I didn't say the Canucks roster was better. I'm saying if Ericsson were to go there, he would think that a Canucks roster with him is better than a Canucks roster without him. Why else would they willingly pay him so much?
And nobody would've said the Kings would have fewer playoff wins than the Canucks over the last 2 years back in the summer of 2014. Is it likely the Kings are more of a contender than the Canucks for the next 3 years? Probably. Is that chance worth turning down $18m more dollars? He's not getting that money back if he turns it down, and when he's 55, that money will probably be doing more for him than any Cup ring. That's the choice he has to make.
Sure, there's more than money, but $18m extra dollars is a lot.
The Cups in 2012 and 2014 don't do anything for Ericsson today. He wasn't part of it. The most recent one is 2 years in the past now. You can try to sell him on it, but once again, is that worth $18m more dollars?
It's possible for guys to take less, but Kariya and Selanne didn't win the Cup that year with the Avs, Kariya never got one period, and neither one of them got the money back that they didn't take in their career.
Now, I assume they're both doing just fine in their lives without the money they didn't take back in 2003, but they didn't get the Cup, and they didn't get the money. That's the risk a player takes if they take less.