I'd say Byram is certainly in the "Soderstrom tier", to say the least. Ty Smith is pretty good as well.
If you look just at NHLe (in PPG) this season...Not the best opinion I've read today.
All the goals except the Miller empty net:
If you look just at NHLe (in PPG) this season...
Sweden
Lundkvist: 0.45
Soderstrom: 0.38
Sandin: 0.28
Finland
Honka: 0.21
Thomson: 0.20
Heinola: 0.14 (simply took his AHL stats alone since it's between his NHL success and his Liiga failure thus far)
Russia
Zhuravlyov: 0.20
Galenyuk: 0.18
Romanov: 0.09
USA
York: 0.11
Miller: 0.10
Canada
Smith: 0.13
Byram: 0.11
EDIT: NHLe alone isn't the greatest indicator of performance, but it does give a solid overall picture as to the offensive productivity of a certain player. Needless to say that, by comparison, it's not even close that Sweden has the best offensive d-men.
You care to explain this?If you look just at NHLe (in PPG) this season...
Sweden
Lundkvist: 0.45
Soderstrom: 0.38
Sandin: 0.28
Finland
Honka: 0.21
Thomson: 0.20
Heinola: 0.14 (simply took his AHL stats alone since it's between his NHL success and his Liiga failure thus far)
Russia
Zhuravlyov: 0.20
Galenyuk: 0.18
Romanov: 0.09
USA
York: 0.11
Miller: 0.10
Canada
Smith: 0.13
Byram: 0.11
EDIT: NHLe alone isn't the greatest indicator of performance, but it does give a solid overall picture as to the offensive productivity of a certain player. Needless to say that, by comparison, it's not even close that Sweden has the best offensive d-men.
NHLe is nice to look at but it's not an end-all-be-all stat. Like most stats, it lacks context. The SHL, Liiga, and KHL have historically been low scoring leagues and tough for young players to produce. So if the NHLe calculation is going back to say 05-06 that's something to consider. It also doesn't factor in usage. So a guy like Lundkvist playing #1 minutes in the SHL is impressive on it's own, his NHLe may be overstating his true talent level. We're still in SSS territory as well. Byram, Smith, and Addison lapped Thomson last year in the WHL last year for example. So to say those first two guys aren't on his tier is disingenuous. Not to mention scoring in the WHL is down this year. And not to sound like a total homer, but Zamula may be the best offensive threat for Russia and great on the PP, but his NHLe is probably suppressed in comparison to others playing in pro leagues. Cam York led u18 D in scoring last year, is the all-time points leader for D at the u18s, leads 18 year old defensemen in NCAA scoring this year, and leads his college team in scoring as an 18 year old defenseman. To say he's not on a tier with those guys as an offensive threat is crazy to me. Jones and Harris are having very good years. Miller has been productive since Day 1 in college. If you want to say Sweden has the best group of defensemen in the tournament, I'm not going to argue, but to say the US and Canada don't have a single defensemen on the "Soderstrom tier"...c'mon.If you look just at NHLe (in PPG) this season...
Sweden
Lundkvist: 0.45
Soderstrom: 0.38
Sandin: 0.28
Finland
Honka: 0.21
Thomson: 0.20
Heinola: 0.14 (simply took his AHL stats alone since it's between his NHL success and his Liiga failure thus far)
Russia
Zhuravlyov: 0.20
Galenyuk: 0.18
Romanov: 0.09
USA
York: 0.11
Miller: 0.10
Canada
Smith: 0.13
Byram: 0.11
EDIT: NHLe alone isn't the greatest indicator of performance, but it does give a solid overall picture as to the offensive productivity of a certain player. Needless to say that, by comparison, it's not even close that Sweden has the best offensive d-men.
Basically, NHLe converts a player's PPG in a certain league to an NHL equivalent (or NHLe) PPG. It's a factor used to compare production levels across leagues by bringing all players to the same basis level.You care to explain this?
I went to that calculator and entered Byram’s numbers and got a completely different result than yours. Furthermore, though he actually does have slightly down numbers in 19/20, had great numbers last year, including a post-season that saw him lead not just the d-men in scoring, but the entire damn league! So... to make your statement about comparative offensive ability, you’re just going to throw all that out the window?!Basically, NHLe converts a player's PPG in a certain league to an NHL equivalent (or NHLe) PPG. It's a factor used to compare production levels across leagues by bringing all players to the same basis level.
I went to that calculator and entered Byram’s numbers and got a completely different result than yours. Furthermore, though he actually does have slightly down numbers in 19/20, had great numbers last year, including a post-season that saw him lead not just the d-men in scoring, but the entire damn league! So... to make your statement about comparative offensive ability, you’re just going to throw all that out the window?!
EDIT: NHLe alone isn't the greatest indicator of performance, but it does give a solid overall picture as to the offensive productivity of a certain player. Needless to say that, by comparison, it's not even close that Sweden has the best offensive d-men.
Agreed, but it does give a good general idea to a player's production. You can't deny that. No, it doesn't factor in ice time, zone time, or any advanced stat for that matter, but it does give a pretty good high level overview to a player's potential production.It really doesn't. NHLe's never been helpful for anything it's just a way for people to simplify things.
so according to betting sites Gold medal odds
Canada #1
Russia #2
Sweden #3
USA distant 4th tied with Finland, thoughts on this?
Russia should be the favorites. USA are way underrated here, although I don't think we'll win.
Switch Canada and Russia, add USA to co-2nd with Canada, and then I think the rest isn't bad.
how much does international ice surface favour russia in this?
Definitely agree that USA is vastly underrated in this. Probably the most potent offensive lineup in the tournament as well as one of the best goaltenders.Russia should be the favorites. USA are way underrated here, although I don't think we'll win.
Switch Canada and Russia, add USA to co-2nd with Canada, and then I think the rest isn't bad.
Agreed, but it does give a good general idea to a player's production. You can't deny that. No, it doesn't factor in ice time, zone time, or any advanced stat for that matter, but it does give a pretty good high level overview to a player's potential production.
It really doesn't. NHLe's never been helpful for anything it's just a way for people to simplify things.
All the goals except the Miller empty net:
Zegras, Regula and Krygier scratched.
Zegras scratched. Interesting...