XG said this three days ago:
Coyotes president and CEO Xavier Gutierrez said the team did not run away from selecting Miller.
"Our fundamental mission is to ensure a safe environment -- whether in schools, in our community, in hockey rinks, or in the workplace -- to be free of bullying and racism. When we first learned of Mitchell's story, it would have been easy for us to dismiss him -- many teams did. Instead, we felt it was our responsibility to be a part of the solution in a real way -- not just saying and doing the right things ourselves but ensuring that others are too.
"Given our priorities on diversity and inclusion, we believe that we are in the best position to guide Mitchell into becoming a leader for this cause and preventing bullying and racism now and in the future. As an organization, we have made our expectations very clear to him. We are willing to work with Mitchell and put in the time, effort, and energy and provide him with the necessary resources and platform to confront bullying and racism. This isn't a story about excuses or justifications. It's a story about reflection, growth, and community impact. A true leader finds ways for every person to contribute to the solution. We all need to be a part of the solution."
Gutierrez is a member of the league's Executive Inclusion Council, which is charged with fighting racism and increasing diversity in hockey.
---
It's now abundantly clear that he meant absolutely none of it. Utterly empty words. That means this statement was a complete and total lie. Just damage control. And when it didn't have the desired result, they tucked tail and ran away. Absolutely pathetic.
They have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt this week that they are liars and quitters. They used those words not long ago to describe someone else. Who knew how prophetic they'd end up being. The Meruelo group are liars and quitters.
I'm beyond disgusted by this.
Wasn't this pronounced about someone else?
I think that he should have been on the DND list. Again, this is about what types of decisions you are likely to make. Not just on ice, but off ice. It would also make me question whether or not the player had the judgment skills to do the right thing on the ice, even if as simple as an ill-timed pinch.
My concern is that you were talking about how there would not be any issue with Bill Armstrong not being in charge of this draft, and that the people in place (Jankowski, et al) were allegedly solid enough that Armstrong could trust them. This doesn't sound like this is the case anymore.
I think there is another interview that Armstrong has done where he stated that he likes to see how devoted scouts are to arguing for the player that they want. I think he conveyed the story as being, "if it's in the 5th round, I am going to go with the scout that is fighting the hardest for their player. Because if they are willing to fight that hard for the individual, it must mean they see something in him" (very much paraphrasing here).
That statement concerns me. People have been plenty passionate about ideologies, etc. But being passionate about something does not always equate to successful means. Someone might be passionate about voting being illegitimate. But their response could be to throw a flaming item into a ballot drop box. Passion is great, but passion should not be the only thing relied upon in the final arguments of a player that is deserving of being taken.
I will chalk this up to Armstrong and Jankowski (along with Sullivan, etc.) not being able to have discussions around players and who to have and not have on our DND list. But the last thing the team needed was negative PR any further, and this is exactly what we could not have, under any circumstance.