1. There was like one person who denied he had any flaws. Any time you have someone who denies anything needing improvement or only talks about things someone doesn't do well - you ignore that person as they have a bias that won't allow them to paint an accurate picture.
2. Who cares? Every prospect gets compared to elite players. Those are stylistic comparisons and if you drew production and career parallels to that, that's on you for not understanding how player comps work. Shane Wright got compared to Patrice Bergeron and that's f***ing stupid too if you think that Wright would ever sniff a career like Bergeron's.
3. Yeah, he has a lot of tools and he did a lot for Slovakian hockey. He's also a big specimen with those skills. It's clear that's why a lot of hockey people valued him highly. This doesn't mean that a player doesn't need to develop.
4. Yeah you should pump the brakes because outside of one person, most of the discussion was where does he start, the NHL, AHL or OHL because most people understand he wasn't a finished product.. as most 1st overall picks aren't. You have to go back to Matthews to find the last 1st overall who was an instant game changer in their first year. As I told MRB1P, the expectations you are putting on a 1st overall by not reconciling just because one 1st overall is McDavid, doesn't mean they all are. That's on you, buddy.
5. Yes, we should see in training camp because it's a better evaluation. Even if he blows the doors off or he's not ready, neither of those will guarantee anything about his career because he's 18. Imagine writing MacKinnon off after his 3rd season and thinking he's just another Galchenyuk.