Grant McCagg
@duhduhduh
- Dec 13, 2010
- 4,032
- 32
I'll be joining @nielsonTSN1260 on @TSN1260 at 6:45am to discuss the draft and who the Oilers may target at #4.
That's pretty surprising.
I thought Laine was closer to Matthews than Pulju was to Laine.
Chia said he doesn't see a no.1 D in this draft.
Looks like it's going to be between Tkachuk and Dubois for that 4 spot.
I'd imagine that puts any discussion of us taking a dman at 4 to bed. The big question is how does he view the others. If he views Tkachuk and Dubois as future 2nd liners, it still makes sense to trade down and take a future #2 dman. If he thinks one or both are future stars, you have to go forward
So are most oilers fans wanting Tkachuck or Dubois?
IMO, DeBrincat is going in the top 15. I don't think he's dropping like some experts suggest.
So... who is the wildcard prospect that could be taken at #2?
Puljujarvi...Tkachuk...Dubois?
Imagine some team goes hog wild over Tkachuk after his Memorial Cup run and trades up to get him... say up to the #2 pick... then another team wants a big C prospect badly and trades up to get Dubois at #3... leaving the Oilers with the fun of choosing between Laine and Puljujarvi at #4
Man this team needs better D badly... I mean I was just reflecting on the fact that let's say the Oilers do acquire Hamonic for example... that's not likely to be THE solution either.
The Isles had Hamonic, Boychuk and Leddy... all are better than anything the Oilers have and still the Isles basically did nothing... I mean yes they made the playoffs but went nowhere when it counted the most.
The Oilers need to acquire at a minimum 2 top 4 dmen to even start moving the needle in the right direction and honestly 3 are almost needed imo as they don't have a top pairing guy right now... all of Klefbom/Sekera/Davidson are basically average to good 3/4 type dmen at best and when you account for the inevitable string of injuries that will likely hit again... well I would rather go "overkill" on acquiring dmen than do the 1-and-done (at best) strategy that this team has employed in the past.
Chia said he doesn't see a no.1 D in this draft.
Looks like it's going to be between Tkachuk and Dubois for that 4 spot.
I mean that's one way to look at it, he said there are definitely #2s, and basically it depends on what you classify as a #1. He said there is a chance they could become one.
I read it as 'there are no Doughty/Hedman, but there might be some Carlson/McDonagh kind of players." So not elite #1's but guys you could argue for the role.
IMO, DeBrincat is going in the top 15. I don't think he's dropping like some experts suggest.
Tkachuk said he'd love to play with McDavid.If they make the pick I think it's going to be Tkachuk. He'll fit great with McDavid and probably is the player the Oilers thought they were getting in Yakupov. It's the safe pick and Chiarelli seems to like him a lot.
He will go 11th to the Devils or they trade down for him . What I suspectHe's in that group after 16. Doubt he knocks anyone out of it. Is he gonna go before McLeod, Bellows or Kunin? Maybe but I wouldn't bet on it
Tkachuk said he'd love to play with McDavid.
I'll be joining @nielsonTSN1260 on @TSN1260 at 6:45am to discuss the draft and who the Oilers may target at #4.
If we're dealing Draisaitl for d-help aside from Subban, Chiarelli better do the smart thing and take Dubois as a future replacement. Dubois is a stronger two-way player than Draisaitl was and plays more of a PF game from the highlights I've seen.
McDavid, RNH, Dubois would be the best comprehensive center core in the conference, second in the league behind the Pens.
Laine come off pretty egotistical at the combine. Maybe he rubbed someone the wrong way. There is not a lot of difference to choose between the top 3 and clubhouse fit may come into it
Can't believe the Oilers would not take Juolevi. It's like this franchise is incapable of making good decision.
Can't believe the Oilers would not take Juolevi. It's like this franchise is incapable of making good decision.