Striiker
Former Flyers Fan
You are being extremely generous with 60%.
Local coverage guys would barely watch outside of their own teams, national guys in Canada are only focused on the Canadian teams and I would be surprised if the national guys in the US watch more than a handful of games by teams outside the major markets.
I would guess a pretty healthy majority of writers who get to vote are grossly unqualified to do so based on what they actually watch. Most probably are heavily reliant on stats with minimal viewings of the players.
I mean, the writers vote on the Selke. How many writers actually watch enough of Barkov to have a legitimate grasp on his game? How many writers in the east actually watch the Kings to evaluate Kopitar?
It may be their job to watch hockey, but there's no way anyone is watching enough of all 31 teams to properly evaluate something like a Selke winner. Classic popularity contest award, but at least it seems like Couts is a pretty popular kid these days.
Uhh ohh... you better be careful because you're starting to sound like me
Going along with that hypothetical number, even 40% can be the difference between the right choice and the wrong choice, even if the other 60% are responsible and do their homework.
But personally, I think you’re being optimistic/generous. I think there’s a very small handful of good voters but the majority are idiots like our beats. I don’t buy for a second that the average local media guys are doing their homework and watching a significant sample of other top players. I think most go along with hype, reputations, storylines, and basic stats.