Mrb1p
PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Well, if you ignore the tremendous development he had in his draft year, that might hold true.He's definitely going to be a great case study in regards to post draft development.
Well, if you ignore the tremendous development he had in his draft year, that might hold true.He's definitely going to be a great case study in regards to post draft development.
Hawks look like a safe bet to take a D-man.
I'm talking from a skating standpoint ie the knee injury/skinny legs theory that NP wrote of, in addition to the skating coach benefit.Well, if you ignore the tremendous development he had in his draft year, that might hold true.
As much as I want Boqvist (still #3 on my list and first choice for us), I think the chances of Tavares coming to Montreal with a sub-$9m cap hit are higher than us picking Boqvist.
How would you know ? Every team could use an asset like Kotkaniemi. Its not a depth chart thing.I'm not sure. Just looking at the top 11/12, I think the Wings, Blackhawks, and Islanders are possible teams that can take Kotkaniemi. I'd be willing to gamble all the rest in the top 12 don't take Kotkaniemi.
How would you know ? Every team could use an asset like Kotkaniemi. Its not a depth chart thing.
Montreal, Ottawa, Arizona, Detroit, Vancouver, Chicago, NYR, NYI, Dallas all need a center of Kotkaniemis type in their pool, Especially the first seven. The only team that I see firmly passing on a center is Edmonton, and thats mostly because theyre dumb and they really need D.
2013 I would say: lets draft big fast players...2013: Let's draft for size.
2018: Let's draft for speed.
2023: Let's draft for players with no size nor speed.
![]()
#ONESTEPAHEAD #4DCHESS
How would you know ? Every team could use an asset like Kotkaniemi. Its not a depth chart thing.
Montreal, Ottawa, Arizona, Detroit, Vancouver, Chicago, NYR, NYI, Dallas all need a center of Kotkaniemis type in their pool, Especially the first seven. The only team that I see firmly passing on a center is Edmonton, and thats mostly because theyre dumb and they really need D.
Man from those hints from Timmins (skating and character matter more than size and the longterm project philosophy) and Zadina's (They're going for D or Center) I get the feeling the Habs will pick Hughes.
He's a dynamic player, NCAA tested (what Timmins tend to like). We probably have the best player to help him develop (In Weber).
The fact that they talked about him and Dellandrea is a pretty clear indication that they don't give a shit about the center theory @ToLegitToQuit proposes.I get the impression that Vancouver is not that interested. Just a hunch from that draft list meeting video, but they were pretty clearly talking about Kotkaniemi at first, and two of the scouts didn't really seem to feel it.
Oh man we're actually going to take Kotkaniemi at 3 aren't we lol
I know it's a stretch but Ty Smith fits that bill as well.Man from those hints from Timmins (skating and character matter more than size and the longterm project philosophy) and Zadina's (They're going for D or Center) I get the feeling the Habs will pick Hughes.
He's a dynamic player, NCAA tested (what Timmins tend to like). We probably have the best player to help him develop (In Weber).
The fact that they talked about him and Dellandrea is a pretty clear indication that they don't give a **** about the center theory @ToLegitToQuit proposes.
I have to think Kotkaniemi now, thats superb. I'm actually hyped for the draft. Kotkaniemi or Boqvist babi
I'm sure you'll get over it in no time. By the time he puts that Habs jersey on, he'll be the best center prospect not in the NHL.Oh man we're actually going to take Kotkaniemi at 3 aren't we lol
The Zadina comment looks good.Sorry, but why do you think we're drafting Kotkaniemi now?
Can't lose face though, so he probably wont and hell get the Galchenyuk treatment.I'm sure you'll get over it in no time. By the time he puts that Habs jersey on, he'll be the best center prospect not in the NHL.
I'm wondering if it's actual information he got or just quickly glanced at our team and saw the only person in Montreal who's not a winger was Graham Rynbend and just assumed we wouldn't take another.The Zadina comment looks good.
Can't lose face though, so he probably wont and hell get the Galchenyuk treatment.
Also, can't wait for the smear campaign to start on the main board. Watch the player we draft suddenly become a huge project, a long shot, flawed, etc.
Okay I laughed at Rynbend, probably harder than I should've.I'm wondering if it's actual information he got or just quickly glanced at our team and saw the only person in Montreal who's not a winger was Graham Rynbend and just assumed we wouldn't take another.
Oh man we're actually going to take Kotkaniemi at 3 aren't we lol