The Abusement Park
Registered User
- Jan 18, 2016
- 35,344
- 26,637
And Lundell looks like ROR 2.0? I think Stutzle has the higher ceiling but people are treating Lundell like he’s Horvat.Yes? I think Stutzle has franchise 1C written all over him.
And Lundell looks like ROR 2.0? I think Stutzle has the higher ceiling but people are treating Lundell like he’s Horvat.Yes? I think Stutzle has franchise 1C written all over him.
And Lundell looks like ROR 2.0? I think Stutzle has the higher ceiling but people are treating Lundell like he’s Horvat.
I’m not arguing that. I agree with the premise that Stutzle has more upside. But Lundells upside is insanely as well.I think Stutzle is just in another tier in terms of potential. He’s got top 5 forward in the league type upside.
I think Stuzle is closer to someone like Jack Hughes than he is Lundell personally.
I’m not arguing that. I agree with the premise that Stutzle has more upside. But Lundells upside is insanely as well.
Would assume Klingberg signing there rules out EJ to the Ducks.
I agree I think he will be a center, but it isn't a sure thing yet. Hardly any though? 5v5 he spent ~10% of his time with Norris. That's not insignificant (BTW they were terrible together).He'll be a centre. His linemates point to him being a centre for sure, he spent hardly any time with a guy like Norris at 5v5. I think he's got superstar written all over him.
Yes hardly any time. He played 83 minutes with Norris at 5v5. That's nothing.I agree I think he will be a center, but it isn't a sure thing yet. Hardly any though? 5v5 he spent ~10% of his time with Norris. That's not insignificant (BTW they were terrible together).
Lundell's ceiling is Bergeron 2.0. He's absurdly good on both ends of the ice... might even have more offensive pop to his game.
That's 10% of his 5v5 time...Yes hardly any time. He played 83 minutes with Norris at 5v5. That's nothing.
I agree I think he will be a center, but it isn't a sure thing yet. Hardly any though? 5v5 he spent ~10% of his time with Norris. That's not insignificant (BTW they were terrible together).
Lundell's ceiling is Bergeron 2.0. He's absurdly good on both ends of the ice... might even have more offensive pop to his game.
Player | GP | G | A | P | +/- | PPP | FO% | Cost to acquire |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Lundell | 65 | 18 | 26 | 44 | 33 | 4 | 44.7 | D Bowen Byram |
P. Stastny | 71 | 21 | 24 | 45 | 14 | 8 | 56.5 | 1 year contract |
Yeah he played great to finish the season in a larger role. I'm a believer in him. I'm simply stating it hasn't been proven. With the Petey, Hughes, Lundell group... they've proven their ability at center.I think it’s pretty close to a sure thing at this point. He flourished at C this year and Ottawa went out and added two very good wingers. Giroux would be a perfect fit next to him.
He’s awful at faceoffs but Sens fans were raving about his play once he got moved to C. I don’t know the exact numbers but they were really promising. Think he had a stretch of 30 points in like 25 games at C.
Yeah he played great to finish the season in a larger role. I'm a believer in him. I'm simply stating it hasn't been proven. With the Petey, Hughes, Lundell group... they've proven their ability at center.
Lol I don't know what we're arguing here man. It's a very insignificant amount of time. He spent more time with 8 other forwards on the Senators at 5v5. The time with Norris was nothing.That's 10% of his 5v5 time...
I would just call him untouchable period. The level that he was playing at in the playoffs at a fresh 21 years old with all the disruptuions in his development was amazing. I'm excited to see him continue to develop.Byram should be untouchable unless someone wants to clearly overpay. Could very well turn into one of the best Dmen in the league.
I'm the one who suggested the Lundell/Byram idea, but it was simply for the sake of discussion to gauge opinion. Feel free to fill the airwaves with other topics of conversation if you have any better ideasThis board is effed up. It went from trade G/Johnson, to Toews, and now to Byram. Clearly most have forgotten how shitty the Avs D were for the longest time. We need a 2C not a 1C. You win by starting with the back end
Yeah I'd trade Byram for Lundell if Florida would. Not a chance they do that though. Lundell is a superstar in the making and the perfect 2C behind Barkov long term.
They'll move Bennett in 2 years time when Lundell is an RFA to make room for him in the Top 6.
Why is discussing trade ideas so controversial? I'd move Makar and MacKinnon if it improved the teams chances of winning a cup (*board rages that someone wants to trade Makar*...)If this Kadri thing takes a few more days we'll be offering up Makar
I think they’d definitely consider it with how weak they are on defence.
It’s not like Lundell has a higher ceiling than Byram.