I tend to think someone who doesn't have the backbone to call things as they really are (like Jim Fox and his excuses) fits the description of homer.
If the shoe fits...
well, what are things as they really are Ziggy?
I tend to think someone who doesn't have the backbone to call things as they really are (like Jim Fox and his excuses) fits the description of homer.
If the shoe fits...
well, what are things as they really are Ziggy?
I seem to recall a laundry list of excuses being made for the coach and GM who put the team in the position they've been in: two out of three seasons of no playoffs, with a single playoff game won in a quick exit in between.
But I guess those results were satisfactory for you. Funny how the people you label as pessimists (or realists when compared to your clouded thoughts) were proven to be right.
a laundry list of excuses from whom? who is saying the results were satisfactory? lets go back to my first question: what are things as they really are? is this team a contender or is it a dumpster fire in need of a complete rebuild like some people are so sure of?
At some point the Kings were going to be old and trending down. They weren't going to be a young and cheap Cup contender in perpetuity. No matter what Lombardi promised, no matter what Detroit managed to do, no matter what the Yankees did, and no matter how many always think 2 years ahead moves they made.
At some point you have to pay guys because every other team wants young productive players on their ELC's too.
You know there were a number of excuses, and I'll provide that list for you:
- Kopitar must be playing hurt
- Injuries to Quick, Gaborik and Toffoli
- Many new faces in the lineup
- Goaltending was hurting the team (when Budaj was the least of their concerns)
- Exhaustion due to the World Cup
- The schedule
- Bad luck (i.e. hitting posts and unfortunate bounces)
- Inexperienced blueline
- They outshot opponents but couldn't find a way to score
- Sutter is pushing them too hard
We heard those excuses repeatedly, not only from these forums but Jim Fox spouted them during broadcasts as well.
I'm of the opinion that the team is neither a contender nor dumpster fire. They're a middling team that should be good enough to make the playoffs but could also be bad enough to miss them. Hence the return to the black hole that many of us were fretting, but at some point it was bound to happen.
That's what really is the reality of the current state of the team. There's no telltale sign that things will get better until we see some movement and transactions, which I'm sure we'll see take place the closer we approach the expansion draft, entry draft, and free agency.
I'm of the opinion that the team is neither a contender nor dumpster fire. They're a middling team that should be good enough to make the playoffs but could also be bad enough to miss them. Hence the return to the black hole that many of us were fretting, but at some point it was bound to happen.
precisely what I was looking for. cant say I disagree with much though I do think Kopi was hurt, but that doesnt excuse his season. thanks for the honest, objective reply
Or, at some point, like the end of the 2015 season, you recognize the run is over and you act and behave accordingly. That way the organization doesn't flounder around for 4 or 5 years pretending the roster is built for contention when it isn't.
There is no shame in that, it's actually being smart.
Not sure how wanting young, productive players on ELCs means you have to pay guys like Gaborik and Brown, and then hand Kopitar and 8-year deal. What should happen is you ask them to sign reasonable deals, and if they won't, you trade them, or in Gaborik's case let them leave.
If people on this board were actual GMs they would follow the following game plan. Develop team through draft, after a few years identify which players are the best and hold the most value, trade said players for more draft picks since their value wont be higher again, use draft picks to acquire top prospects, wait until prospects develop into valuable players, trade said players for top draft picks, develop those players from the draft, wait until value high, and trade again.
If anyone thinks the Kings should have undergone a rebuild the year after the 2014 win, they need to get their head checked. How do you think that conversation would go between DL and the ownership group?
Dean: Hi this is Dean, incredible how we won the cup two times out of three years isn't it?
Owner: Sure is Dean. Looks like we have most of the team in tact, how great is that? We can go on another run next year!
Dean: Umm, about that. I was actually thinking its time to rebuild the team. Looks like we have some marketable players that we can use for draft picks, which we can use to draft young players that may someday be just as good.
Owner: *scratches head in confusion*
Also shows that Nashville has done quite well at the draft table, without having the luxury of having a number of high draft selections and have hit some home runs outside of the first round.
No GM with an actual GM job takes the team apart after 2015.
I tend to think someone who doesn't have the backbone to call things as they really are (like Jim Fox and his excuses) fits the description of homer.
If the shoe fits...
No GM with an actual GM job takes the team apart after 2015.
But what about all the GMs on HFBoards?
The Lucic deal was probably the worst trade in the history of the franchise.
There is a chasm between "taking the team apart" and making intelligent, forward thinking decisions. Lombardi's big crime was hubris. He believed in his team so much that not only did he not prepare for the flexibility needed in event of failure, he doubled down on it and made it damn near impossible to avoid.
That possibility that the window would close prematurely was very easy to predict in 2015, not just because of missing the playoffs, but because of the sheer number of longterm contract extensions that guaranteed roster stagnation. I don't care how good the message is, you need fresh blood to come in and liven up not only the room, but different players to add different wrinkles to the same system.
It was very easy to see that the failure of 2015 wasn't just due to physical exhaustion, but also apathy. Continued failure was the most likely outcome. And by failure, I don't mean suddenly becoming a lottery team overnight, but in terms of Cup contention ending. So when the Brown extension was offered, some thought it was too damn long for a player who you would have already traded if Nash decided to waive. Signing Gaborik was a major mistake and argued against by the same folks for the same reasons. Too much time for a player known to lose focus who couldn't remain healthy that took him too late into his career
The Lucic deal was probably the worst trade in the history of the franchise. It was known from day 1 that he could never be re-signed, only Lombardi's hubris lead him to think it was possible. That trade strip-mined an already desolate asset list.
That was why so many argued so strongly against Kopitar's ridiculous extension. It was suicide. He HAD to be traded in order to salvage the next half decade from the black hole. He would never be worth that money in years 5-8, and at least the first two would be worthless during a rebuild/retool, whatever you want to call it, because the team clearly can't challenge now. It was so easy to see, but Dean was sure he knew better. He didn't, he was wrong, it cost the team dearly now and for the next few seasons, and it cost him his job.
It was always the most likely outcome, and some of us explained why we thought so thoroughly in 2015.
I suppose we could all deeply inhale the happy gas and believe Mersch is a top sixer, all of the so-called kids on defense who couldn't crack the NHL before age 24 are top four's, etc.
Exactly!
For all the issues we talk about like Voynov, Richards, Brown, Gaborik, Sutter etc. the
The biggest reason the Kings are where they are right now is the lack of success at the draft table, especially in regards to homeruns.
The change in draft strategy is the thing I am most excited about with the management change.