BleedWell
Registered User
- Jan 6, 2018
- 1,153
- 544
And that's why Sakic had to accuire otherwise completely useless Nemeth back.Dear lord... do you even watch games? G is 3rd on the team in PK minutes...
And that's why Sakic had to accuire otherwise completely useless Nemeth back.Dear lord... do you even watch games? G is 3rd on the team in PK minutes...
In today's NHL, 23+ is #1D level minutes. The days of guys playing 26-27+ are winding down and mostly over save for a select few. Toews and Graves are ahead of him. Makar is behind him.23mins is not 1D minutes. Makar and Toews are ahead of him I assume?
And that's why Sakic had to accuire otherwise completely useless Nemeth back.
Those 3 are all within a minute of each other. Girard is 3rd on the team in PK toi for dmen. All 3 guys played around a 1D level this year. But as I said earlier Girard needs to keep this level up next year to be a legitimate 1D.23mins is not 1D minutes. Makar and Toews are ahead of him I assume?
This level is not enough though. And it's not a knock on Girard. In a team with Makar, Toews and Girard (and soon Byram) he won't get a chance to proof he can be a true 1D.Those 3 are all within a minute of each other. Girard is 3rd on the team in PK toi for dmen. All 3 guys played around a 1D level this year. But as I said earlier Girard needs to keep this level up next year to be a legitimate 1D.
Really? I think what gets even more overrated by some posters is his offensive ability. He has always been quite bad at it regarding his skillset. This season was better but it's still lacking. He's shot is a joke and scares no one. And he still seems confused in the offensive zone.The only thing that I think gets overrated a bit on Girard on our board is his defensive ability. Which is still very good. I just don’t think it’s as high-end as some others do.
No saying I’m right, that’s just my opinion.
Either way... he’s a special player.
Really? I think what gets even more overrated by some posters is his offensive ability. He has always been quite bad at it regarding his skillset This season was better but it's still lacking. He's shot is a joke and scares no one. And he still seems confused in the offensive zone.
All and all very good player but way WAY overrated in our board.
This 1D thing is just pure fantalk.
If Ryan Graves of all the players plays more than Samuel "1D" Girard it tells you something indeedRyan Graves is the true #1D of this team.
Why do you ask? Look at all those PK minutes!!
Really? I think what gets even more overrated by some posters is his offensive ability. He has always been quite bad at it regarding his skillset. This season was better but it's still lacking. He's shot is a joke and scares no one. And he still seems confused in the offensive zone.
All and all very good player but way WAY overrated in our board.
This 1D thing is just pure fantalk.
If Ryan Graves of all the players plays more than Samuel "1D" Girard it tells you something indeed![]()
I'm sorry but that is not how it works.He’s a top-30 defenceman, which is a 1D.
The real question is would you trade Girard for Duchene straight up.
How about if I throw in Bowen Byram
![]()
The definition of a #1 D is very subjective to begin with. One could argue we have three 1D level players.
What part of that makes you think I don't value him on this team?
I would have (and surely did) say that G was limited offensively prior to this season. He went to a completely different level this year. His shot assists, passes to the slots, scoring chance assists... then the raw numbers on assists are through the roof. He was one of the best defensemen at creating opportunities in the offensive zone this year. There were probably 8-12 better than him at this this year, but that is about it. The muffin isn't the case, you're exaggerating. His shot isn't a plus shot, but good enough. 5 goals and 3 irons hit show he can score goals. He's not in the 15+ level, but that ~10g level is there. Combine that with his playmaking and 50+ looks realistic in his game. That's not elite sort of numbers, but pushing top 10 especially when he doesn't get the prime PP minutes.
It is subjective. You could argue we have 3 "1Ds", you could argue we have none - since, as good Makar, Girard, Toews are, Hedman, Pietrangelo, prime Doughty or Keith or Chara, they are not, neither of them anyway, at least for now. Makar will no doubt get there with more experience, though, and the other 2 might as well who knows. If they happen to win the Cup, narratives will change.
That's very true. Girard as a 20 yo single handedly changed the face of our defense. Before him our defense was the laughing stock of the NHL.I still remember when G came in to this team after the Duchene trade and completely changed the way we were able to play in a way EJ and Barrie never could.
That's very true. Girard as a 20 yo single handedly changed the face of our defense. Before him our defense was the laughing stock of the NHL.
What is this nonsense?Your valuing Rantanen, a winger higher than a puck moving D-man on a to die for contract that arguably should be a Norris contender and excels at puck possession and fits JB’s system to a T. High end D, especially when you don’t have them and need them, are next to impossible to acquire from another team except at prohibitively high cost. If you were around for the dark years then you’d understand that. That Sakic acquired Toews for two 2nds was remarkable. I may have my disagreements with Hench on players like Compher but he’s correct about building the team from high end C depth first. Next up is quality D. Wingers like Rantanen, on his contract are incredibly valuable and I wouldn’t trade him either. But no, Rantanen is neither more valuable nor indispensable than Girard in this case. Certainly there was a spell season before this when Girard struggled and I wasn’t happy with his performance. But if you watch him night in and night out, you quickly realize he’s indispensable. Consider them both core players but if I had to choose, you go with D.