eleventy
Conditioner before shampoo
- Jul 4, 2007
- 1,493
- 194
And for the millionth time, Vilardi simply was not available to MTL in any deal involving patches.
JT is in LA already. Might as well give him a tour and whip out DL's old bar graphs/pie charts and hear what he says.
Hahah, $8 million for 8 years for Paches? Lol, now way in heck that deal goes down. Stand pat Blake. That is a disaster contract. I am fine with 6/6, but that is even a stretch.
Even 6 x $6 million for Pacioretty would've been ugly. $8 million a year? LOL good luck with that.
Or you could just hop into a time machine and draft all the stars and build a continuous and nonstop Stanley Cup team to dateSign Tavares.
Trade Carter for Panarin.
Give Gretzky robot legs.
Attach lasers to helmets.
Dynasty.
If the Kings really want another winger I'd rather they take a chance on a low risk UFA like Grabner or Vanek. At least that way they're not giving up assets.
Apparently Rick Nash is considering retirement unless he has a shot at a cup. He might be willing to take a cheap 1 year deal if he thinks the Kings have a shot.
You may feel Patches is worth 8x8 but Blake and many other don't.Then you give up assets on top of it,clear pass on Patches.Someone will over pay to get Patches and he'll get his deal eventually.It's amazing what I am reading, that a perennial 30 goal scorer is now a mid-tier player....
You may feel Patches is worth 8x8 but Blake and many other don't.Then you give up assets on top of it,clear pass on Patches.Someone will over pay to get Patches and he'll get his deal eventually.
No, I wouldn't pay him 8 x 8, but not for the reasons that he's a "mid" tier player, thats asinine. 8 x 8 is too much for his age, but he will get it somewhere, but the asinine reasonings of, "coming off a 37 point season" "hes a mid tier player" is just what i said, asinine, it discounts his STEADY, CONSISTENT body of work....
No, I wouldn't pay him 8 x 8, but not for the reasons that he's a "mid" tier player, thats asinine. 8 x 8 is too much for his age, but he will get it somewhere, but the asinine reasonings of, "coming off a 37 point season" "hes a mid tier player" is just what i said, asinine, it discounts his STEADY, CONSISTENT body of work....
Yup, I think anyone who makes $7 million or more better be able to carry his line or his pair for defenseman. Pacioretty is a really good player and would probably score 27-30 with Kopitar but he's not someone the Kings could put on the 3rd line and expect to carry it.Yeah, I agree with you that comments like that are nonsense. Pachs is a very talented top 6 forward and has shown the ability to score 30 goals consistently. But I would not pay him $8 million. I think the $8 million+ level is for elite players in my book, which Paches is not. Paches is worth between $6-$7 million based on the market, but even if he is worth that, I wouldn't want to pay that cap hit for 7 or 8 years. I would rather pay that money to a young player coming off an entry contract.
Also, if the Kings were open to paying $7 million + for a long term contract, they might as well overpay for a UFA like JVR, and then make the cap work by trading Martinez or other roster players for draft picks and prospects. Getting Paches would require us to not only pay that crazy term and AVV, but also lose assets.
Yup, I think anyone who makes $7 million or more better be able to carry his line or his pair for defenseman. Pacioretty is a really good player and would probably score 27-30 with Kopitar but he's not someone the Kings could put on the 3rd line and expect to carry it.
Yup, I think anyone who makes $7 million or more better be able to carry his line or his pair for defenseman. Pacioretty is a really good player and would probably score 27-30 with Kopitar but he's not someone the Kings could put on the 3rd line and expect to carry it.
No, I wouldn't pay him 8 x 8, but not for the reasons that he's a "mid" tier player, thats asinine. 8 x 8 is too much for his age, but he will get it somewhere, but the asinine reasonings of, "coming off a 37 point season" "hes a mid tier player" is just what i said, asinine, it discounts his STEADY, CONSISTENT body of work....
Repeatedly yelling "asinine" into the aether means nothing. If you could actually read, you would see I wrote that Pacioretty is a mid-tier TOP SIX wing. That's not the same as calling him a "mid tier player." He's simply a tier below the top wings in the game RIGHT NOW.
Here's a list of better wingers off the top of my head:
Patrick Kane
Artemi Panarin
Taylor Hall
Alex Ovechkin
Johnny Gadreau
Jamie Benn
Nikita Kucherov
Phil Kessel
Blake Wheeler
Jake Vorachek
Alex Radulov
Dave Pastrnak
Patrik Laine
You can be as flippant as you want regarding Pacioretty's 37 point season. It's a fact. Brown's stock fell after his first poor season, as did Kopitar's. You can't clamor about STEADY, CONSISTENT BODY OF WORK and then pretend like the 37 point season doesn't exist. This also ignores his poor playoff performances.
If you think Pacioretty is in the tier above, more power to you. You should be his agent. And you're right; some poor team will give him 8x8 and immensely regret it.
...and not in a point-producing way.I’m all for signing Nash to a one year deal. Then we don’t have to **** around with these mid-tier top six wingers who want $8 million a year.
8x8 for Pacioretty is offensive.
LOL, well, off the top of your head, 13 players....out of 62 possible spots....um, ok, and you say he's mid tier...I guess if your tiers for W's are soft...
And absolutely his 37 point season counts, but it doesn't discount his string of SIX 30 goal seasons, (now one was shortened so it would have to be pro-rated, but was on pace) so if you want to be anal, 5 of 6 seasons 30 goal seasons, you seem to discount....because he was injured, and on a really really bad team...
Poor playoff peformances...again...not true, 7 points in 11 games, NOT POOR, 11 points in 17 games, NOT POOR....
Just amazing...
1 goal in his last 10 playoff games and repeatedly called a ghost by the people that watch him consistently. 1 point in 5 games in the Olympics. 0 points in the World Cup.
Not mid-tier, might be good with Kopitar, and he'll probably get the money, but not sure why you're so combative about him getting 8 million. I think he'll be better if he's not "the guy," but he hasn't proven to be a guy who is better with better teammates (like Kessel who seems to do better away from Crosby/Malkin than with--because he has to have the puck), nor has he proven to be a guy to be better when the games matter most. If we're going to throw 8 million at anyone else, I'm glad it's not going to be him.
The more and more I'm seeing prices, the Kovalchuk signing was a smart solid deal by Blake.
(the law of) diminishing returns
phrase of diminish
noun: law of diminishing returns
- 1.
used to refer to a point at which the level of profits or benefits gained is less than the amount of money or energy invested.