bland
Registered User
- Jul 1, 2004
- 8,242
- 12,606
Nonsense.He's a fringe NHL player who has no place on a winning roster. If he's getting 3rd line minutes, that's a failure by the GM/coach
Nonsense.He's a fringe NHL player who has no place on a winning roster. If he's getting 3rd line minutes, that's a failure by the GM/coach
Yes, because he had a lazy skating stride, an uninformed fan made up a cute name one day, and other fans thought he knew what he was talking about.
It's like when people jumped on the derisive nicknames of Kopitar for several years.
That describes just 1/2 the problem. It's too many undersized stay at home dmen. In both losses the D was just getting run over -- Kings will not contend for a playoff spot until Blake fixes that. Maata and Edler are not the answer and there isn't anything in the pipeline either.I really believe our forwards are fine. I think the biggest problem we have is to many stay at home defensemen. We are having big issues getting out of our zone. I liked Strand and Wolainan puck moving ability as well as being able to find shooting lanes to get the puck to the net. Of course its the defensive end where other players rank better so one sits at Ontario and the other moves to Buffalo. For guys who played Hockey here at higher level than recreational, you know how a defenseman ability to move or carry the puck out of the zone makes your 40 sec shift much fresher in the offensive zone. If your spending 20 sec fighting along the boards to get the puck out your gassed in the offensive zone. At the NHL level there is very little room for players who only play half the ice surface.
Still scratching my head on how Bjornfot couldn't clear that puck which led to the 1st goal....
He did the same thing on an earlier PK, but they didn't score. Just tried to fling it wildly instead of taking a second when there was nobody around, failed to clear it. Thought he had a pretty meh game despite Fox trying to stroke him hard.He never looked up. He just got it, then winged it out to the point. Had he looked up for one second, it's an easy clear. But even before that, the stupid crosscheck with 10 sec to go in the period. There was no need to do it.
If Vilardi needs time in the AHL to regain confidence, he's done. There should be no more excuses for the guy. Time to put up.
Danault is like Stoll, a critical role player on a contending team. We tried Stoll at 2C for years and never got anywhere. The same will happen with Danault, I’m sure.
We really need one of these vaunted forward prospects to have a breakthrough year. They can’t all go the way of Kempe, otherwise we’ll be awful for a very long time.
Its a problem but I wouldnt say they got run over. Its just the team as a whole is soft and plays with minimal intensity and urgency. Vegas is a heavy team and the Kings dominated that game because they played hard. They can win games with this d-core if they really want it.That describes just 1/2 the problem. It's too many undersized stay at home dmen. In both losses the D was just getting run over -- Kings will not contend for a playoff spot until Blake fixes that. Maata and Edler are not the answer and there isn't anything in the pipeline either.
i'm not really feeling like it's a mystery any more, these guys have spent multiple seasons mentally crumbling and allowing backbreaking multiple goal bursts like it's a habit. i'm not gonna sit here and act like i know what the reason for that is, but it sure sounds like that identity/willpower doesn't exist or there's a lack of confidence to show itThe talent infusion was never in doubt but the identity/character/will of this team is still a mystery. It's either that or it just doesn't exist which is also a possibility.
He's a fringe NHL player who has no place on a winning roster. If he's getting 3rd line minutes, that's a failure by the GM/coach
Danault looks great to me. He is playing his role well and making things happen. He is destined to be an elite shutdown defenseman that can make things happen on a contender and his contract is a steal.
What is really failing the Kings ultimately is the kids stepping up. To be brutally honest, none of our young defensemen have looked good whatsoever. Anderson looks outclassed and not ready to be a #2, Bjornfot has been okay but shaky and is clearly inexperienced (although he belongs in the NHL), and Roy and Walker are having growing pains when being put in 3-4 situations. Petersen is also still trying to polish himself into a #1 and lacks the swagger of his predecessor.
Then you look on offense and Vilardi shrinks when the pressure is on, Kempe lacks the vision and finesse to break through on the top 6, Kupari looked raw and unsure of himself, etc etc etc. The Achilles heel of the Kings right now is their youth and inexperience. The kids have to move forward and the Kings really need to throw everything into development. Drafting has been stellar but literally everything rides on whether or not these picks not just pan out but blossom into homerun selections at least once or twice. We may be cursed by injuries, but they can't let that be the excuse. It's tough because everyone wants the kids out there in prime situations to succeed, but all those put in them have faltered or have shown to not really be consistent enough to stick. Will they adapt or die? It will be interesting and fun to see them develop, but we are no doubt going through some serious growing pains.
Why?
His line was very good yesterday. Lizotte is a useful player unfairly maligned here. He is not a problem whatsoever.
That describes just 1/2 the problem. It's too many undersized stay at home dmen. In both losses the D was just getting run over -- Kings will not contend for a playoff spot until Blake fixes that. Maata and Edler are not the answer and there isn't anything in the pipeline either.
I admire his tenacity but he's just can't finish. Like you said he doesn't have the strength, and can get knocked off the puck easily. I think he would be better off in the AHL.Lizotte's biggest attribute is his work ethic. However, he doesn't have the strength to win battles or individual skill to protect the puck and generate offense.
He's not the reason for a line being bad, nor is he a liability. He just has a net neutral impact.
Lizotte's biggest attribute is his work ethic. However, he doesn't have the strength to win battles or individual skill to protect the puck and generate offense.
He's not the reason for a line being bad, nor is he a liability. He just has a net neutral impact.
Lizotte is our new Bylsma, Chartrand, Guiliano, Richardson.
We need to get good enough to force him off the team. We aren't there yet.
Does Giuliano even belong in the same sentence as Giuliano?Bylsma and Richarson do not belong in the same sentence as Chartrand and Giuliano.
For shame.
EDIT: and frankly I'm not even sure Chartrand belongs in the same sentence as Giuliano
Lizotte is our new Bylsma, Chartrand, Guiliano, Richardson.
We need to get good enough to force him off the team. We aren't there yet.
He gets a pass for the 2nd greatest photo in the NHL historyI feel like an opportunity to bring up John Zeiler was missed here.
Not in one game, it’s purely situational and most teams will have a fringe players getting third or even second line minutes on a given night. If after 15-20 games he’s averaging 3rd line minutes it becomes a different conversation.He's a fringe NHL player who has no place on a winning roster. If he's getting 3rd line minutes, that's a failure by the GM/coach