2019 Season Discussion Thread

[JetsWillFly4Ever]

That feeling when you decide to cut John Ross in a deep league on Sunday morning...

Nooo, I told you Parker haha

 

[bleedblue1223]

Gallup, Sutton, Metcalf, Ronald Jones, Westbrook for rest of season?

 

[tacogeoff]

Was offered the trade of Ingram and Howard (TE) for Kittle and Sony

was thinking of countering with Kittle and Sony for Ingram and Singletray.

I am hurting at RB with currently Sony, Williams and Mack. I picked up TE Andrews off the waiver wire this morning in anticipation of being able to trade him off this week (also have hunter henry on my bench).

So I think it wouldn't hurt me to move Kittle and up my RB depth.

Ingram, Willams (KC), Mack and Singletray w/Andrews or Henry

or

Sony, Williams (KC), Mack and Kittle

WR core of Hilton and Hopkins

 

[bleedblue1223]

If you have Hunter Henry and Mark Andrews, then I'd definitely move Kittle for best RB possible. If you don't get a good enough RB, then do Henry or Andrews. Don't sacrifice your high-end TE just for a depth RB. You drafted Kittle knowing you'd have to sacrifice a bit at either WR or RB.

I don't think Ingram is a big enough upgrade over Sony to move Kittle though. I could maybe see it if you weren't giving Sony, and he or Ingram simply became your RB4.

If that guy wants to upgrade to Kittle, I think he has to take some sort of a hit, and in that deal, he really isn't.

 

[tacogeoff]

If you have Hunter Henry and Mark Andrews, then I'd definitely move Kittle for best RB possible. If you don't get a good enough RB, then do Henry or Andrews. Don't sacrifice your high-end TE just for a depth RB. You drafted Kittle knowing you'd have to sacrifice a bit at either WR or RB.

I don't think Ingram is a big enough upgrade over Sony to move Kittle though. I could maybe see it if you weren't giving Sony, and he or Ingram simply became your RB4.

If that guy wants to upgrade to Kittle, I think he has to take some sort of a hit, and in that deal, he really isn't.

good points. I have shopped Kittle around this morning but there is little interest as "statistically" he struggled last week so people are coming back with low counters.

I will probably try to counter with Andrews for Ingram and go from there. I just wouldn't mind a bit more depth on my RB situation. I also have hunt stashed away but he Is a no factor atm.

 

[Trap Jesus]

When you have a trade proposed for Antonio Brown to someone who is notoriously slow with checking trade offers and are keeping an eye out to cancel it at any given moment...

 

[bleedblue1223]

good points. I have shopped Kittle around this morning but there is little interest as "statistically" he struggled last week so people are coming back with low counters.

I will probably try to counter with Andrews for Ingram and go from there. I just wouldn't mind a bit more depth on my RB situation. I also have hunt stashed away but he Is a no factor atm.

He had 10 targets and 8 catches, he'll be fine. I'd hold Kittle if people think he struggled.

 

[Voight]

Henry out; need a TE.

The best options - Vernon Davis, Tyler Higbee, Brent Jarwin/Jason Witten then you have a guy like Eifert who hasn't done much lately.

 

[bleedblue1223]

Henry out; need a TE.

The best options - Vernon Davis, Tyler Higbee, Brent Jarwin/Jason Witten then you have a guy like Eifert who hasn't done much lately.

I got lucky. Have Henry in 3 leagues, got Kittle in a trade before week 1, and then got Hockenson and Waller in the other 2.

 

[Basement Cat]

Is Henry droppable in the hypothetical/generic instance? Like will I regret dropping him for the Cowboys D/ST which I can play this week and next against Miami? I have Vance and don’t have anyone else more droppable than Henry imo.

 

[bleedblue1223]

Is Henry droppable in the hypothetical/generic instance? Like will I regret dropping him for the Cowboys D/ST which I can play this week and next against Miami? I have Vance and don’t have anyone else more droppable than Henry imo.

If you have a decent replacement, I'd say you can drop him. Ekeler was probably going to steal some of his targets anyway.

 

[rangerssharks414]

Nooo, I told you Parker haha

Ugh

Gallup, Sutton, Metcalf, Ronald Jones, Westbrook for rest of season?

Gallup, Sutton, Metcalf, Westbrook, Jones

Was offered the trade of Ingram and Howard (TE) for Kittle and Sony

was thinking of countering with Kittle and Sony for Ingram and Singletray.

I am hurting at RB with currently Sony, Williams and Mack. I picked up TE Andrews off the waiver wire this morning in anticipation of being able to trade him off this week (also have hunter henry on my bench).

So I think it wouldn't hurt me to move Kittle and up my RB depth.

Ingram, Willams (KC), Mack and Singletray w/Andrews or Henry

or

Sony, Williams (KC), Mack and Kittle

WR core of Hilton and Hopkins

Well, there goes having Hunter Henry...

Henry out; need a TE.

The best options - Vernon Davis, Tyler Higbee, Brent Jarwin/Jason Witten then you have a guy like Eifert who hasn't done much lately.

Davis

Is Henry droppable in the hypothetical/generic instance? Like will I regret dropping him for the Cowboys D/ST which I can play this week and next against Miami? I have Vance and don’t have anyone else more droppable than Henry imo.

I'd just cut your defense and hold for now.

 

[tacogeoff]

Well, there goes having Hunter Henry...



.

He sure did go! that was a quick one and out which is too bad for him on a professional level.

 

[Rodgerwilco]

I was very impressed by Mark Andrews' game on Sunday. I think he's got the potential to be a top TE in the league, especially if Jackson can show more of what we saw from him on Sunday (yes, I know it was against Miami, but still).

 

[BlueSeal]

I'm playing Fantasy Football on Yahoo and someone sent me this trade offer:

Deshaun Watson Miles Sanders	to	THEM
Cam Newton T.Y. Hilton	to	ME

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Thoughts?

 

[Legionnaire]

No.

 

[Voight]

No.... Watson should be in line for a good season, Newton has been meh the last couple years and Hilton likely isn't reaching 1K YDs or more than 5 TD' without Luck.

 

[Rodgerwilco]

Who are your WRs? Unless you are REALLY hurting at WR I’d advise you not to take this trade.

Edit: Even if you’re hurting at WR, trading away Watson to get Cam as your starter is a risky trade-off.

 

[bleedblue1223]

Time for more crazy drops. I wasn't able to get Diggs, I had #2 claim, but the guy who got him dropped Wentz because he already had Watson. I have Jackson. Would you take Wentz over Jackson and would you then try to sell high on Jackson?

 

[bleedblue1223]

I'd pass, I'd only consider it if your WR are terrible, but there are better ways to fix that than trading Watson.

 

[Trap Jesus]

Would you take Wentz over Jackson and would you then try to sell high on Jackson?

Yes to both. Jackson has more upside but Wentz should be a lot more stable.

 

[rangerssharks414]

I'm playing Fantasy Football on Yahoo and someone sent me this trade offer:

Deshaun Watson Miles Sanders	to	THEM
Cam Newton T.Y. Hilton	to	ME

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Thoughts?

Nope

Time for more crazy drops. I wasn't able to get Diggs, I had #2 claim, but the guy who got him dropped Wentz because he already had Watson. I have Jackson. Would you take Wentz over Jackson and would you then try to sell high on Jackson?

Yeah, that seems like a good plan.

 

[Beauner]

would it be dumb to propose Damien Williams and Lockett for Kupp and Aaron Jones? Williams is my 5th RB after McCaffrey, Carson, Jacobs and Ekeler

 

[rangerssharks414]

would it be dumb to propose Damien Williams and Lockett for Kupp and Aaron Jones? Williams is my 5th RB after McCaffrey, Carson, Jacobs and Ekeler

I don't think the other person would go for that.

 

[bleedblue1223]

would it be dumb to propose Damien Williams and Lockett for Kupp and Aaron Jones? Williams is my 5th RB after McCaffrey, Carson, Jacobs and Ekeler

Wouldn't be dumb, but I doubt that offer gets accepted. I thought Williams was over drafted and I think McCoy will eventually get to a 50/50 split and it wouldn't surprise me if McCoy wins more touches.

I'd probably lean Kupp over Lockett too. They are the exact opposite in my mind. Lockett is big play/TD dependent with his low target volume. Kupp is safe, but gets red-zone targets, so he'll still get TDs.