Toronto lost Leonard but they tried to keep him.
I would rather Pay the guys who LA won with then go the way of the Marlins.
When the contracts were given the only one I did not like was Gaboriks, but even then he was coming off an amazing playoffs but I just knew it meant the end of Williams (may have left anyway), and also I hated the term on it.
Leonard chose to leave. There was basically nothing, if anything, Toronto could do to keep him. It would've been great if Doughty forced the Kings hand like that, but he didn't. He was more than willing to stay(assuming the money was good). I doubt it would've helped, but had the 18-19 season happened in 17-18 instead, maybe Doughty can't leave fast enough.
Why is this a binary choice? The Kings didn't have to become the Marlins of the NHL. I would rather the Kings not be paying Doughty and Kopitar into their late thirties.
I don't know how many would disagree with that. Unfortunately, the cap doesn't allow you to pay guys $25m a year for a couple years as a thank you for winning. It has to be stretched out over too long a period of time.
Again, I don't need to name the team. Dozens of teams in major league sports do it incorrectly. The NHL is a young man's league. You don't win with your highest paid players being a bunch of 30-somethings. Chicago and LA are proving it. I said the Toews and Kane contracts were a bad idea when they signed them, and the Kings followed suit with two deals that made no sense based on the situation the roster was in at the time.
That's undeniably true. However, those contracts weren't about winning. They were about having won. At least it came with winning, and we're not having to complain about a Jamie Benn type situation.
In sports, if you win, you pay your players. That's why dozens of teams have done it incorrectly. That's pretty much how the business works. Certainly with the best players, sometimes even the lesser talents. That's it. Doesn't matter if it's good or bad, in the short or long term. Yes, a random veteran who has been around forever could easily do exactly what Kopitar/etc do in terms of showing young guys what it means to be a pro. Just being part of the elite that make the NHL is enough for players to listen, you don't have to come to the discussion with a ring to have credibility. That's not why they were re-signed though.
And it's also unfair for teams to expect fans to pay top dollar while a team sucks because they handed out stupid contracts to players that have passed their best by date.
Doughty will be the last guy to get a new contract(other than Kovalchuk, but that was a second GM getting screwed over again by a former championship core). They're now slowly working within the confines of the cap to move on from the past. Everything started too late, but DL should've started the rebuilding process during the 14-15 season. It was over then, 2 years later was too late as well. What's done is done. All they can do at this point is chip away a little at a time. There are obstacles, self imposed obstacles, but they're moving in the right direction, and have been for almost a calendar year.
We want the team to move on from the past, and we fans also have to let the past go. Anything that happened before the Pearson trade should be irrelevant, because none of it can be changed. Nov 14th, 2018 was the true start of a new era. Blake hasn't traded any picks or prospects since getting the job, but 11/14/18 was acceptance of reality.