2018 NHL Entry Draft Thread (Less then 24 Hours Edition)

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
But it raises his value because you look at it from a needs standpoint.

If we were the Edmonton Oilers, would we want Zadina or Kotakaniemi? It wouldn't be a question, because they already have 3 great NHL centres.

No professional scouting service has Kotkaniemi above Zadina. I think his value rose as well, but not enough to pass Zadina.

Nope. Centers are more valuable than wingers as a general rule. Just like centers are more valuable than goaltenders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings
You are slighting Zadina when you call him a meh prospect. Just cause you are high on Svechnikov and his 44 games, it don't mean there is a major drop from him to Zadina. I think there is a gap but it's nowhere near as big as you are presenting. That is my point.

You want to talk about what each player can do when the playing field is even (you compared QMJHL vs OHL)... Svechnikov scored 2 goals in 7 games while Zadina scored 7 goals in 7 games in the U20 World Juniors. Zadina scored 2 goals and Svechnikov didn't score in the prospects game. Does this mean Zadina is better? NO! What it does show you is how these two perform when the competition gets better though! ;)

Fast forward a few years from now and I don't see much difference between these two. Edge goes to Svechnikov for sure but the gap is not significant.
Nobody said that Zadina is a meh prospect. He is still a bluechip prospect. He is just nowhere near Svechnikov in any way. All you do in their comparison is bring up irrelevant U20 and prospect games that don't mean anything.
 
Nah this team needs a game breaker at forward, Svechnikov was exactly that. Boqvist is nice and most likely my pick at #3 with Zadina/Kotkaniemi/Wahlstrom really close behind but the Habs havent had a dominant forward since Kovalev that one year and before that it was Koivu that one year... and before that it was Lafleur.... bout time we get one of the forward.


I feel your pain.

I wish I could get behind Boqvist more. Was he just particularly boring at the U-18's? I think I watched 3 or 4 games and was impressed for a bit of the Canada game.
 
Explain how 11 goals over 82 games is not significant. He was over gpg without his hand injury.

Because you can't prorate stats to be a sure thing over a 82 game schedule. How about Zadina's 7 goals in 7 games in the U20 World Juniors while Svechnikov scored 2 in 7 games? The gap between these two is not significant.
 
I feel your pain.

I wish I could get behind Boqvist more. Was he just particularly boring at the U-18's? I think I watched 3 or 4 games and was impressed for a bit of the Canada game.

Boqvist is impressive because of his smarts. In all of his U-18 games, I don't think anyone pressured him once. He made the right play almost every time. When he went on offense, when something didn't work, he already had the foresight to know how it wouldn't work and was back to cover it up almost immediately.
 
Nope. Centers are more valuable than wingers as a general rule. Just like centers are more valuable than goaltenders.

If they are equal in everything else, sure. It doesn't mean I'd want Byron Froese over Nikita Kucherov.

You know who was just in the Finnish league and became a #1 centre in the NHL? Barkov. You know what Barkov did his draft year? 20 more points than Kotkaniemi, playing as a centre the entire year and he didn't disappear in the playoffs like Kotkaniemi. He's a better skater and a better playmaker. I don't see 1C upside with the kid.

The fact remains everyone in the professional ranks, every single person, has Zadina over Kotkaniemi. You have to draft the best player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77
Nobody said that Zadina is a meh prospect. He is still a bluechip prospect. He is just nowhere near Svechnikov in any way. All you do in their comparison is bring up irrelevant U20 and prospect games that don't mean anything.

Im kinda demoralized... the 3rd pick is just... meh...

Zadina.... wahlstrom... they both have too much meh going on.

Boqvist would be nice, but he doesnt fit a need or give the habs an elite forward like Svechnikov does.

The Great Schlemko... Here you go! Be careful when you say "Nobody"
 
If they are equal in everything else, sure. It doesn't mean I'd want Byron Froese over Nikita Kucherov.

You know who was just in the Finnish league and became a #1 centre in the NHL? Barkov. You know what Barkov did his draft year? 20 more points than Kotkaniemi, playing as a centre the entire year and he didn't disappear in the playoffs like Kotkaniemi. He's a better skater and a better playmaker. I don't see 1C upside with the kid.

But then youre actually taking the best case scenario. Barkov is a top 10, if not 5 in this league. Can we start with top 30?
 
Because you can't prorate stats to be a sure thing over a 82 game schedule. How about Zadina's 7 goals in 7 games in the U20 World Juniors while Svechnikov scored 2 in 7 games? The gap between these two is not significant.
Svech was recovering from an injury, and he never played the amount that Zadina did. The Russian coach never plays younger guys.
 
Good points but it don't mean that Svechnikov scores 62 goals in 68 games (prorated). I have him as the #2 ranked guy but Zadina is not significantly behind him.
No matter how many times you repeat this, it will not make it true. This draft is similar to 2016, theres a clear separation between one and two and a drop off drom 2 and 3.
 
The Great Schlemko... Here you go! Be careful when you say "Nobody"

I think you're taking the "meh" too literal. I mean, maybe Mrb1p meant Zadina is meh (I can't speak for him and don't want to imply that was his meaning), but I interpret it more like how a lot of people really wanted #1, and obviously if not #1, then #2. Getting #3 after a 2 hour wait was kind of demoralizing. I mean, it is kind of like when I was worried about getting #6 or #7, which is Dobson territory. I really like Dobson a lot, but he'd be kind of a let down if potentially Hughes or Wahlstrom were still on the board.

Same goes with Tkachuk. I don't think he is a bad prospect at all, but after the gong show this season, I kind of what something that goes against the team's past way of thinking.

Anyhow, won't debate the word "meh" was used, but I don't think anyone actually thinks Zadina is "meh".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrb1p
Because you can't prorate stats to be a sure thing over a 82 game schedule. How about Zadina's 7 goals in 7 games in the U20 World Juniors while Svechnikov scored 2 in 7 games? The gap between these two is not significant.

The one where Zadina was outscored by Brady Tkachuk ?

How about this: Zadina had the best center in the tourney (with Mittelstadt) and given prime ice time from the get go.

Svechnikov was coming back from a broken hand, playing for a coach that never plays 17 year olds. He was played on the fourth line yet still put up ppg. Only 1 Russian (Kostin) managed to out-ppg him.

That's what you call an even playing field ? Come on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77 and Mrb1p
I'd rather have a shot at the lottery next year, with two picks. But again, that comes down to two things: The likelihood Patches is moved for futures (less than 10% IMO) and who's still gonna be on the board.

If you're suggesting a low percentage for Patches in a futures alone return, then the odds are probably zero.

However, based on what was being reported prior to the TDL, they were looking for a player, top pick and prospect. Even if we assume that the Habs' demands were exaggerated or even if Pacioretty's potential return would have been better at the TDL than now, there is a better than 50% chance in my view that a top pick is included in a return for him.
 
If you're suggesting a low percentage for Patches in a futures alone return, then the odds are probably zero.

However, based on what was being reported prior to the TDL, they were looking for a player, top pick and prospect. Even if we assume that the Habs' demands were exaggerated or even if Pacioretty's potential return would have been better at the TDL than now, there is a better than 50% chance in my view that a top pick is included in a return for him.

I think theres a new air of desperation around MB with all the changes to his buddies in his staff and the likelihood he's canned if it goes bad again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runner77
Svechnikov played 4th line and had no PP yet produced at a PPG clip in the WJC. Tell me more.

This is your angle of the debate:

Everything Zadina did well this year: It don't matter

Everything Svechnikov did well this year: It means he should be compared to McDavid

Svechnikov > Zadina. However Zadina is not a "meh" prospect and the gap between these two is not significant
 
What do you guys think of Simon Johansson? Was just scouring through eliteprospects a bit and his name came up, intriguing size and stats but I haven't seen him play.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad