Even just one of them is an issue. That's why we so desperately need JTC's money.I was just mapping out a roster for next season and they’ll most likely need to run someone like LOC on the 3rd line to bring back Newhook and Meyers.
You definitely can’t pay all the 3rd liners $3M, but one of them shouldn’t be an issue. Then they probably bring in a depth guy at the deadline with whatever cap they’ve accumulated throughout the year.
You're definitely in the wrong thread if you don't like roster projection.I don’t think most of us are into being told by hf posters what the roster is going to be, like it’s concrete evidence.
Can't place a value on shutting Size Queens up.Yeah, I do think the Manson contract is steep.
I would’ve felt more comfortable with him at $3.5M.
Honestly though, a lot of number 4 D get overpaid. It happens every year. I’m confident Manson would’ve gotten that deal on the open market.
I think the Avs felt it was worth paying for Manson’s physicality. He’s really not a world beater defensively, it’s the physicality that he brings that’s valuable. And his skating is still pretty good right now.
Still think they signed Manson to term knowing they’d move one of their other defenceman this off-season, or next.
I know you don’t mean it like that but players outperforming their contract and expectations is a good problem to have, especially while the Avs control their rights.The thing is... What happens if Meyers then also plays really well this year and solidifies himself as a legit 3C?
He's an RFA without Arb rights I believe so you can probably squeeze him down to like ~2M on a 2 year deal but still... Newhook gets $3.5M, Meyers gets $2M... On top of the tight cap already.
Something simply will have to give. Even more then just "Eh let's just ship Girard out"
It's a good problem to have sure... Still a problem though.I know you don’t mean it like that but players outperforming their contract and expectations is a good problem to have, especially while the Avs control their rights.
... especially when the forward market is as cheap as it is, with players like Heinen, Balcers, Janmark, etc signing one year deals for $750k-$1.25m.That doesn't make any sense. You don't trade Girard or Toews to make room for expensive 3rd liners.
I think this is a key piece that's being ignored in this discussion.Avs just need to somehow work thru these next 2 years, then the cap will go up much higher than by just 1 mill; since the escrow will be repaid from the COVID seasons.
After not playing again next season, the Avs will trade for Carey Price (finally). He does end up being the savior of the franchise as was predicted by Habs fans, but it's because he gives the Avs an additional 10 million to play around with.Seeing all the teams that are cheating cap, I don’t see anyway for us not to play the same game. It’ll be interesting to see if there is a way we can cheat or take advantage of some loopholes because we are putting ourselves at a serious disadvantage by not.
nothing too surprising. Bad teams at the top. Good teams at the bottom.![]()
Which NHL teams improved the most this summer? Ranking the work of all 32 GMs
Here’s how much each team has changed this offseason, from most value added to most value subtracted.theathletic.com
End of the season rosters. I'd say bad at top and good at bottom is a broad brush. Caps are not an elite team, but a good team that makes the playoffs... they are #3. Kings a team on the rise and made the playoffs #10. Nashville and Dallas were both playoff teams and in the top 10. Blackhawks terrible team and got worse #28. San Jose similar but #22.nothing too surprising. Bad teams at the top. Good teams at the bottom.
Slightly premature since most rosters arent finalized.
Also, when is comparison based on? Ending roster for last season? Beginning roster of last season?
I really dont care much for his Colorado snippet.End of the season rosters. I'd say bad at top and good at bottom is a broad brush. Caps are not an elite team, but a good team that makes the playoffs... they are #3. Kings a team on the rise and made the playoffs #10. Nashville and Dallas were both playoff teams and in the top 10. Blackhawks terrible team and got worse #28. San Jose similar but #22.
The Avs were #25... but... "Colorado’s spot on this list hinges on what we will call Schrodinger’s Kadri. Right now, he’s not in or out of the lineup, but at nearly three wins of expected value he’s the difference between Colorado being 25th on this list and Colorado being dead last with a bullet. He would represent a big hit to the team’s chances of repeating as champions."
![]()
Which NHL teams improved the most this summer? Ranking the work of all 32 GMs
Here’s how much each team has changed this offseason, from most value added to most value subtracted.theathletic.com
Yeah that’s kinda my point.Sucks for the good teams at the bottom that didn't win.
Luckily, that's not the Avs. Losing talent hurts less when you're the best team in the league and defending champs.
The ranking of the teams isn't out... they gotta pump more articles.Yeah that’s kinda my point.
Is there a final ranking in the end that I didn’t see? Where are these teams ranked from 1-32 following these changes?
The Avs were 1st, could be last on this list, and still be 1st or close to it.
Going from Kadri to nothing and Kuemper to Georgiev is a pretty substantial impact. 2C is arguably the 2nd most important forward position and a top 5 on the team. Going from Kadri who was elite at that spot last year to Compher/Newhook/Meyers is a pretty dramatic downgrade. Kuemper to George is clearly a proven starter to a questionable one who has never been a starter. I'm not Kuemper fan, but on paper that is also a significant downgrade. There is a lot of logic to the impact there.I really dont care much for his Colorado snippet.
Its completely understandable. The Avs added 4 players at the deadline last year. There was no way but down for them from there.
Secondly, the vast majority of his win/loss is based on goaltending and Kadri. An extremely difficult comparison to make is the goaltending. We have no idea how Georgiev will react to playing on the Avs as a starter.
Also, as for Kadri, the Avs roster is incomplete for now and isnt the playoff roster team. The avs could still address the position in season.
Going into the season, it doesnt really matter how many expected wins or losses should be expected. As is, this team is likely a top 3 western team, without any additions.
Edit: Just as an extra, Dom's models basically projected last year's team as the best team ever assembled lol. Is it surprising that we're close to the worst in terms of improvement when we're starting from an impossible beginning spot?
There is absolutely no disagreement from the logic. It absolutely makes sense. Again, Doms model had last years version of the Avs as quite possibly the greatest team ever assembled.The ranking of the teams isn't out... they gotta pump more articles.
Going from Kadri to nothing and Kuemper to Georgiev is a pretty substantial impact. 2C is arguably the 2nd most important forward position and a top 5 on the team. Going from Kadri who was elite at that spot last year to Compher/Newhook/Meyers is a pretty dramatic downgrade. Kuemper to George is clearly a proven starter to a questionable one who has never been a starter. I'm not Kuemper fan, but on paper that is also a significant downgrade. There is a lot of logic to the impact there.