King'sPawn
Enjoy the chaos
- Jul 1, 2003
- 23,211
- 24,143
If you are just speaking cap wise...yes, agreed. But Panarin is a dynamic talent, where if you have to trade a Toffoli to make it work, bye. Trade a Martinez, bye. Trade a Pearson, bye.
It doesn't matter how much Vilardi costs if he doesn't produce.....now he might be produce, but he might not....weighing decisions based on cap and not production is not a good thing.
A responsible GM should weigh both, along with other factors, like organizational direction.
To me, trading Vilardi for Panarin factors in production, but ignores organizational need to have a manageable cap and identifying the right young players to build around. So far, nobody drafted after 2014 has shown the ability to play on the top 6/top 4 or shown some leadership qualities. They need to keep the young assets they can.