters his minutes and he's partnered with a very good defensive guy, I think he can be effective at the highest levels. But we have to also be realistic and understand he'll never be a 20+ minute NHL defenseman because, quite simply, there's no way he's going into a corner with Brady Tkachuk and coming out with the puck. To simply take his dazzling highlights and stats in the US-NTDP and college and not apply the realities of the game into Lane Hutson's projection is simply deluding oneself to the actuality of what the sport currently is.
Anyway, I'm rooting for Lane Hutson all the way. I cheer his NCAA highlights and hold out hope he carves an offensive role in the NHL. Conversely, I also do not understand why his youth coaching did not convert him to forward earlier in his development -- I feel his skill set would have had the chance to take him a great deal further had he been on the wing. Because as much as I like Lane Hutson, if Montreal's GM offered him to me in a trade I'd politely decline and ask for someone else in the organization instead. For me, there are just too many variables involved with a player like Lane Hutson. Ultimately however, that does not mean I do not really hope Lane Hutson proves all the skeptics, myself included, wrong.
I believe they have a new coach and the team isn't going to do any favors for someone with one foot out the door.Grits point totals have really dropped off this season. Looking very pedestrian.
Any ideas as to why?
So he was demoted from the top line/s and PP unit? Less minute?I believe they have a new coach and the team isn't going to do any favors for someone with one foot out the door.
Grits point totals have really dropped off this season. Looking very pedestrian.
Any ideas as to why?
And that was something I was surprised to hear was an issue.At this point I'm just hoping Gritsyuk can play in North America next season. His shot was actually the component of his game that I had the fewest concerns about. My main concern would be whether his skating will be on par.
I think the NHL gets slightly faster every couple of years. Guys that were just average five or six years ago are a half stride behind now. To me that is why guys like Butcher started out getting by and just fell off. Same for a guy like Ty Smith.And that was something I was surprised to hear was an issue.
The NHL is very much a skating league, so as we've seen with Holtz, it's not easy lot to overcome that if you hope to excel in this league.
If Nemec joins Sweden and Luke USA, it's going to be a great WJC for us to watch.Team Canada announced its December camp roster. Brennan got an invite, Stillman did not: World Juniors IIHF Connor Bedard Adam Fantilli | TSN
Team USA's camp roster includes Hughes, Casey: 2023 WJC | Preliminary Roster
Don’t forget Hauser for the Czechs. Is Topias Vilen still eligible?If Nemec joins Sweden and Luke USA, it's going to be a great WJC for us to watch.
Don’t forget Hauser for the Czechs. Is Topias Vilen still eligible?
If Nemec joins Sweden and Luke USA, it's going to be a great WJC for us to watch.
Don’t forget Hauser for the Czechs. Is Topias Vilen still eligible?
Recently Elite Prospects did a stock watch for the AHL, NCAA, USHL, Russia, Sweden, Finland, WHL, OHL and QMJHL.
There were 18 NHL prospects with Stock Rising, 11 NHL prospects with Stock Steady, and 11 NHL prospects with Stock Falling.
We had a strong representation in the 18 Rising with 3 of them, plus they gently neg Luke’s defense while putting him in the Steady group.
View attachment 618153
View attachment 618152
View attachment 618154
View attachment 618155
View attachment 618156
View attachment 618157
View attachment 618158