Are they? They traded Toffoli, Muzzin, Martinez, Campbell, Pearson, and a few more. Did they keep all of them for too long?
Yeah, probably. That, or we just got tired of them because they, or the team, were done living up to expectations. At that point, it was ok, just flush them all out. However, the hard cap world makes that a long process. As usual, term is the issue. The more years on a contract, the tougher it is to get rid of them, unless you're taking back an equally bad contract, which was Gaborik/Phaneuf, but it didn't do much, other than moving some stuff around to see if a different combo works, instead of actually changing anything.
Although I would disagree that the Kings,
right now, are the worst team at identifying expiration dates on players. They're not that team anymore. Their last mistakes in that regard were in July 2018. They finally corrected one of them, can't do anything about the other one, but they haven't done anything like that since. And then relatively quickly saw that whatever it was they were trying to do wasn't working, and have done what the could realistically do over the course of 2 years to fix the problems. Or, they haven't fixed anything yet, but they've given themselves a cleaner slate to potentially work the problems out.
Bingo. In my eyes Iafallo is JW lite. Kopi works great with a hustle players, that are willing to go in and cause havoc. These players also need to have decent puck skills (like JW did, and Iafallo and Brown have just at a lesser level). Its why Lewis is never a permanent solution on that line, because while he possesses 2 of the traits needed, his puck skills are non-existent.
Its why I don't think a player like Kaliyev will not work with Kopitar, but a player like Thomas or Fagemo would. (or Turcotte)
But I've digressed. While i do not think Iafallo is a "first line" player, does not mean he can't play on the first line. Most competitors do not have 6 top 6 players in their top 6 (does that make sense?). Teams have different combo's that work, and balance their line ups so they have 3 quality lines or 2 great ones. When doing that, you occasionally having a player play "above their role". Right now that is Iafallo. Ideally? When the Kings are competing again, he bounces between the second and third line. And he is a player that brings consistent numbers are a good contract. And separates cup winners from teams like the Oilers that have great players and AHL'ers.
Everything with Iafallo comes down to his next contract. Unfortunately he's going to already be 27 in Dec. He's in that age range where players usually start turning the corner onto the downside of the production slope, but he's also in that age range where damn it, he's still young enough where it's temping to give him a 5/6 year deal, and please just give me 2 or 3 more years of what you've been doing.
Since he's probably not going to be part of the core that hopefully puts the Kings back in the conversation though, is he worth investing in? Are the Kings at the point yet where they should start doing that? Have they identified the core yet? We sort of have an idea, if Vilardi remains healthy, Turcotte, whoever they take #2, maybe Petersen, but there are very few NHL games in that group, so I'm not sure they can know for certain yet. If Iafallo is a placeholder on the top line, is a long term deal something to give someone who you ideally see somewhere in the maybe 5th-9th forward slots?
Iafallo will be tricky. He's sort of the first contract test in the real post-Lombardi era. Kovalchuk was in the they still think they can compete with the Cup core running the show category. I don't think it'll make or break the team if they give him a decent sized contract, but because he's going to be 27, and because he's not quite good enough, but looks like he could be a solid role player on a good team, you don't want to just hand him a deal because well, there's nobody else to pay around here for the next few years.