- Apr 25, 2006
- 53,858
- 60,251
He’s been on the block since JR came in.Garland probably on the block.
Neither guy has the numbers to justify those amounts though. Leks is an RFA, so hopefully it works out long-term because I'd hate to lose that guy in only a year or two after what we gave up for him.I think Nichushkin will be closer to $6.5M than $5.5M.
And Lehkonen will be closer to $5M than $4M.
God’s truth, I’m happy with anything long term up to $4.75MLehkonen is an RFA making $2.3M and didn't have very big numbers before coming to Colorado. Joe will probably look to give him a contract like Compher's $3.5M or Donskoi's $3.9M (signed as a UFA though).
He had good playoffs last year and was having a good season before the trade. If the Avs plan to play him in the top 6 then somewhere around 4.5M is fine as long as the term is there (3+ years).Lehkonen is an RFA making $2.3M and didn't have very big numbers before coming to Colorado. Joe will probably look to give him a contract like Compher's $3.5M or Donskoi's $3.9M (signed as a UFA though).
He had good playoffs last year and was having a good season before the trade. If the Avs plan to play him in the top 6 then somewhere around 4.5M is fine as long as the term is there (3+ years).
I'm sure we can have him for like 3.5M on a one year deal then lose him next summer for nothing.
Last time in a similar situation he signed Nuke and Bura to only 2 year deals. That's what I'm scared of.But Joe tends to get good value on RFA's like him. I would guess $4M is his max on a multi year deal.
Last time in a similar situation he signed Nuke and Bura to only 2 year deals. That's what I'm scared of.
Neither guy has the numbers to justify those amounts though. Leks is an RFA, so hopefully it works out long-term because I'd hate to lose that guy in only a year or two after what we gave up for him.
As for Nuke, if he was able to go out and get a $6.5M multi-year contract as a UFA, that would pretty much be unprecedented. Most players aged 26-28 on their 3rd/4th contract that end up signing a contract that starts with a 6 have several seasons as top-6 forwards under their belt. Last year, Jaden Schwartz signed for $5.5M after putting up FIVE 50+ point seasons in the prior 7 years.
Now I get it, Nuke is a different animal but I see his situation a bit like Danault's last year. He only managed to snag a six year deal at $5.5M after coming off a 24 point season (+4 points in the playoffs) but such a great run as a strong 2-way force during the playoffs. Still he had two 40 point seasons and a 53 point season in the past five years before signing in LA and he plays a much more important position. You could argue that Danault was more proven as a top-6 F when he became a UFA than Nuke is this year.
For those reasons, I believe Nuke will re-sign with the Avs and Avs fans will be happy with the deal.
Bura being two and done was the right call. Who knew Nuke was going to do this *points at everything on the ice*? I mean, besides @Sea_Eagles. Hell, Nuke didn't even know himself until he went out and did it.Last time in a similar situation he signed Nuke and Bura to only 2 year deals. That's what I'm scared of.
Cal Makar for 6 years actually.Last time in a similar situation he signed Nuke and Bura to only 2 year deals. That's what I'm scared of.
Sooooo... ya'll got any of them goalies?
Samsonov can f*** off in Washington. He's Russian Darcy Kuemper. One bad goal every game.Samsonov or Jack Campbell, come on down.
That would certainly make for front page hockey newsWhat should he say? Something along the line of “he sucks and I would rather eat mac&cheese than seeing him again defending our net”?
I'm not sure if you're serious or not, but given what the market looks like for goalies this summer this could happen. There's familiarity with the forwards and EJ. It should cost much to get him either. Joe might get him for cheap at 3.5M or for a dance at full price.It'll be Varlamov.
Deadly.I'm not sure if you're serious or not,