2022-2023 Around the League Part Deux

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah pretty sure my opinion would not be the majority one. But I also wanted to say this, even though we disagree on these things, I have absolutely no problems with any of you that feel differently. Don't think of you differently, won't think of you differently and will continue to enjoy every single demented post.

Hope my opinion doesn't remove me from the same consideration on y'alls behalf.
Yah. I wont judge anyone any differently after tonight. I will hate you all equally for killing my tank hard for Bedard dream.
 
Yeah pretty sure my opinion would not be the majority one. But I also wanted to say this, even though we disagree on these things, I have absolutely no problems with any of you that feel differently. Don't think of you differently, won't think of you differently and will continue to enjoy every single demented post.

Hope my opinion doesn't remove me from the same consideration on y'alls behalf.
You're good, bud. We're here to talk hockey. Shit like this sucks, but it happens. The discussion here was much more respectful than it ever could have been on the mains.
 
You can respect someone and their choices/lifestyle while simultaneously not being in full support of it. It's basically "Go ahead and do your thing" vs. "I'm going to support you throughout your journey".

If players are allowed to refuse a trip to the White House for varying political reasons, then I don't see why a person can't choose to sit out of an LGBT event due to religious reasons.
 
They want to force them to wear their political statement. But if they were to wear a political statement against (anti-abortion) they would scream and kick like toddlers.
 
Again, occupations and religion are choices. They are not equivalent.

And if you're looking for hyprocrisy, just look at how Torts treated this versus kneeling for the anthem.
Sorry, I said that I would abandon but that is actually an interesting thing to me too. We can sit here and hypothesize on the what-ifs with Provorov in regards to his views but what Torts did is more damning in my view. How he can threaten to sit a player for one belief but let another go for theirs is pretty damning to me and speaks more to actual bigotry and hypocrisy than what Provorov done.
 
You're good, bud. We're here to talk hockey. Shit like this sucks, but it happens. The discussion here was much more respectful than it ever could have been on the mains.

I appreciate it man. And the wonderful thing about my opinion is that is has been known to be wrong before and I have absolutely no problem modifying my opinions and beliefs as I grow and learn. Trust me, that process is continuing into my 50s now. But I like to challenge myself to learn in order to become a better husband, person, coworker and all-around human all the time.




Gord puts it right. Freedom of expression doesn't grant you freedom from consequences of your actions. He shouldn't have played tonight.

But whose freedom of expression are we talking about. The Leagues, the Flyers or Provs? He was being forced to wear someone else's freedom of expression, not his own.

And with that, I'm done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Moops
They want to force them to wear their political statement. But if they were to wear a political statement against (anti-abortion) they would scream and kick like toddlers.
Buddy, they wear camo jerseys on military night all the time. Pride is about the right to exist.

LGBT issues are political issues. They aren't mutually exclusive.
They are MADE political by people who do not like them. The right to exist and enjoy the sport you love is not political.
 
Again, occupations and religion are choices. They are not equivalent.

And if you're looking for hyprocrisy, just look at how Torts treated this versus kneeling for the anthem.
Sorry, I ran out of free time now so I can't continue with this discussion. If you want to continue you can PM me at any time.

I want to finish with this. I don't think we can get over the hump of choice vs freedom, thus our views won't ever get into alignment. However, I do understand why you consider it serious and what it really comes down to. I already explained the biological basis against the born-gay argument and that's where I keep my viewpoint. I will always take the principles of science over sociology. Again, that is not to disrespect or undermine homosexuality at all, I personally find freedom of choice more significant in life than being "born of something." A lot of "being born of something" tends to be negative such as increased levels of schizophrenia if your parent has it, ADHD if your parent has it, or heart disease, if your past generations have it like Elvis Presley's family might do.
 
We tend to focus on individual people who do not have that much power and influence. We can argue all we want about what Provorov should have or shouldn't have done or what we would have all done.

It seems like there are players on the Flyers who have spent actual hours supporting the community and creating powerful and influential opportunities for actual children. That is what is important.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pierce Hawthorne
Buddy, they wear camo jerseys on military night all the time. Pride is about the right to exist.


They are MADE political by people who do not like them. The right to exist and enjoy the sport you love is not political.

Regardless, my initial point still stands. People have a right to their own viewpoint in life and you can respect the other side while not agreeing with them. Again, it's "Go ahead and do your thing" vs. "I will support you throughout your journey". He's not telling other people how to live their lives, he's living his own through his morals and beliefs. Which is how religion should be.

This expected policy of follow along or be punished is nuts.
 
Regardless, my initial point still stands. People have a right to their own viewpoint in life and you can respect the other side while not agreeing with them. Again, it's "Go ahead and do your thing" vs. "I will support you throughout your journey". He's not telling other people how to live their lives, he's living his own through his morals and beliefs. Which is how religion should be.

This expected policy of follow along or be punished is nuts.
Blows my mind but it is the world we live in today. Comply or be ostracized and villainized.

The crazies on Twitter out in full force demanding the Flyers terminate his contract.
 
Regardless, my initial point still stands. People have a right to their own viewpoint in life and you can respect the other side while not agreeing with them. Again, it's "Go ahead and do your thing" vs. "I will support you throughout your journey". He's not telling other people how to live their lives, he's living his own through his morals and beliefs. Which is how religion should be.

This expected policy of follow along or be punished is nuts.
Well there is no team policy and there was no punishment.

Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pokecheque
Meh. Some people in life really value religion. I put my religion above everything in life as a Muslim, and I would do the exact same thing Provorov did.

Just because someone doesn't think the way you feel they should think doesn't make them a bad person.

Good point!
 
Okay, I lied, one last post and I am totally done. Yes, but those are all lifestyle choices though, just like Provorov believing that homosexuality is a sin. Don't you choose who you want to marry? Don't you choose to be single or even worse go mgtow lol? The attribute of choice is the best foundational principle that life gave us, especially in the western world. Being gay can be a choice due to environmental factors raised throughout life, a lot of gays tend to find occupations in creative fields based on the environment (musician parents develop musician offspring even if that is a choice of likes/dislikes). Like those Bible preachers who convert gays into straight individuals, regardless of what you think of them, they have converted homosexuals back into straight cis-people. If being gay wasn't a choice, then this wouldn't ever happen because stronger forces like genetics or being born would reign supreme over the logic of choice. For example, those Bible converters won't ever be able to change a person's eye colour, but belief systems can be changed and do change all the time. There are many famous people who were lesbians/gays and went back to being straight. Ellen DeGeneres's ex-wife was a lesbian with her and went back to marrying a man, actually, bisexuality defeats the argument that you are born gay.
I think we're oversimplifying here. Sexuality is a spectrum. We as humans try to fit everything into neat little boxes so we can label them and then judge them. People can be attracted to both sexes, or any number of genders (because gender is a social construct). Where you fall on the wide wide spectrum of human sexuality isn't because of the kind of toys you played with as a kid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pokecheque
Well there is no team policy and there was no punishment.

Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.

Yet we have media outlets and other people declaring that he should have been or should be punished.

Like I said, the expected policy of there being punishment for this is nuts. Punishing (or wanting punishment for) those who just want to live by their own beliefs/lifestyle is funnily enough exactly what's wrong with religion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alienblood
Yet we have media outlets and other people declaring that he should have been or should be punished.

Like I said, the expected policy of there being punishment for this is nuts. Punishing (or wanting punishment for) those who just want to live by their own beliefs/lifestyle is funnily enough exactly what's wrong with religion.
We live in a society and that has consequences. He may sincerely feel he did nothing wrong, but many people feel otherwise as you can clearly see.
 
Well there is no team policy and there was no punishment.

Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.
Again, whose freedom of speech are we talking about here. Prov was being ordered to wear somebody else's freedom of speech, not his own.

I had absolutely no problems with Colin K for the same reasoning.
 
We live in a society and that has consequences. He may sincerely feel he did nothing wrong, but many people feel otherwise as you can clearly see.

There are those who believe that the LGBT community are wrong. Should the LGBT community be punished because many people feel that way? F*** no.

We should be moving towards a society where people can live by their own moral code so long as it doesn't hurt or impact others. Not whatever this bullshit is where you're either with us or against us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad