ProspectsSTC
Registered User
- Jul 12, 2014
- 3,474
- 2,021
How about a D who puts the puck in the net?I don't want a ****ing D gimme a guy who puts the puck in the net. Now.
Stop ****ing with us Timmins.
#Boqvist
How about a D who puts the puck in the net?I don't want a ****ing D gimme a guy who puts the puck in the net. Now.
Stop ****ing with us Timmins.
Who said this draft is average? It's deep isn't it?
That was my point. Trading for picks isn't that difficult. Tatar got back a 1st, 2nd and 3rd at the deadline. But you have to actually draft well. The Lucic deal was fine, but Boston traded a building block piece for a 1st and two 2nds, none of which looked great even at the time.
This draft is considered average, not very good.
Hayton is not "way too high."
I've actually watched him live several times.
There's something to be said for not just his skill, but his consistency.
Playing as well as he did in the playoffs - three tough and physical series - allows for better evaluation than any Under-18 tourney can.
The U-18s are non-contact by comparison.
He's way undervalued on this board.
The draft will bear it out, too.
Carlo is a force, MacAvoy is a force, Debrusk with 43 pats in his rookie season, 6 goals in 12 playoff games. As for Hamilton, he didn’t want to be a Bruin so considering, they did well.Carlo is a stay at home D-man. DeBrusk is a good middle 6 winger. McAvoy is really good. They also didn't need to make those trades to get any of those guys. Particularly the Hamilton trade, which still looks as awful as it did when they made the trade.
Boston bounced back because they have the best top line in hockey, a good goalie, good center depth and enough D to get by. They didn't bounce back because they made good trades around Lucic and then mostly bungled the picks they got or because they traded a really young top pair D-man for cheap.
How about a D who puts the puck in the net?
#Boqvist
there goona f this draft up...
waaaaay too small with our current roaster... Imagine the roaster in 5 years how small they would be, fleury/mete/boqvist/brook top 4 and avg of 5'11
Trevor T said the other day , size doesn't matter....
Until he is gone , will be smurfs ..about he size of it ...
waaaaay too small with our current roaster... Imagine the roaster in 5 years how small they would be, fleury/mete/boqvist/brook top 4 and avg of 5'11
( still a freaking insanely talented D roaster, now let's hope Bergy don't trade any of them..)
That was my point. Trading for picks isn't that difficult. Tatar got back a 1st, 2nd and 3rd at the deadline. But you have to actually draft well. The Lucic deal was fine, but Boston traded a building block piece for a 1st and two 2nds, none of which looked great even at the time.
This draft is considered average, not very good.
The whole narrative of this and the wizardry of this is the fact that they DID have the balls to trade Lucic. We're talking about the best power forward at the time in the NHL, a huge fan favorite but what they also saw was an aging player, while young had huge mileage on his body. They were extremely smart not to commit long term, rarely such players stay in their prime post 30. RARELY.
I'd love to see our brain damaged GM have the balls to trade Weber which is in the same place now. It's now or never.
Why would they be worried about the current roster when he won't be in his prime for 6 years. What the current roster is, should have zero effect on your draft choices. If it did (like it has recently, idiotically), Gainey wouldn't have taken Carey Price at 5.
it does when you are choosing Between 2 ridiculously talented D guy - Dobson or Boqvist. As much as I love Boqvist and his speed I don't think he would fit well in Montreal
Bergy is more interested to know hpw he does in NHL 18How is Zadina in Fortnite? The ultimate test for a prospect.
LinkBergy is more interested to know hpw he does in NHL 18
Lets say we use the Sens and Coyotes against each other and our plan is to take either Dobson or Kotkaniemi. Work a deal with the Coyotes if they want Zadina bad so we screw over the Sens and we get a 2019 2nd in the process. The deal would be that the Coyetes take Zadina. Then we see what the Sens do and I seriously doubt they go after Kotkaniemi. If they do, we have plenty of other options... Dobson, Boqvist, Wahlstrom, Tkachuk.
Tell the Sens we are trading down to the Coyotes cause we are not taking Zadina. If they want to beat the Coyetes offer, let them try.
If Boqvist is more skilled and a better skater than you take him and vice versa. If they project to be equal (in Timmins' mind) than you take the bigger size, I agree. However, it's pointless cause they're taking Zadina or Kotkianiemi. I checked with Miss Cleo, and it be true.
And you can see the ressemblance between PK and Boqvist playstyle.... And It didn't end that well for our boy PK