I've seen Petry as a comp for Dobson, and I think that's a pretty middle of the road comp.
If you look at the mock, we're getting some real good players with those two high 2nds. They just can't **** it up.
I'm wondering how MB's job security will affect the #3 selection. It stands to reason that if the GM wants to keep his job, the Habs will draft a player that provides immediate help. It that's the case, Zadina is a stone-cold lock—unless Montreal finds a way to trade up to #2 and get Svechnikov.
Does this mean that the Habs are unlikely to go after a first-rounder with a higher ceiling but who will take a few years to get to the NHL?
I'm wondering how MB's job security will affect the #3 selection. It stands to reason that if the GM wants to keep his job, the Habs will draft a player that provides immediate help. It that's the case, Zadina is a stone-cold lock—unless Montreal finds a way to trade up to #2 and get Svechnikov.
Does this mean that the Habs are unlikely to go after a first-rounder with a higher ceiling but who will take a few years to get to the NHL?
The Merkley pick in the mock reminded me how flawed a player he is. Not only in fundamentals, but offensively too. NHLers won't get caught by the same moves over and over (actually, AHLers won't either). He's learning-adverse and it's been so apparent this year in how little he's worked on his issues. The team that picks him better do their due diligence with the interviews and speaking with teammates/coaches, whatever info they can get that'll give them hope he'll approach the game like a pro. If not, its throwing a high pick in the garbage.
If they draft Merkley everything they said about character and attitude is complete garbage.While he certainly has flaws, I’d say they are coachable (as long as he’s open to the coaching). You make it seem like he’s completely predictable out there, which I don’t think is the case at all.
I mean I don’t see any reason why he should go 15 spots after Bode Wilde. That guy is as dumb as a bag of bricks. At least Merkley shows he can dominate, he just needs to drive himself to do it consistently.
Dont they hold the Memorial cup next year? Thats a pretty good reason to say he isnt ready... If we draft Zadina and he trains with some of our vets, he might be NHL ready or close to be... Dobson is definitely not NHL ready, his skills are too raw and he still have to fill his frame, that would be dumb to rush him no matter who draft him...Just so you know, Halifax's own staff said that they don't think Zadina is NHL ready next year. I mean that can change with a whole off season to train but I tend I to agree with them. I don't think Zadina or Tkachuk should be in the NHL next year. Dobson could probably play but that would be rushing a D which is usually trouble.
If they draft Merkley everything they said about character and attitude is complete garbage.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)What excites me the most about him are the width of his shoulders.
What excites me the most about him going forward are the width of his shoulders.
None of us really know the whole story, but it's relatively common knowledge that he has top of the draft skill but it's his attitude/coachability that is dragging him down the draft rankings. I'm not saying I wouldn't take a chance personally, but it would be totally out of line with what the organization has been saying for years with regards to attitude and character. Once again not saying that I necessarily agree with that philosophy.While I agree this is Merkley now, if he is coachable, we have to remember he really is just a kid. Sure, if this were him at age 25, maybe we’ll pass.
I’m only saying this based on what I’ve seen and scouting reports. Like others have said, if there is an interest in him from the team, I hope they do their due diligence because I obviously don’t have the whole story.
None of us really know the whole story, but it's relatively common knowledge that he has top of the draft skill but it's his attitude/coachability that is dragging him down the draft rankings. I'm not saying I wouldn't take a chance personally, but it would be totally out of line with what the organization has been saying for years with regards to attitude and character. Once again not saying that I necessarily agree with that philosophy.
Veleno sucks a lot.
I respectfully disagree. If you have to have doubts about a Q centerman, have your doubts on Groulx. Not on Veleno.
What excites me the most about him going forward are the width of his shoulders. .
I respectfully disagree. If you have to have doubts about a Q centerman, have your doubts on Groulx. Not on Veleno.
And for my friend WTK, while i LOVE Wahlstrom, I don't see how Wahlstrom goes ahead of Zadina. 2 pure snipers, yet Zadina has the upper hands in his passing skills and defensive play. Not by a lot, but as of now, there is a difference. Now, it's all about projection so I guess the evaluation is about projecting that Wahlstrom will be more north-south type of player......while Zadina becomes more east-west....if so, yeah, Wahlstrom has the upper hand. But I don't think Zadina walks away when the physical stuff happens.
Groulx is also not very good, and of course, I do not have Groulx ahead or near Veleno. But holy hell, Veleno has very little offensive IQ, and one of the worst shots I've seen on a first round prospect.
Groulx is also not very good, and of course, I do not have Groulx ahead or near Veleno. But holy hell, Veleno has very little offensive IQ, and one of the worst shots I've seen on a first round prospect.