Omni Owl
▽
- Mar 9, 2008
- 6,902
- 1,546
Cancer can spread, no thanks. Don't want it to corrupt the youth we have coming up, they need strong leadership right now.
Nearly everyone wanted Voynov back?Blake plays 4-D chess and uses DeAngelo as a team building moment as the young guys rise up to eventually kick him off the team.
As an aside, nearly everyone wanted Voynov reinstated and back on our blueline but nobody wants to touch this kid. I'm not saying they should pick him up or anything but it's just an interesting observation. I bet there are several posters that would be totally fine in picking up a 50 point defenseman on the cheap but don't want to get crushed on here.
Blake plays 4-D chess and uses DeAngelo as a team building moment as the young guys rise up to eventually kick him off the team.
As an aside, nearly everyone wanted Voynov reinstated and back on our blueline but nobody wants to touch this kid. I'm not saying they should pick him up or anything but it's just an interesting observation. I bet there are several posters that would be totally fine in picking up a 50 point defenseman on the cheap but don't want to get crushed on here.
Nearly everyone wanted Voynov back?
Where did you get that? I know there were several, but its the same cast of charachters that get everything wrong, not just social issues.
Absolutely. California’s unusual and overly paternalistic laws and the desire to make an example of Voynov after the Rice situation screwed him royally.The majority of this board wanted him back because the idea was that they could still win Cups. As KF7824 said above, he was also "one of our guys".
I was fine with him coming back for various reasons that we won't rehash.
Nearly everyone wanted Voynov back?
Where did you get that? I know there were several, but its the same cast of charachters that get everything wrong, not just social issues.
Nearly everyone wanted Voynov back?
Where did you get that? I know there were several, but its the same cast of charachters that get everything wrong, not just social issues.
At the risk of splitting hairs between two terrible scenarios, the Voynov incident was an off-ice behavior not a repeated pattern over a decade of on-ice and locker room shenanigans. Not pardoning Voynov, but the NHL has let back plenty of people with arrests and more. ADA is a shitbag to EVERYONE, including teammates.
I don't care to have the discussion about which is universally worse, let's not go there. Just saying from a strictly hockey perspective there would be a reason to look over Voynov's transgressions where there really is just about no glossing over ADAs.
I could not agree more. Not only do the veterans on this team have to be the best players, they have to be the safest players. What concerns me is that McLellan's been here over a year and I'm honestly not sure what system we have in place. You would expect things like breakouts to be automatic at this point, if not in practice then in theory. From what I can tell, the only thing we've really mastered is "defensemen should pinch hard". We all knew this year would be a really rough year and growing pains were expected. I was just expecting them from our young players like Vilardi and Anderson, not Iafallo and Doughty. It should be the veterans covering for the rookies' mistakes, not the other way around.
Why even bring up Voynov? He was drunk and beat up his wife. As far as we know he could have been a good locker room guy so it's not even comparable. We all know Voynov made a huge error. However there were legitimate points to bring him back to the team and give him another chance. And you could have easily argued it the other way.
I don't know if you caught that he got an a brawl after an OT loss with the Rangers goalie who have up the goal?Depends on how you arrive at the reasoning for not picking up DeAngelo: is it bad locker room guy or because of his politics/possible prior racist comments?
To be fair, the majority of the reasoning on here to not get DeAngelo is due to the locker room issue and not because of his beliefs etc...so that doesn't totally equate to the Voynov incident.
Perhaps I remember incorrectly about how so many wanted Voynov back but I'm pretty sure it was a lot of posters and then that number dissipated the further the Kings moved away from relevancy. To say it is revisionist history now seems a bit revisionist to me because it is easy to say there wasn't much support within our fanbase because it's a better story to say that but, really, there was a lot. I was one of them and don't remember being on an island. Main board for sure but not on here.
Anyways, I brought it up because if anyone was cool with Voynov coming back but they don't want DeAngelo because of his Sarnia suspension and Twitter activity then they have a weird ranking system for transgressions. Most everyone here is more worried about the locker room with a young team and weak veteran leadership v. just because he is an asshole.
I don't know if you caught that he got an a brawl after an OT loss with the Rangers goalie who have up the goal?
He also reportedly has a history of doing that after losses
not really sure you can do anything like that, given that they're collectively bargained. i think a player contract is a player contract and you need a material breach ala mike richards to term itI would be okay with deAngelo becoming a king if a few things happen first
a) A talk with Andersson to make sure he has no issues After all he was his team mate for a while.
b) he goes into counselling for senitivity training anger management the works He must pass all theses conditions.
c) no social media at all none
d) maybe see a phycologist for other possible issues
e) the price for him is reasonable ( something along the lines of amadio and a 4th if he plays next year)
You mean like turning Brown into a monster hitting everything in sight?you say that but look at the effect that Sean Avery had on the Kings.
That's not what happened. He actually hurt Brown's growth with his constant bullying of his lisp and saying his wife wasn't pretty enough . I think you also forgot that Laperriere left via FA because of AveryYou mean like turning Brown into a monster hitting everything in sight?
not really sure you can do anything like that, given that they're collectively bargained. i think a player contract is a player contract and you need a material breach ala mike richards to term it
i'm one of those guys that was interested in giving voynov a second chance but doesn't want deangelo mainly because of the fact that all the voynov stuff happened when they were both drunk and he did time for it, and appears at least to be keeping his life clean. deangelo has no excuse. he's spent 15 years being a sober asshole, being punished all the way. he ain't learnin.
I mean ultimately his antics taught the Kings how to grow a pair and do something and gave us some damn entertaining hockey in the process.you say that but look at the effect that Sean Avery had on the Kings.
Depends on how you arrive at the reasoning for not picking up DeAngelo: is it bad locker room guy or because of his politics/possible prior racist comments?
To be fair, the majority of the reasoning on here to not get DeAngelo is due to the locker room issue and not because of his beliefs etc...so that doesn't totally equate to the Voynov incident.
Perhaps I remember incorrectly about how so many wanted Voynov back but I'm pretty sure it was a lot of posters and then that number dissipated the further the Kings moved away from relevancy. To say it is revisionist history now seems a bit revisionist to me because it is easy to say there wasn't much support within our fanbase because it's a better story to say that but, really, there was a lot. I was one of them and don't remember being on an island. Main board for sure but not on here.
Anyways, I brought it up because if anyone was cool with Voynov coming back but they don't want DeAngelo because of his Sarnia suspension and Twitter activity then they have a weird ranking system for transgressions. Most everyone here is more worried about the locker room with a young team and weak veteran leadership v. just because he is an asshole.
You mean like turning Brown into a monster hitting everything in sight?