Nothing about the organization this season is "all on Verbeek", the organization is still primarily the remnants of what he inherited. Next season with a PV coaching staff and another influx of players acquired by him and it will start to shift towards being mostly reflective of him
It is because Verbeek reset the rebuild. There were two ways to go at the TDL: keep the UFAs and continue to add talent from outside the org or reset the rebuild.
Verbeek reset the rebuild b/c he wants talent depth for long playoff runs and to control the cap. Fine, I bought into it at the TDL, but that also means we're going to be crap for awhile. We're doing what Murray did for his rebuild, find plugs and swap around players who needed a new environment. That's how we finished 8th in 2019, 5th in 2020, and 2nd in 2021.
Defense: Vaaks, White, Klingberg, Kulikov, and Beaulieu represents over half of the blue line talents Verbeek has added after losing Lindholm and Manson.
Top-6 Forwards: Added Vatrano and Strome. Both are weak defensively. Strome now has a moniker of "Stroke".
Waiver pickups: Leason and Megna.
Waiver miss: Tolvanen.
PP coach left: Ward
PP coach replacement: none
The remnants of this team is what helped us from being a complete embarrassment this year. Verbeek's replacement players have mostly been a huge dud. Eakins was set up to fail. I was surprised when Eakins was extended last off-season b/c new GM's tend to bring in their own coach.
I'm okay with Eakins getting fired, but I'm not okay with people not accepting the personnel acquisitions were the factors for a failed season. Did I predict we'd be bad if we didn't replace the defensive talents we lost before the season? Yes. Yes, I did.
When LaCombe looks like a top-4D in only his second game in the NHL, then that speaks volumes of the failure of talent acquisition for the blueline.