Willy Stylez
Wiff
- Mar 14, 2015
- 3,721
- 654
Klingberg should be there over ekholm
I don't disagree, but I don't have anything against Ekholm being there either, he's solid.
Klingberg should be there over ekholm
how? They have 3 elite defensemen - Karlsson, Hedman, Ekman-Larsson.
Canada had 5 - Keith, Doughty, Weber, Pietrangelo, and Burns. Now we have still 4.
Plus the group of Vlasic, Muzzin, Bouwmeester is better than Hjalmarsson, Stralman, Ekholm/Lindholm
if anything, it got closer, sure, but they are not better and they were certainly not better with us having 5 elite d-men and them 3, but I guess we should have this debate in our thread, haha.
It is too bad we dont see Nylander in the World Cup. Finland has 18 year old Laine, so I dont see why Sweden cant use a young upcoming forward as well.
Kruger is waste of a roster spot anyway.
I'm not so sure that Lindholm stays in Anaheim anymore http://www.hockeysverige.se/2016/08...cup-med-frolunda-far-ta-med-mig-en-inhalator/
He basically calls them 'cheap'
True, but the reasoning he gives is sound.
I think Ekholm is a bit underrated around here. He took really big steps last season, and was amazing in the playoffs.
It is too bad we dont see Nylander in the World Cup. Finland has 18 year old Laine, so I dont see why Sweden cant use a young upcoming forward as well.
Kruger is waste of a roster spot anyway.
I'd only take Forsberg and Bäckström from Sweden.Sure, but Finland's forwards don't have anywhere close to the depth of Sweden.
Nylander would probably make team Finland too.
I'd only take Forsberg and Bäckström from Sweden.
I'd only take Forsberg and Bäckström from Sweden.
Sure, but Finland's forwards don't have anywhere close to the depth of Sweden.
Nylander would probably make team Finland too.
I´d say they have nearly the same depth as Sweden, Nylander would be in the discussion but he wouldn´t make team Finland who snubbed Pulju, Rantanen, Salomäki etc
Laine however would make team Sweden.
"Karlsson to Laine" would be something![]()
Nearly the same depth? Sweden had 17 NHL forwards with 40+ points last year, while Finland had 4.I´d say they have nearly the same depth as Sweden, Nylander would be in the discussion but he wouldn´t make team Finland who snubbed Pulju, Rantanen, Salomäki etc
Laine however would make team Sweden.
"Karlsson to Laine" would be something![]()
I'd only take Forsberg and Bäckström from Sweden.
I'd only take Forsberg and Bäckström from Sweden.
Hehe, yeh man thats your bias.![]()
Yeah no you wouldn't if Landeskog, Eriksson, the Sedin's, Hörnqvist, Steen etc were swedish you're just biased.
For Finland's sake... good thing your not the GM.
I agree. I thought you guys were talking about Alex Nylander making team Finland for a momentSeriously though, I think Nylander would be positive for this team. It needs a young upside among the aging forwards. Let's be honest that Zetterberg and Sedins are both over the hill. Zetterberg was really sad to watch end of the last season.
Seriously though, I think Nylander would be positive for this team. It needs a young upside among the aging forwards. Let's be honest that Zetterberg and Sedins are both over the hill. Zetterberg was really sad to watch end of the last season.
Zetterberg was fantastic at the start of last season, hopefully he can be that player in this tournament. I'm also not worried about the Sedins at all, they carried a terrible team last season with no support whatsoever.
I also like the addition of Rakell, Steen is the superior player but he doesn't fill a big need on this team. Nylander would have been interesting to watch as well, after this season we are all going to wonder why he was never in the discussion.