Freudian
Clearly deranged
- Jul 3, 2003
- 50,356
- 17,738
If EJ decides to retire after this year, keeping Manson around might be more important than if EJ continues another year.
Burakovsky can and likely will command 5x5 as a UFA.Thanks. Any word on what he's looking for in a new deal?
If EJ decides to retire after this year, keeping Manson around might be more important than if EJ continues another year.
Friedman talked more about Nichushkin on the pod today. He said someone from another team called him to ask if he's going to have a segment during the intermission and if he is then he should talk about Nichushkin. That person said the Avs have gone to Nichushkin and told him other than MacKinnon's deal, he's the top priority.
Avs don't think they can keep Kadri but they believe they have a good shot at Nichushkin. He knows what it's like playing elsewhere and how fit is so important so even if the Avs can't make the best offer, he could take less as long as it's a competitive offer because he likes it here and they're the team that believed in him when no one else did.
All speculation and you always have to wonder why someone from another team wants that type of info out there but still great news if true.
If EJ is staying then he’d be best used on a PT basis. I don’t think he’s durable enough to play a full season and he’s at his best if platooned.Pretty much.
I think EJ has shown he can still get it done as a #4 guy, when he's paired with an elite transitional guy like Girard.
If he plays out his contract, which I think he will, we don't need Manson at all. Just get a cheap #6D and this group will be elite once again.
If EJ decides to LTIRetire, then you could look at Manson but certainly nor for 4M+ or 4 years.
Yup, take it with a grain of salt but still good to hear.
If Nuke can get 6M on the open market, I think he signs for 5.5M with us.
EJ played as close to a full season as possible this year.If EJ is staying then he’d be best used on a PT basis. I don’t think he’s durable enough to play a full season and he’s at his best if platooned.
His UFA market value is probably around 20M total. So 5M X 4 or 4M X 5 or 3.35M X 6.
If he walks good luck replacing what he brings to the right side.
EJ isn't leaving $6m on the table by retiring.If EJ decides to retire after this year, keeping Manson around might be more important than if EJ continues another year.
I think he’ll put up better numbers on a worse team.Ducks fan in peace. Hope Manson is doing well. Would still love him back in Amaheim. I was wondering what you all felt about Burakovsky? Play style, next contract will he be re-signed?
Already have with Lehkonen.His UFA market value is probably around 20M total. So 5M X 4 or 4M X 5 or 3.35M X 6.
If he walks good luck replacing what he brings to the right side.
???Already have with Lehkonen.
I don't think we keep Kuemper but yes, this discussion started with the idea that if we trade Girard we have to keep Manson. We can't keep both.That's probably fair, though I was speaking in terms of what the Avs can probably afford. If they intend to add a 2C (eg. Copp or Trocheck for ~$5-6m) while also keeping Girard and re-signing Nuke ($6m), Lehkonen ($4m), and Kuemper ($5.5m) then re-signing Manson isn't realistic at all unless they go cheaper than expected on some guys or just trade someone. Signing Manson to $4m+ would also cause further issues beyond 2023. I just don't see it as feasible unless Sakic: goes cheap in goal; doesn't add a 2C; and/or or trades Girard.
I know he is. I don't understand your point.Lehkonen is an RFA
I know he is. I don't understand your point.
I know he is. I don't understand your point.Lehkonen is an RFA
"Bottom 4 dmen" has been used many time in the past. I have used it myself. Just like Top-4 dman means you consider the dman to be a #4 at worst, bottom-4 dman means he tops out as a #3 and is not good enough to play on the top pair.You are the only person I have ever seen use the term “bottom 4 Dmen.” You’re aware there are only 6 of them, right? I think too many of you are getting caught up with stat watching. Manson has a good history of durability which Girard and EJ do not. Moving on from Girard can net some good pieces to restock the roster for players that are going to walk. After this postseason, holding onto EJ should be a plan too. Play him less during the regular season to keep him fresh for the playoffs, like they did this year.
Toews-Makar
Byram-Manson
xxx-EJ
Duh!!! For some reason I thought he had one more year on his current contract. Nevermind he is a priority as well then.If he doesn’t extend this summer he can’t play next year…so he can’t wait to extend. Unless you meant he should take a shorter term deal, but that’s not your wording.
Bobrovsky retained heavily shopped around the league
“Florida may be floating out that they’d be willing to [take on] 50 percent (of his salary) and hope that it doesn’t, that they can hold back less money,” Kypreos said on Real Kyper & Bourne. “They’ve got cap issues as much as anyone out there in the league.”
![]()
Reports: Sergei Bobrovsky ‘being shopped hard’ by the Florida Panthers, John Gibson could be on trade block
If the Florida Panthers had it their way, Sergei Bobrovsky WOULD BE OFF THE CASE. (Sorry, I couldn't help myself.) Sportsnet 590…russianmachineneverbreaks.com
"One team that could be interested in landing Bobrovsky is the Washington Capitals. During the Capitals’ locker cleanout day, general manager Brian MacLellan said that he would prefer to not turn to the young goaltending duo of Ilya Samsonov and Vitek Vanecek for a third-straight season.
“I think our goalie decision will be our first one,” MacLellan said of the team’s offseason plan. “And then we’re going to go from there depending on how much money we have.
“We’re going to explore,” MacLellan added. “There’s a couple guys. I don’t know if it’s a deep free-agent market. We’ll talk to other teams and then we’ll evaluate. [Samsonov and Vanecek] have both been pretty good but not great.”
Thought you were referring to Bura.???
I don't think we keep Kuemper but yes, this discussion started with the idea that if we trade Girard we have to keep Manson. We can't keep both.
Pretty much.
I think EJ has shown he can still get it done as a #4 guy, when he's paired with an elite transitional guy like Girard.
If he plays out his contract, which I think he will, we don't need Manson at all. Just get a cheap #6D and this group will be elite once again.
If EJ decides to LTIRetire, then you could look at Manson but certainly nor for 4M+ or 4 years.
Yup, take it with a grain of salt but still good to hear.
If Nuke can get 6M on the open market, I think he signs for 5.5M with us.
Maybe. But maybe not. It's still a big gamble with that contract. 6.4M for 5 years is a big deal for a goalie that has been "the worst goalie in the league after February".From the tweet below it seems like Gibson has started each season decently and then tailed-off. Some might look at this chart and conclude that it's a graph of how much Gibson has cared, and that his stats have dropped as soon as he's realised that Anaheim have had nothing to play for.
Audio of the Nichushkin comments I posted about earlier: