Nucker101
Foundational Poster
- Apr 2, 2013
- 22,476
- 19,050
buying marian gaborik's houseWhere is this James Neal stuff coming from?
buying marian gaborik's houseWhere is this James Neal stuff coming from?
Just depressing. We have 6 - 8 overpaid borderline AHL/NHL tweeners and we want to add more?Damn it, have these guys not got a clue. Stop trying to speed up the rebuild and clogging it with this ****. we have a ton of talent coming into the system and they keep trying to get asses in the seats ... screw Aquilini , he has made a fortune off of the Canucks, and he worries about trying to get a few bull**** playoff games revenue.
Do you honestly believe these moves (potential) are about playoffs?Just depressing. We have 6 - 8 overpaid borderline AHL/NHL tweeners and we want to add more?Damn it, have these guys not got a clue. Stop trying to speed up the rebuild and clogging it with this ****. we have a ton of talent coming into the system and they keep trying to get asses in the seats ... screw Aquilini , he has made a fortune off of the Canucks, and he worries about trying to get a few bull**** playoff games revenue.
Like that idea... Neal, one year for 7M or so and let Dahlen/Lind/Palmu ripen in Utica. Flip Neal for picks at the TDL and bring up the best of those three kids.
He was seen in Vancouver yesterday/today? Think he was looking at houses
Pretty sure that’s how Edmonton fostered their losing culture. But I dunno.
Watch them sign 4 veteran ideas like last year while claiming young players will play if they earn it
This board will explode if we sign Neal . After them saying we won't be going for big ticket guys
They built a bad team with no D or Goaltending.
All.I raise you 8 and 10.
So Neal, Riley Nash, De Haan, Beagle, Roussel, Schaller....what's next, Tavares, trading for Karlsson, and taking Price and Weber from Montreal?
I like Schaller, but this is just one of those "bottom 6 guy scores random nice goal"
That doesn't really make sense though.That Neal deal may be a move (IF it happens) to try and pry a first rounder etc. out of somebody to position the Canucks for a shot at Jack Hughes @ next years draft.
That doesn't really make sense though.
If Neal is traded it would be to a contender for a 1st which would not qualify for the lottery for Hughes
Was thinking they could take that pick + and trade up to get the #1 'cause we all know the Canucks are never gonna win the lottery. They'll have to put a package together to wheel and deal for Quinn's bro.
I could be wrong, but is there a trade that the team with the 1st overall pick would do that makes any kind of sense for the trading partner?
I've been under the assumption that Hughes is in the same category of players as Dahlen / McDavid etc. Generational talent.
Admittedly it would be tough but you have to have the assets/picks to make the attempt should the opportunity arise...