Avsboy
Registered User
- Dec 12, 2006
- 32,138
- 16,658
It was the Manson one. Not sure why it was deleted originallyWhat did this say?
He's been on the market for like a year. And he solves a problem position for a bit, it's worth paying up for.My objection to Gibson I'm not sure he'll be on the market and I think the trade cost will be considerably more than Varlamov.
Carolina better be adding something to this.Girard for Necas?
Not according to him this off-season.He's been on the market for like a year. And he solves a problem position for a bit, it's worth paying up for.
I mean he said he didn't ask for a trade. That doesn't mean he's off the market.Not according to him this off-season.
It doesn't make a ton off sense Verbeek would want to get rid of him.I mean he said he didn't ask for a trade. That doesn't mean he's off the market.
Because you see him as nothing more than a 3C?I love Necas and I feel like that is rape.
Necas isn't a center in the NHL IMO... if he was a long-term 2C, I'd think real hard about it.Because you see him as nothing more than a 3C?
I wonder if Sakic would have any interest in Ethan Bear.
Bear's generally had good underlying numbers in his career but didn't play much in Carolina this year. He played a lot in Edmonton before getting the boot after a tough post-season.
I'm not trying to connect any trade dots (i.e. Bear/Girard/Necas). Bear should be affordable (both trade value and contract value), and Colorado loves to scoop up struggling young RFA's.
Oh boy… here we goThere’s questions about his maturity and his work habits… nope don’t want him
I'm really emotional when I play so you lot would have some Tuukka Rask level moments to talk about me.I want to see option 26. Post game threads would be amazing
One of the most mature guys for his age in the league, actually.There’s questions about his maturity and his work habits… nope don’t want him
Would rather just put him in a package for GibsonCarolina better be adding something to this.
Well what are the ones in between?! We need those ones!For goalies... options in order:
1. Gibson with 50% retention
2. Gibson with 45% retention
3. Gibson with 40% retention
.
.
18. MAF for a year
19. MAF for 2 years
20. Campbell
21. Samsonov/Vaneck
22. Husso
23. Shooter Tutor
24. F it, go empty net
25. Kuemper for league minimum
26. @S E P H
27. Kuemper for market rate
28. Comrie
I wouldn't be opposed to it as a backup option if their #1 target falls through. Flower was bad this year, but you can't underestimate what motivation can do for a guy that craves a last chance at a Cup on a true Cup contender.Fleury on a super cheap contract would be pretty great honestly(I think he's going to be cheap as I think he wants to play for a Contender). That might be my preferred direction.
For example Fleury at $2M for 1 year, that would mean an extra ~3.5M in cap space this summer to spend on the 2nd line, compared to what we were all expecting before the playoffs started(Where re-signing Kuemper at ~5.5M seemed the obvious direction).
And our goaltending would certainly be no worse then what we are getting right now in these playoffs with Kuemper.