Iceberg
Registered User
- May 4, 2002
- 4,798
- 1,132
4 months from now:
Eichel set to head to Colorado to take on the Avs in his Minnesota Wild debut
![]()
I'd bet on Vegas.
4 months from now:
Eichel set to head to Colorado to take on the Avs in his Minnesota Wild debut
![]()
My offseason mock:
Protect:
Mackinnon, Landeskog, Rantanen, Burakovsky, Nichuskin, Jost, Saad, Makar, Toews, Graves, Ulmark
Trade:
D- Sam Girard, C- Nazem Kadri, W- Martin Kaut and D- Drew Helleson to Philadelphia for C- Sean Coutourier and LW- Oskar Lindblom
D- Ryan Graves to New Jersey for LW Miles Wood
W- JT Compher to Ottawa for a 2022 4th
Joonas Donskoi selected by Seattle
Sign:
C- Phillip Danault 5 x 5
RW- Blake Coleman 4 x 4.5
G- Linnus Ulmark 3 x 3.75
RD- Jani Hakanpaa 2 x 2.5
LD- Derek Forbort 2 x 2.25
Re-Sign:
Cale Makar 7 x 9.5
Gabe Landeskog 5 x 6.25
Brandon Saad 4 x 4.75
Conor Timmins 1 x 850k
Jonas Johannson 1 x 850k
Tyson Jost 1 x 1.25
Landeskog - Mackinnon - Rantanen
Saad - Coutourier - Burakovsky
Wood - Danault - Coleman
O'Connor - Jost - Nichushkin
Toews - Makar
Byram - Hakanpaa
Forbort - Timmins
Ulmark
Johansson
I fault Bednar more than Sakic.
I don’t know who everyone wanted at the trade deadline. It seemed like the options were pretty limited and Hall chose to go to Boston.
Bednar refused to play Byram and wouldn’t even try Newhook and Soderberg at centre.
Yzerman/Fedorov, Foppa/Sakic, Lecavlier/Richards etc. etcI don't get this line of thinking. So because Edmonton and Toronto are struggling, we can't go big down the middle with a 1/2 punch?
What about the Pittsburgh example? What about Los Angeles with Kopitar/Carter? What about Boston with all their success having Bergeron/Krejci? Washington with Backstrom/Kuznetsov?
Go back even further than that. Detroit with Datsyuk/Zetterberg?
Come on now.
Sakic looks at things situationally. We should know that by now. We don’t need a RD PP specialist. Klingberg is decent 5v5 but not great. He’s at his best on the PP. A team who needs a John Klingberg would easily outbid Sakic who would really only use him as a luxury.
if Sakic is adding a RD it’ll be a 5v5 king who can also PK so that they don’t feel the need to play a Nemeth just because the PK doesn’t have anyone else. An EJ/Larsson is a necessity for Colorado’s back end. Seth Jones is that type but several tiers up and very expensive and will be even more expensive to extend. Manson is a decent.
That doesn’t solve our problem. Getting bigger defenseman is a need.
Again, you cite the Toronto/Edmonton example but there are more examples of the 1/2 punch down the middle working than not working.Eichel will go elsewhere where he'll be the 1C. Trying to be like the Pens is fun until you realize that having 2 superstar centers didn't work in Toronto or Edmonton. It's not guaranteed success.
On top of that the Avs won't allocate 10M of cap hit for the 2C slot during the next 5 years. Not with Makar and Landy and Rants and Mack to pay anyway. That's not realistic.
IMO they keep Kadri for next season then slowly transition to Newhook.
If Sakic does that that means he's not all-in for the next 2 years. A bridge would be much cheaper short term.
Such as? We're talking superstars here.Again, you cite the Toronto/Edmonton example but there are more examples of the 1/2 punch down the middle working than not working.
Look at Tampa. They did everything they could asking their stars to go on bridge contracts just to save a million or two during their window. It matters.A bridge probably saves you a few mil per year, but there’s easier ways the Avs can trim money. Donskoi, Compher, EJ… all overpaid. Makar won’t be overpaid, and he’s a guaranteed stud.
If Sakic does that that means he's not all-in for the next 2 years. A bridge would be much cheaper short term.
Look at Tampa. They did everything they could asking their stars to go on bridge contracts just to save a million or two during their window. It matters.
Crosby/Malkin. Datsyuk/Zetterberg. Bergeron/Krejci. Kopitar/Carter. Kuznetsov/Backstrom.Such as? We're talking superstars here.
It doesn't fit his the world is ending spiel.Again, you cite the Toronto/Edmonton example but there are more examples of the 1/2 punch down the middle working than not working.
You consider Jones to be very expensive right now? His cap hit is $5.4 million.Sakic looks at things situationally. We should know that by now. We don’t need a RD PP specialist. Klingberg is decent 5v5 but not great. He’s at his best on the PP. A team who needs a John Klingberg would easily outbid Sakic who would really only use him as a luxury.
if Sakic is adding a RD it’ll be a 5v5 king who can also PK so that they don’t feel the need to play a Nemeth just because the PK doesn’t have anyone else. An EJ/Larsson is a necessity for Colorado’s back end. Seth Jones is that type but several tiers up and very expensive and will be even more expensive to extend. Manson is a decent.
Even if EJ is healthy (big if) we are talking about a guy whose played 2 games in over a year now? Hes not exactly the youngest guy either. I don't mind having EJ around but I would not be putting him in a top 4 role or any role where hes heavily relied upon for the teams success. Bottom pairing guy who plays 12-15 mins a night on the second PK unit type of thing is fine with me. Its kinda like Calvert. I love the guy but he cant stay healthy so we shouldnt be relying on him playing in the bottom 6 for anything.I've been saying Avs should get Jones, but more I think about it, that's probably not gonna happen. EJ should be healthy next year and we don't know if he can actually stay healthy, but if he can, Avs may not need to make changes on D.
Toews-Makar
Girard-EJ
Byram-Timmins
What Avs need more is better bottom 6 forwards. Get couple of grinders that can provide offense.
????-Newhook-????
LOC-Jost-Nichushkin
Just upgrade the 3rd line. Lose Donskoi to expansion, resign Saad
He meant in terms of the asking price via trade.You consider Jones to be very expensive right now? His cap hit is $5.4 million.
He "may" be very expensive to extend but right now $5.4 million for what he can do seems like a pretty decent number to me.