He was very good last year, but IMO not as dominant as the PPG scoring would indicate. I mean, same for Ronning or Gettinger or Brodzinski or whoever. His stats seemed to give the imression that he was dominant night-in, night-out, which he wasn't. Last year was weird; it was a third of a regular season playing against just two teams and watered-down competition as lots of guys had signed up in Europe. Everything in the AHL last year was...off.
I don't know what the big argument is with Barron but if he does become a player in the mold of Brian Boyle, I don't know why that would be a bad thing. Boyle had been a premier bottom-six center and PKer for a decade-plus. If you get that out of Barron, that's a huge win. I've always thought he was more likely to stick at wing, but the Rangers seem committed to him playing center, so that's that, for now anyway. I think he's maybe a future 20-20 guy if it breaks right for him, but more "safely" a 10-15 goal, 25 point guy who plays a good 200-foot game.
He Had a deceptively good shot, just didn’t have the foot speed to create the space needed to use it, if I’m remembering right.Barron seems to have a strong shot and that's something I never really felt Boyle had, so that might lend itself to a little more goal scoring
I could see him getting a taste before going back to the OHL as a "reward" for a good camp, but he's competing for a fourth line spot so it'd almost certainly just be for a cup of coffee and not a season long thing
His stats were better than that but the reason people think he has this untapped offensive upside is because he is a Rangers prospect. Very few people would think of him that way if he was in a different organization.
Barron was a winger in college, why are we assuming he has this untapped offensive upside, at center, no less?
He’s a nice prospect, but if I’m remembering the reviews from our resident Cornell watcher, @coz21, correctly, his upside is Brian Boyle.
Cuylle had some nice moments in the AHL last year but otherwise looked like a fringe player. Unless he's taken some massive steps forward I can't imagine him being ready for the NHL.
Dev camp is a great experience for all the guys. Standing out doesn't necessarily mean anything. Like standing out at Traverse. Obviously you want to see guys stand out against their peers, but doing so doesn't predict any amount of future success.
I like Cuylle but he's a few years away, IMO.
Do they still have the 9 Games rule? If so, does it apply, even?Hot take: Will Cuylle makes the team out of camp and plays at least a handful of games in New York the first couple weeks.
Do they still have the 9 Games rule? If so, does it apply, even?
I think Cuylle did just fine in the AHL last year.
He was. But unfortunately he misses AHL eligibility by 2 games.
Yeah I know and that’s okay.
I thought they said anyone who played in the Ahl last year can go back?He was. But unfortunately he misses AHL eligibility by 2 games.
I thought they said anyone who played in the Ahl last year can go back?
I think he did just fine insofar as he was an 18-year-old who was looking to have a bounce-back season in junior. I mean he showed good flashes and battled hard, although as I'm sure he'd tell you, it was clearly an adjustment for a physical player like him going from OHL to AHL and he struggled at times.I think Cuylle did just fine in the AHL last year.
I do expect he’ll be back in the OHL this year but he should transition next year just fine.
I wonder if this is something that could be appealed. I don’t know if they’d even wish to have Cuylle in the AHL but 20 games seems fairly arbitrary (as opposed to a number that was ‘tooth and nail’ collectively bargained) and possibly - if there’s good reason - something that could be ‘discussed’, so to speak, on a case by case basis.Players who played 20 games, Cuylle only played 18.
I wonder if this is something that could be appealed. I don’t know if they’d even wish to have Cuylle in the AHL but 20 games seems fairly arbitrary (as opposed to a number that was ‘tooth and nail’ collectively bargained) and possibly - if there’s good reason - something that could be ‘discussed’, so to speak, on a case by case basis.
I think he did just fine insofar as he was an 18-year-old who was looking to have a bounce-back season in junior. I mean he showed good flashes and battled hard, although as I'm sure he'd tell you, it was clearly an adjustment for a physical player like him going from OHL to AHL and he struggled at times.
His season was very encouraging, but in context. Like, if there was a scenario where the OHL played last year at the same time as the AHL, and he could have played on whichever the team felt was appropriate, I'm fairly certain based on his development that he would have been back in the OHL.
There is zero reason to rush Cuylle, Othmann, etc. We have quality forward depth for the foreseeable future. And to me that is at bare minimum the next 2 years. Let these kids develop properly at an appropriate pace. We rushed Howden, Lias, and Chytil, and it really didn’t do them any good. Let them marinate.
There is zero reason to rush Cuylle, Othmann, etc. We have quality forward depth for the foreseeable future. And to me that is at bare minimum the next 2 years. Let these kids develop properly at an appropriate pace. We rushed Howden, Lias, and Chytil, and it really didn’t do them any good. Let them marinate.
The ahl exemption is just a one off due to the lost Covid season. I don’t think this anyone is going to lose their mind either way over it.I doubt it. If you put a line in the sand then start making exceptions then where is the line? Cuylle is likely a few years away anyway. I'd gladly let him have hopefully a really strong Junior year then do a year or two in the AHL. The AHL time he's had should only benefit him going forward. He knows what it's like to be a pro, plus when he does go back to the AHL he'll know that he can play there and have some familiarity going in. To me, a big guy like Cuylle who plays more of a mans game shouldn't be rushed.
sorry guys, when does main camp start?