I doubt that the Kings take Askarov. Blyfield has their name written all over him.The unthinkable being the Kings take Askarov, pushing either Byfield or Stutzle down to the Wings?
I think it's a factor, but not as much as Europeans actually playing hockey unlike a lot of NA prospects. I feel that will affect a lot going on in the draft.
Looking further ahead, how much will this upcoming season affect the development of prospects who are now 14-16 years old? If there is no/limited hockey in most junior leagues, will that cause their development to stagnate, and will we see a huge influx of European prospects in 2-4 years in the draft especially in the earlier rounds? Not playing competitive hockey for a full season can kill a career
The unthinkable being the Kings take Askarov, pushing either Byfield or Stutzle down to the Wings?
The unthinkable being the Kings take Askarov, pushing either Byfield or Stutzle down to the Wings?
Sanderson, I believe will be gone top-10. Askarov should but will probably fall out of it.But he's a potential fall guy if Sanderson, Askarov, and/or someone else goes in the top 10.
Were it not for the fact that he is from the Q, I would say his profile seems to fit what Gorton & Quinn are trying to build. But being from Q tends to make me believe that he will not be the choice.Criminally underrating Mercer here. I would absolutely have him in that list of players with the first pick. High intensity, aggressive puck disturber with a knack for creating turnovers. Has a great first pass and very good shot. Plays in all three zones and can transition on a dime while controlling the puck. He's fast and strong. I actually have him as one that might make it in the top 10 for a team starved for talented and skilled forecheckers. Also, he switched between two systems and had an injury. I mentioned this earlier, but if he were on a team like the 67's, he'd have an offensive explosion. In 32 games had 60 points for a PPG of 1.88. His pace is above 2 PPG had he played a full season, while a full season of Quinn on a stacked 67's team gave him 1.44 PPG (albeit 52 goals).
Were it not for the fact that he is from the Q, I would say his profile seems to fit what Gorton & Quinn are trying to build. But being from Q tends to make me believe that he will not be the choice.
I have Perfetti last and at this point, Sanderson and Drysdale are a toss up to me. Gun to head, would probably take Sanderson ahead of him.Sanderson
Perfetti
Rossi
Lundell
Drysdale
In that order.
Well, if they have the top overall pick, then yes.That trend has to stop sometime.
What better time than now?
Were it not for the fact that he is from the Q, I would say his profile seems to fit what Gorton & Quinn are trying to build. But being from Q tends to make me believe that he will not be the choice.
I think that's a narrative that shouldn't be harped on in Mercer's case, especially since the Q had a better season in terms of goals for/against than the OHL did. But simply put, he doesn't play like he's from the Q. Plays a hard working game and earns his points, but also has the skill and smarts to score and set up others. He's an aggressive forechecker and creates a lot of havoc for defenders looking to stretch pass or move up ice.
That trend has to stop sometime.
What better time than now?
Lundell was the third best Corsi player in all of Liiga. That is insane for a pre-draft player in a men’s league. I don’t care that he was #12 on the McKenzie list. Someone is going to take him top 10. One of the Swedes or Rossi will slip.
Lundell was the third best Corsi player in all of Liiga. That is insane for a pre-draft player in a men’s league. I don’t care that he was #12 on the McKenzie list. Someone is going to take him top 10. One of the Swedes or Rossi will slip.
Lundell was the third best Corsi player in all of Liiga. That is insane for a pre-draft player in a men’s league. I don’t care that he was #12 on the McKenzie list. Someone is going to take him top 10. One of the Swedes or Rossi will slip.
TB has a point though, the Rangers have historically avoided the Q in the 1st round like drafting someone from there is going to infect the organization with a mutation of the plague and COVID-19... Plus AIDS.
It's not just Clark, it's decades worth of drafts. I don't know what it is other than short sighted. Plus our scout for that area is pretty good, they should listen to him.
I get that, but this season the Q was a better all around, pro-like hockey than the O was. It was closer in terms to what the W usually is. Nonetheless, they're all still junior leagues. Just saying that there are some players, in this case Mercer, who don't play a juniors like game and despite the Rangers lack of selecting from the Q, they should reconsider if it's for Mercer or Lafreniere even, lolol.
Actually, he was the 2nd best in Liiga this season. That's 2nd best league-wide. No age range, not among draft-eligibles. The only one with a better Corsi% was Puljujärvi this season.
Among draft-eligibles, Lundell is head and shoulders above there rest. It sucks Liiga didn't track this pre-2014. I wish we could see Barkov's stats
![]()
hangover from taking Lucien Deblois or having Morman Rochefort turn into the Sam Bowie of Hockey.TB has a point though, the Rangers have historically avoided the Q in the 1st round like drafting someone from there is going to infect the organization with a mutation of the plague and COVID-19... Plus AIDS.
It's not just Clark, it's decades worth of drafts. I don't know what it is other than short sighted. Plus our scout for that area is pretty good, they should listen to him.
Lundell was the third best Corsi player in all of Liiga. That is insane for a pre-draft player in a men’s league. I don’t care that he was #12 on the McKenzie list. Someone is going to take him top 10. One of the Swedes or Rossi will slip.
Actually, he was the 2nd best in Liiga this season. That's 2nd best league-wide. No age range, not among draft-eligibles.
The only one with a better Corsi% was Puljujärvi this season.