le_sean
Registered User
- Oct 21, 2006
- 42,560
- 46,496
I’d completely understand and would back the decision to draft Kotkaniemi at 3 if they so choose (though I still prefer Zadina). It’s defeating trying to find any type of good centre in a trade. They’ll have to resort to signing Stastny to an albatross contract.
I’d completely understand and would back the decision to draft Kotkaniemi at 3 if they so choose (though I still prefer Zadina). It’s defeating trying to find any type of good centre in a trade. They’ll have to resort to signing Stastny to an albatross contract.
The Habs have a nice quandary picking 3rd OV, any of five prospects between 2nd -6th have very little subtle differences that intrigue this old Habs fan. I can imagine the round table of Hab scouts discussing the pro's & con's of each prospect. How their intangibles will fit with present veterans, will require some serious thinking. Hopefully they get input from Serge Savard whose abilities in finding the right mix, won the Habs last SCC 25 yrs. ago.
Zadina's play in the WJHC's pretty much sealed my opinion about his worth, if available at 3rd OV. Don't be surprised that Carolina picks Filip 2nd OV , having great chemistry with Necas will come into the conversation have no doubt about that.
Regardless the Habs staff are faced with drafting a future star player, none of us have any input as to whose name will be called. Happy I am, that the Habs got J.Drouin last year and a player of similar talent level again this year, it's all good for our future.
Perhaps Columbus will trade Pierre Luc Dubois(C/LW) for our 3rd OV , Adam Boqvist(RHD) could be a great partner for Zach Werenski(LHD), giving them the best Top Four PMD's in the NHL. A deal that can benefit both teams IMHO, that might solve the Habs need for a 1st line center, wishful thinking on a lazy Sunday afternoon.
If Zadina is clearly superior to Kotkaniemi, it would be a mistake in my view to draft him in the third spot. Even if they drafted Kotkaniemi, there's no saying when he'd be ready for the NHL and meantime an elite sniper like Zadina would probably be in a position to help them starting next season. Plus, some have Kotkaniemi with no. 2C upside but no one is saying Zadina is a 2nd line player.
So regardless if they drafted Kotkaniemi, they'd still have to add a top 6C -- they couldn't just bank on him being ready next year. You're still at risk of landing the Stastny albatrosser.
The way I look at it is the prospects from 4-10 are essentially interchangeable. I don’t think anyone would really complain if the Habs ion Dobson at 4, it Wahlstrom at 4 or Kotkaniemi at 4. So really is it that big of a deal if you take that player at 3? If you truly believe the U18 is a sign of things to come and your only viable option at C in the pipeline is Poehling, you have a reason to do it. You’re not getting a centre for Pacioretty, or it would have already happened. So the other option is to trade the 3rd for one, so why not just draft one?
I'd sign off on this right now lol. Every draft wire mock I've seen is too good to be true lolI know draftwired isn't the most reliable simulation engine, but damn if it isn't fun sometimes.
3. Svechnikov
35. Berggren
38. Lundkvist
56. Gustafsson
57. Wise
66. Hillis
97. Shafigullin
102. Zhuravylov
123. Kurashev
128. Morozov
What more could you ask for?
CBJ would not to this. They saw something in Dubois and it's paying off big time. They traded their 1C (Johansen) for a 1D (Jones) and they already have some solid young guy to replace him. There is no way they are gonna trade him for a W.
If 4-10 are interchangeable, where are these Kotkaniemi comments about him having second line C upside coming from? Are they justified?
Also, why don't we ever see Zadina cast in the same light? No one has ever said that Zadina projects as a second line winger.
The way I look at it is the prospects from 4-10 are essentially interchangeable. I don’t think anyone would really complain if the Habs ion Dobson at 4, it Wahlstrom at 4 or Kotkaniemi at 4. So really is it that big of a deal if you take that player at 3? If you truly believe the U18 is a sign of things to come and your only viable option at C in the pipeline is Poehling, you have a reason to do it. You’re not getting a centre for Pacioretty, or it would have already happened. So the other option is to trade the 3rd for one, so why not just draft one?
Then hes not the man for the job.You're thinking and posting like a calm rational human being with no pressure. MB is under the gun. Every move he will make will not involve the same dispassionate outlook that you would take. To save his neck every move he'll make this off season will be for immediate gratification. There will be no long term planning. His team will need to show immediate and dramatic improvement. If he drafts a center in this year's draft he's looking at a two maybe three year wait. The tightening noose around MB's neck will not make him wait that long.
Then hes not the man for the job.
At some point i understand the hate for MB, but if thats really what is going on, the problem is with ownership.
So I am not a Montreal fan but I was trying to figure out what the MTL strategy was going to be on draft day. I ran about a dozen or so simulations and was curious as to if the plan is to trade the #3, use the number 3 and use all the second rounders, or to try to move up with the second into additional firsts. Everytime I run a sim for my team, NYR, Montreal is offering up picks to move up. This was what I thought was one of my better MTL results.
- Canadiens Draft Simulation using: Draftwired (400)
http://www.draftwired.com:8888/apps/dwNHL
Trades:
(28) from NYR for (35, 97, 102)
(32) from BUF for (38, 123, 128)
(63, 89) from MIN for (56)
Picks:
Rd 1 Pk 3 - Andrei Svechnikov (RW) Barrie
Rd 1 Pk 28 - Dominik Bokk (RW) Vaxjo J20
Rd 2 Pk 32 - Jett Woo (RD) Moose Jaw
Rd 2 Pk 57 - David Gustafsson (C) HV71 J20
Rd 3 Pk 63 - Cole Fonstad (RW) Prince Albert
Rd 3 Pk 66 - Niklas Nordgren (RW) HIFK
Rd 3 Pk 89 - Tyler Madden (C) Tri-City
If 4-10 are interchangeable, where are these Kotkaniemi comments about him having second line C upside coming from? Are they justified?
Also, why don't we ever see Zadina cast in the same light? No one has ever said that Zadina projects as a second line winger.
It's not like this the last chance this team will have to draft a potential top center. If anything, next year's crop looks much more promising with tons of very very good centermen. Drafting a top line scoring winger now and a talented center next year will work just fine in building a contender. There's little sense in rushing things and passIng on superior talent for the sake of filling an immediate need.
Kotkaniemi has as high an offensive ceiling as any forward but Svech in this draft.