Faelko
Registered User
- Aug 11, 2002
- 12,025
- 5,313
I'm going to be referencing this constantly until Friday.
Question: you project Auston Matthews at 917 games played. If he plays 75 games a season, then that's just over twelve seasons. Given that he's going to be in the NHL next year, that implies he'll be done by age 30 instead of a more 35-38 we've seen from former first overalls.
Why is that? Patrick Stefan bringing the numbers down? If so, why isn't he discounted as an outlier? If no, how can it be remedied?
I'm only OK with Tkachuk if Chiarelli is convinced he has signing Lucic in the bag.....
McDavid, Draisaitl, Hall, RNH, Eberle, Tkachuk....we only have one top-6 forward who plays/can play a heavy game in this division.
We're gonna get chewed out (again) when we go up against Koptiar/Toffoli/Pearson/Carter/Getzlaf/Perry/Rakell/etc
I don't think so. 75 is pretty common.Because I think a player who players 75 games a season is an outlier.
Injuries happen and I think statistically speaking they are more common than not...
When does the draft actually start?
Tkachuk plays a bigger game then Dubois. He's actually the definition of Western Conference winger IMO. Ive said it before but he reminds me a lot of Ryan Smyth. Just simply doesn't stop battling.
So let's get back to the draft talk shall we?
If you look at Bob McKenzies rankings the Oilers could come out of the draft with:
4. Matthew Tkachuk, LW (London Knights, OHL)
32. Pascal Laberge, RW (Victoriaville Tigres, QMJHL)
63. Jonathan Dahlén, LW (Timrå IK, Allsvenskan)
That would be a pretty solid way of adding some much needed prospect depth up front.
Really? I thought Laine was a lock at 2
That's pretty surprising.
I thought Laine was closer to Matthews than Pulju was to Laine.
That's pretty surprising.
I thought Laine was closer to Matthews than Pulju was to Laine.
That's pretty surprising.
I thought Laine was closer to Matthews than Pulju was to Laine.
Oh please it is a little early to be contemplating this. Chiarelli made himself extremely clear that his top priority is fixing the defense. Just because a couple of teams have jumped ahead of the game on some 2nd tier defensemen doesn't mean we're doomed.
There are a handful of teams who were labeled as being the top aggressors this offseason, and none of them have pounced yet. The time right around the draft is when the real action gets started.
normally I would say that this is an exaggeration, but I think this may be the case. It is looking like the Pacific division will be upgrading yet again, and so it's not just that we have to make ground on our poor performance this season, but the bar for success in this division is probably getting raised again, just like last year. They added Gudbranson already, and their GM is very much in win-now mode.
Anaheim lost Andersen, but Gibson is for real. At least Andersen didn't go to Calgary, but the Flames will likely be upgraded in net compared to last season. Also of course the Coyotes added to their defensive depth and will probably be quite aggressive if for no other reason other than to reach the cap floor. Vancouver will probably add a few players.
However, I'm still very confident that we will be one of the most aggressive teams this offseason. We might not get the caliber of upgrades we really want, but the team will revamped. Also, we had a lot of injuries last year. Adding Klefbom is basically like a new player to us. We started winning a lot of games before he got injured. Also, many players emerged for us in the 2nd half. Talbot, Maroon, Davidson, and a few others. If we changed nothing we'd still likely be a fair bit better. Not enough probably, but still.
So... who is the wildcard prospect that could be taken at #2?
Puljujarvi...Tkachuk...Dubois?
Imagine some team goes hog wild over Tkachuk after his Memorial Cup run and trades up to get him... say up to the #2 pick... then another team wants a big C prospect badly and trades up to get Dubois at #3... leaving the Oilers with the fun of choosing between Laine and Puljujarvi at #4
I think it's possible Tkachuk could be ready for the NHL on a 3rd line in 2017-18, but minimum 1 more year of junior.