You had a cow early on when it was suggested that Girard be traded before Byram. Then Girard went out with injury against the Blues and Byram replaced his role and helped the Avs to win the WCF and SCF. Once it became apparent how good Byram was playing in the POs after Girard went down you changed your tune pretty quickly on him.I.... Ok?
I have no idea what the point you're trying to make is? Are you suggesting Byram is better then Makar?
When you say rookie year are you referring to the year he played in the playoffs or the following season?Then prove it
Otherwise there's literally only one of us spewing complete garbage, and it isn't me.
To me if he tops out as a #2 than your saying a 21 year old is completed developing and will stagnate the rest of his career.I dont think his Offensive ability will fully translate to the NHL level. I think he end up a ~35-40 point guy with good 2-way ability but not quite dominant enough on the offensive side to be a true #1 guy.
I basically see him as a slightly weaker Toews in his prime years. Although I also don't think his defensive game will actually be quite as good as Toews either.
Quality #2 guy and a great partner for Cale, but just not a #1 guy.
Byram has already posted 0.39 PPG in the regular season + 0.45 PPG in the playoffs. He hasn't been on the PP yet and is clearly still finding his way offensively, not surprising as Bo has less than 70 games played in the league.I dont think his Offensive ability will fully translate to the NHL level. I think he end up a ~35-40 point guy with good 2-way ability but not quite dominant enough on the offensive side to be a true #1 guy.
I basically see him as a slightly weaker Toews in his prime years. Although I also don't think his defensive game will actually be quite as good as Toews either.
Quality #2 guy and a great partner for Cale, but just not a #1 guy.
B is for BergeronSounds like Naz is a goner. What’s your plan B Mac/Sac?
Lmao no he isn’t.Lou gonna trade Barzal to Colorado to make room for Naz
Always been a big Lundell fan but he's no Alexander Urbom.Anton Lundell is easily the most overrated player on this board IMO. It's not even close.
Until a few weeks after we repeat (or not) and then a guy like Newhook is looking like a steady 50+ pt player at age 22 for the foreseeable future.If you have the chance to get a player like Patrick Kane you do it every single time.
Imagine Kane on this team...... Western teams would find themself in another nightmare.
I dont even think it has anything to do with Newhook.Always been a big Lundell fan but he's no Alexander Urbom.
Until a few weeks after we repeat (or not) and then a guy like Newhook is looking like a steady 50+ pt player at age 22 for the foreseeable future.
There are several scenarios in which the AVS would be a nightmare to play against - not just with the addition on PKane. For sure, he'd make us more formidable offensively but I still believe that whether it's him or Miller or any other rental that would only be here for that one run - would not cost a guy like Newhook. It would be more value but in the 'hypothetical' and unproven category.
I'll ask again - when was the last time a contender gave up a young player like Newhook for a straight-up rental??
Fair enough but at the same time, we don't have a lot of holes in the lineup either.I dont even think it has anything to do with Newhook.
I think its entirely based on the fact that other than our 1sts, we dont have very many desirable assets.
Any trade offer, will be compared to other offers. Right off the bat, our 1st is worth less than everyone else's. So already we start on the back foot. So you have to make up the value with other assets.
We basically have Newhook, Behrens, OO and our 1sts as what I would view as desirable assets. I cant really say much for the other propects in our system.
If and when Kadri is gone, this is the team we are going to the season with. Maybe re-sign JMFJ, that's it (obviously announce the MacK extension at some point). Will this center depth (or rather lack of such a thing) be enough in the playoffs? I don't think so, and I doubt Sakic and MacFarland think that way either. But that's not an issue that needs to be addressed before the season if it's going to cost a Newhook or a Girard to do it.
Im in 100% agreement with you about how to handle Newhook and under what circumstances he should be traded. I would not trade him for a 1 year rental either.Fair enough but at the same time, we don't have a lot of holes in the lineup either.
I fully understand that a guy like Newhook for him to fit this current Avs team's contending window would have to step up as the teams #2C starting next year but at the same time, he wouldn't be a guy I would move for a player that's only going to help us for 1 playoff run. A player with 2 years left? Maybe.
Ideally, it would come down to a situation like this : Vancouver finally re-ups JT Miller but now can't afford Horvat so they trade him to the Avs for a cheaper more cost-controlled Newhook + pick(s) and/or whatever with the Avs re-signing Horvat long-term.
That's the kind of trade you move him for, in my opinion.
Patrick Kane has a full NMC and thus controls his destination 100%. That being the case it might not take Newhook to get it done.I dont even think it has anything to do with Newhook.
I think its entirely based on the fact that other than our 1sts, we dont have very many desirable assets.
Any trade offer, will be compared to other offers. Right off the bat, our 1st is worth less than everyone else's. So already we start on the back foot. So you have to make up the value with other assets.
We basically have Newhook, Behrens, OO and our 1sts as what I would view as desirable assets. I cant really say much for the other propects in our system.