Scriptor
Registered User
- Jan 1, 2014
- 8,079
- 5,044
From what I had read, the 10-game rule didn't apply to Slafkovsky, but the 39-game or less rule applied to slide a year towards UFA status.I also thought a year of his ELC would expire whether he played in Laval. However, when I mentioned that, some posters replied with a section of the CBA saying that if he is sent to Laval, his ELC can slide.
Between the two, I think the staving off of the UFA status is more important when trying to keep a winning team together longer. Buying an extra RFA year will always help lower the cap hit on a longer term contract. An 8-year contract that buys up 5 RFA years and only 3 UFA years VS 4 RFA years and 4 UFA years can really impact the price tag of that contract!
Also, the ability to have Slafkovsky play 39 games in the NHL under St-Louis may be more beneficial for his development, depending on the stage of development he is really at (we'll see at Camp). In that sense, it makes the 39-game thing more valuable than the 9-game thing, IMO.