Amazing Kreiderman
Registered User
- Apr 11, 2011
- 45,075
- 40,935
Elmer had an assist.
Nothing for Kjellberg.
Just report when he gets a point. It's easier
Elmer had an assist.
Nothing for Kjellberg.
Just report when he gets a point. It's easier
If Barron prioritizes his hockey career, he should join Hartford. There's always time for college. He can go at night or after his hockey career. He's obviously able to hold up at the AHL level. He will get better coaching, he will play in twice as many games he'll have the Rangers eye on him.
If Fox declares his intention to become a free agent they have literally no leverage. They'd probably have to accept a mid/late conditional pick or something.
But if he declares to become a free agent, why waste any assets? I go one step further in saying that unless Fox signs this year, it is a waste of assets to trade for him.
Its the opportunity to have him play and get professional experience next season vs 2 years I guess.
What I am saying is that if he is still staying in college after we trade for his rights, it just isn't worth it.
Only sacrifice the assets, if it means he signs his ELC this summer
Weird RD situation for the Rangers though with DeAngelo, Pionk, Shattenkirk, Fox...
on the other hand the only guy of note who shoots right and is in the system is Keane. I'd probably say if they could trade Shattenkirk in the next year and end the Pionk experiment then acquire a bigger but still solid vet RD then they could run with DeAngelo and Fox on the right
But if he declares to become a free agent, why waste any assets? I go one step further in saying that unless Fox signs this year, it is a waste of assets to trade for him.
Perhaps Adam Fox is going to be the Ranger next prospect [...] So what's fair compensation?
If Fox declares his intention to become a free agent they have literally no leverage. They'd probably have to accept a mid/late conditional pick or something.
A pair of seconds and a prospect like Gropp or Gettinger, maybe also a higher prospect like Barron or Rykov if they like Fox enough.
Would people pay our second, Dallas second, Barron and Gettinger for Fox?
Absolutely notA pair of seconds and a prospect like Gropp or Gettinger, maybe also a higher prospect like Barron or Rykov if they like Fox enough.
Would people pay our second, Dallas second, Barron and Gettinger for Fox?
Well I said a conditional pick. The condition would be him signing.But if he declares to become a free agent, why waste any assets? I go one step further in saying that unless Fox signs this year, it is a waste of assets to trade for him.
That's a massive overpayment for a player who doesn't want to sign until he finishes his senior year
A pair of seconds and a prospect like Gropp or Gettinger, maybe also a higher prospect like Barron or Rykov if they like Fox enough.
Would people pay our second, Dallas second, Barron and Gettinger for Fox?