Prospect Info: 2020 NHL Draft Part 2
- Thread starter Ducks DVM
- Start date
- Status
bsu
"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
- Sep 27, 2017
- 28,539
- 29,293
Mortal Wombat
Registered User
- Dec 7, 2014
- 2,295
- 1,157
Lundell was also named the captain of Finland's U20 team and will be one of the assistant captains of his Liiga team HIFK. Not bad for an 18-year old and speaks well of his character. He might go in the top 10.
bsu
"I have no idea what I am doing" -Pat VerBleak
- Sep 27, 2017
- 28,539
- 29,293
With the skating he definitely should be projecting higher. He has some nice skill to go with it.
But yes, he does not have the offensive gamebreaking ability that some of the other prospects have which is what we are looking for
Anaheim4ever
Registered User
- Jun 15, 2017
- 9,243
- 5,849
What do people think of 2020 NHL Mock Draft & Simulator | Tankathon ranking of the prospects/mock draft ?
I kinda don't see Askarov getting past both #18 & #20 as NJ could use the 18 or 20 on him as insurance incase Blackwood gets a case of Matt Murray or Steve Mason.
Young goalies could look good one year and then look terrible the next. Blackwood's .915 SV% this year is decent but not great either, he could go either way.
Calgary could also use Askarov too at #19.
I kinda don't see Askarov getting past both #18 & #20 as NJ could use the 18 or 20 on him as insurance incase Blackwood gets a case of Matt Murray or Steve Mason.
Young goalies could look good one year and then look terrible the next. Blackwood's .915 SV% this year is decent but not great either, he could go either way.
Calgary could also use Askarov too at #19.
TopShelfWaterBottle
Registered
- Mar 16, 2014
- 3,432
- 1,452
Ya we have enough two Way players and have really only drafted such got to long and that’s part of the reason we’re in purgatory.
high offense ceiling
I've come to the conclusion that if Rossi is there at 6 the Ducks will pass over him. I just don't see him wowing our old-school style GM. Hope I'm wrong.
Hockey Duckie
Registered User
Here's draft dynasty's video review.
And I would agree to get a finisher to go along with Zegras.
Paul4587
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2006
- 31,199
- 13,215
I have a gut feeling we trade down. If we do draft at 6 I have no idea who we take, there are so many variables.
In terms of want I’m hoping for Rossi/Raymond/Drysdale/Perfetti in that order. At least one will still be there at 6.
- Jul 25, 2012
- 42,560
- 39,405
Rasp
Registered User
- Apr 9, 2019
- 1,334
- 1,932
I'd be open to trading down if it meant we were able to turn 31 into a mid first round pick.
Maybe something like 6+31 for 7+20 from New Jersey plus some balancing done.
I think we need more high end talent. At 6 you have a decent shot and an elite player. You never know when you are gonna hit the next Petterson.
Hockey Duckie
Registered User
Agreed. Also, we already secured another 1st round pick with Boston's 1st round pick. If anything, the Ducks have the ammo to move up with Boston's 1st rounder and our high 2nd rounder as they have already tried to do that in last year's draft to try to steal Peyton Krebs.
I wonder if Boston's 1st round pick and our high 2nd round pick carry more draft capital this year because there's more talented depth in this year's draft compared to last year? Can we sneak higher than 17th overall? A possible trade partner could be the Edmonton Oilers at 14th overall. Edmonton currently possesses four draft selections in this year's draft: 1st rd (14th), 5th rd (137th), 6th rd (168th), and 7th rd (199th). The only hitch in trading up is who exactly is worth a late first and high second round pick at 14th overall? I don't see any prospect save G Askarov worth the two picks in a deep draft. It might behoove us to stay put as there will be a few defensemen and a couple of Germans available with the late first round pick and high second round selection.
But if I were eyeballing on trading up, the Oil might be that team.
WhatTheDuck
9 - 20 - 8
Put 2020 eligible prospects into the following categories, listing each player you could possibly fathom being selected by the Ducks at 6 -
A) Would be absolutely shocked if they are available
B) Players who you would not be surprised to see taken at 6 (if available). Feel free to list in order of preference
C) May be ranked as high as 6 by some teams but can't see Anaheim taking them
D) Players you would be surprised to see go as high as six, but still see some possibility as "reaches", remote as they may be
_______________________________________
A) Lafreniere, Byfield, Stutzle - not happening
B) Raymond, Rossi, Drysdale, Sanderson, Perfetti, Quinn, Holtz, Lundell - I think these are the most viable candidates
C) Askarov - might be on some teams top 5 or 6 but don't see a chance in hell we are one of those teams
D) Jarvis - Never see him ranked high enough to consider him a likely candidate but really like this prospect. Can't shake a feeling that he's the biggest riser on draft day, and that #6 might he his ceiling depending on how things shake down in front of us.
A) Would be absolutely shocked if they are available
B) Players who you would not be surprised to see taken at 6 (if available). Feel free to list in order of preference
C) May be ranked as high as 6 by some teams but can't see Anaheim taking them
D) Players you would be surprised to see go as high as six, but still see some possibility as "reaches", remote as they may be
_______________________________________
A) Lafreniere, Byfield, Stutzle - not happening
B) Raymond, Rossi, Drysdale, Sanderson, Perfetti, Quinn, Holtz, Lundell - I think these are the most viable candidates
C) Askarov - might be on some teams top 5 or 6 but don't see a chance in hell we are one of those teams
D) Jarvis - Never see him ranked high enough to consider him a likely candidate but really like this prospect. Can't shake a feeling that he's the biggest riser on draft day, and that #6 might he his ceiling depending on how things shake down in front of us.
Last edited:
Rasp
Registered User
- Apr 9, 2019
- 1,334
- 1,932
Anaheim4ever
Registered User
- Jun 15, 2017
- 9,243
- 5,849
Jarvis doesn't get enough attention imo. Just imagine if the Ducks got the #15 pick in a trade and Jarvis is somehow there at #15
Also reading that his shot is pretty good and his top speed is pretty good as well to go along with him being extremely agile and he accelerates to his top speed pretty fast.
But i also read some say his top speed is average while some say its great top speed that he has.
I could definitely see the Ducks trading #6 for two mid firsts... especially if someone they like drops.
I'd easily give up #6 for 2 of: Lundell/Rychel/Paterka/Sanderson/Gunler/Wallinder/Jarvis
I'd easily give up #6 for 2 of: Lundell/Rychel/Paterka/Sanderson/Gunler/Wallinder/Jarvis
- Status
