Bozo Nicholson
5 Alarm Fire™
- Jun 6, 2015
- 6,545
- 7,103
H - E - Double Hockey SticksSwear? Where did I swear? No offense intended, I simply was emphasizing my belief that Cernak easily gets the lowest out of the 3.
You're a bad, bad man.
H - E - Double Hockey SticksSwear? Where did I swear? No offense intended, I simply was emphasizing my belief that Cernak easily gets the lowest out of the 3.
well, it was the emphasis that annoyed meH - E - Double Hockey Sticks
You're a bad, bad man.
Frankly, I don't see Sergachev, Cirelli, and Cernak taking up more than $9 Million of cap space combined... that's top-end IMO. People expecting Sergachev to get an OS paying him $6.5+ Million AAV haven't really been paying attention. Some also forget that for long stretches last season, where all three were playing with their heads up their asses. Sure, they had plenty of times where they played well too. Extraordinarily well in some stretches but they weren't consistent enough to warrant major paydays. That inconsistency will cost them in these deals. Count on that.
I'll bet you we don't trade Cirelli. DM me
Bookmarked this so we can return to it after this washes thru.You obviously haven't been paying much attention to contracts and team space lately if you think these guys are getting much, if anything, over 3 million. You are also the only person that thinks losing Johnson and Killorn vs losing 2 of the 3 rfas is a benefit to the team. Brisebo
Yeah, I don't think he's ever had one good idea about how the Lightning should move forward. I usually just skip over anything he posts at this point.
Man, if we trade Stamkos just so we can keep Killorn I’ll be pissed. That would be pants on head stupid. Injuries or not, I’ll take one legged Stamkos over Killorn every single day.
Just going by what Friedman said in that audio clip, he makes it sounds like they’d be happy to move Stamkos but they’re very opposed to moving Killorn. Which might explain why Killorn hasn’t been moved yet if they’re that intent on keeping him.I dont think it will be to keep killorn. It would be because nobody wanted killorn or tj without us giving a lot to go with it is my suspicion. At least more than we would be willing to give. I honestly don't have too much issue just adding a first to tj to get it done. I dont see why that wouldn't interest some team.
A Stamkos trade just seems... so farfetched.
Cool, you've never provided one good idea to helping the team, and thankfully, the team has never followed your line of thinking. Keeping Johnson and Killorn at the expense of Cirelli and Sergachev is quite possibly the most detrimental thing to the long-term success of this team possible. Killorn would be nice to keep, and there is a scenario where if Brisebois could move Johnson, Paquette and Coburn it might work. More than likely though Brisebois pays the price for Johnson and gets what he can for Killorn after the likes of Hoffman and Dadonov make up their minds, then re-signs the 3 rfa's and hopefully Rutta. Only a GM no longer interested in winning Cups/keeping the team strong would push for keeping Tyler Johnson and Alex Killorn while taking scratch off tickets for players like Sergachev and Cirelli in the hopes that in 3 years when the window is much shorter maybe 1 or 2 of them pay off. Again, so very thankful you have nothing to do with the Lightning's management as then they'd have no Cups and be well on their way to having a lottery pick.Bookmarked this so we can return to it after this washes thru.
Problem is Bob Mckenzie also talked about the Lightning being open to trading Stamkos too, so there’s plenty of smoke going around. They wouldn’t bring it up if it wasn’t something that’s been discussed. Friedman said the Lightning have tried to keep it all quiet so I think that’s the only reason we aren’t hearing more.Exactly. I mean, we bought out VL4 when no one thought he'd never not-be a Bolt. So anything is kinda possible. But I have wonder out loud here. He still has positive value regardless in my mind because (triple knock-on-wood-crusha-jinx) he'd be a LTIR Godsend, wouldn't he?(See Mattias Ohlund). And moving Stamkos in favor of keeping (descending order) Johnson, Killorn, Coburn, Paquette, Gourde, Cernak, Cirelli, or Sergachev?
I mean EF is my #2 most-trusted NHL Insider, so I'm buying into there being smoke=fire. But still...
Problem is Bob Mckenzie also talked about the Lightning being open to trading Stamkos too, so there’s plenty of smoke going around. They wouldn’t bring it up if it wasn’t something that’s been discussed. Friedman said the Lightning have tried to keep it all quiet so I think that’s the only reason we aren’t hearing more.
Part of me is pissed at JBB for even considering trading Stamkos after what we went through with buying out Vinny and then the whole fiasco with Marty. It’s like we can’t ever keep our beloved figures around even while we are enjoying tons of success.
Then part of me is pissed at Stamkos since he has a NMC he could shut all of this down immediately, makes me wonder why the hell he’d be open to leaving at all anyway.
Stamkos to the Kings for a 2nd. He gets a fresh start and can hopefully stay healthy