NotProkofievian
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2011
- 24,978
- 25,651
Well, no one watches Peterborough so...
And he's little and Russian. Plus, clearly not a hockey name. Bust.
Well, no one watches Peterborough so...
It’s not disingenuous. How many top line wingers have been traded for centres recently? Even three years ago I doubt you could trade Max for a good centre. You’re more likely to trade a top defender for one. Need for a need.
Look at it this way. Take Pacioretty coming out of his 2014-2016 -- and even 2017 seasons. Take any one, the earlier the better. All of them productive. All of them still offering term. And all of them placing him within the top 10 or better goal getters in the league. Tell me how that kind of profile doesn't beget a shot at a top 6 center.
Now, that's not what your post is saying. It's claiming that he has that profile right now, coming off a bad season, with little term left on his contract and nearing 30 years old. And with the acquiring team facing a large salary commitment. And you're wondering how come the kind of profile he has now, doesn't beget a top 6C.
Pronman has Kotkaniemi 4th. I’m almost convinced he’s going to get picked by the Habs. Too desperate for a centre. Think about it, a realistic/optimistic outlook (production-wise) for Zadina is Pacioretty (35 goal scorer). We can’t even trade Max for a 2nd line centre despite being a PKer, a captain and having a cheap contract.
In other words, if both Zadina and Kotkaniemi reach their potential, you won’t be able to acquire Kotkaniemi by trading Zadina, even if he has the potential to be better. Just looking at it as a Bergevin logic of “assets”.
I don't see the point of your argument.
I don't expect him the player we pick with the 3rd overall to be traded... or at least not until he's 30+ years old.
So comparing the value of the player will have in his prime is useless.
Bouchard is expected to go ~10th, but if he reaches his potential (1D), he should have more value than Zadina. Maybe even more than Svechnikov depending on how he ends up.
But I dont see anyone wanting to pick Bouchard with the 3rd overall pick over Zadina.
The point is the Habs will still be without good centres and have nothing they could trade for one without overpaying with multiple pieces.
Thats way too early to say.
If Kotka does end up a 1C, it will probably in 4-5 years.
A lot can happen during that time.
And you have to also take into account that Kotka is far from guaranteed of ending up a 1C.
Zadina on the other hand has a good chance of being a top 6 forward as soon as next year.
If the habs were that desperate for centers, they would have taken Brown or Jost over Sergachev
I don't see the point of your argument.
I don't expect the player we pick with the 3rd overall to be traded... or at least not until he's 30+ years old.
So comparing the value the player will have in his prime is useless.
Bouchard is expected to go ~10th, but if he reaches his potential (1D), he should have more value than Zadina. Maybe even more than Svechnikov depending on how he ends up.
But I dont see anyone wanting to pick Bouchard with the 3rd overall pick over Zadina.
It will not take Kotkaniemi 4-5 years lol
Can't wait to see Zadina play in a habs jersey
It will not take Kotkaniemi 4-5 years lol
So you think he'll be a #1 C by the age of 20?It will not take Kotkaniemi 4-5 years lol
So you are saying he will be a 1C in the nhl when he is 20 years old?
So you think he'll be a #1 C before he's 22?
Just because you don't see anyone wanting to pick Bouchard with the 3rd overall pick over Zadina doesn't mean people shouldn't want to pick Bouchard over Zadina if they believe it's likely he'll be a #1 dman in the future.
Wingers can obviously have a lot of value and be play drivers and help teams win, but, generally speaking, a good centre or defenseman will have more value (both in terms of trade value and on ice value).
I think le_sean makes a good point about Pacioretty's value and what kind of centre he ever could have garnered in a trade. He was and maybe is an elite winger and what kind of centre could we have ever gotten for him realistically? Wingers still seem to be desirable at the draft but once drafted, how much value do they have? And how much do they really move the needle?
Why not?Value is only important if you think of trading that player.
I dont expect to trade whichever player we draft 3rd overall.
So you think he'll be a #1 C before he's 22?
Why not?
Drouin got traded as a young 3rd overall pick. I wouldn't be surprised if we trade Galchenyuk either.Isn't value important all the time? Things change quickly, you can always convert value into value. Otherwise, you're carrying a built-in loss.
Why not?
We literally just traded for Drouin last year.With the 3rd overall pick, you expect to get a franchise player. Those rarely get traded.