KingsHockey24
Registered User
- Aug 1, 2013
- 14,633
- 13,497
Seriously... 50 points is Kopitar territory.![]()
I'd be surprised if Vanek signs less than 3M. We all know he's inconsistent but I'm sure one of the 31 teams will overpay for him.
Seriously... 50 points is Kopitar territory.![]()
cmon, hit me with three or four sentences with what you'd do. I do value your opinions and I know you care about this team, I just dont always agree with you.
I think the question is more what would you do with Doughty going forward, because honestly if you trade him you're starting over. And if you're "starting over" but still paying Kopitar and Quick 20 million between them, you're not really starting over, you're the Vancouver Canucks.
One way to gain some flexibility is that Greene is all but guaranteed to go on LTIR next year and they lose Lewis or McNabb in the expansion, just gained $4.2M or more, giving them almost $19M in space (but with only 13 players), obviously Pearson and Toffoli will take up $10M+ of that, plus all of the guys you mentioned as well as Shore and Andreoff need new deals.
And that would be fine. Lombardi once again gave out a legacy contract, this time to Lewis without blinking an eye.
Exactly, a point some seem to not comprehend. There will be no rebuild for years because it makes zero sense to do it half-ass.
Trevor Lewis had more ES goals than Kopitar.
No one should be *****ing about Lewis, AT ALL.
Nah, I get it you would rather have them half-ass it as far as being a true contender.
At a minimum the Kings need to sit down with Doughty this summer and find out where his head is on building around him. You can't lose Doughty AND not get maximum return for him.
Then they need to make the tough moves. Get something for Carter while they can, same with Martinez and maybe Muzzin as well. This team isn't going to compete for a cup in the next few seasons. Maybe trading some of our more valuable assets now allows some decent younger players on ELCs to take another run with Doughty and Kopitar in a few years.
I doubt even that will work though, because I am not expecting Kopitar to be all that in 3 seasons.
Dean really handcuffed this team with the retirement contracts. Doughty may be the one chip Blake has to play which can bring some assets of real value back into the fold.
Trevor Lewis had more ES goals than Kopitar.
No one should be *****ing about Lewis, AT ALL.
Don't take this the wrong way but it seems like all you want to do is cry over spilt milk.
- Trump got elected
- The Kardashians are celebrities
- There will be another Pirates of the Caribbean movie
- Kopitar, Quick, Brown and Gaborik are with us for the duration of their contracts
Accept it. It's not changing, and there's no point going on and on about things that can only be fixed with a DeLorean and some stolen plutonium.
I think the question is more what would you do with Doughty going forward, because honestly if you trade him you're starting over. And if you're "starting over" but still paying Kopitar and Quick 20 million between them, you're not really starting over, you're the Vancouver Canucks.
Good point. And on Hockey Central yesterday, they noted that there was a battle of wills between luc robitaille and Lombardi and their diverse difference in philosophy and Luc won.
I accept it. No reason the Kings have to flail around trying to be something they aren't just because a few players are signed to some bad contracts.
Blake can make moves to make the team better in the future.
They only thing I'll say about Doughty and Toronto is if the kids in Toronto continue to improve it'll be hard fitting all of them plus Doughty's contract plus filling out a competitive team under 1 cap.
You're constantly dodging the question here. What good does it do to trade valuable players (like Carter and Doughty) when the team will still be hamstrung by Kopitar, Quick, and Brown's contracts?
This team is set, for better or worse, for the next decade. Doughty and Carter aren't going anywhere unless they want to. Obviously, if Doughty is done in LA, then you look into trade options. But no GM on planet earth willingly trades their franchise once in a generation defenseman while simultaneously strapped to other lifetime contracts. As others have pointed out, you're Vancouver at that point.
What do you expect to get in a Doughty trade? Do the sum of those assets ever make the same impact as a prime years Doughty?
The only way Doughty leaves this team is if he wants to. This is crazy talk.
This. People act like the young teams getting better are doing so in a vacuum, but they're subject to the cap as well; if they start enjoying some success, they're gonna get paid too. Tampa is already coming up on that, for example. It's easy to surround McDavid with talent before you have to pay him; what's gonna happen on his next contract? They've gotta do something with Lucic, Eberle, mayyyybe RNH; and they STILL don't really have their D solved. Matthews is gonna get paid, as are the other youngsters; Gardiner and Reilly are not the answers they need either. A lot of people want to pretend other teams don't have issues. And now that their expectations are to get better in the playoffs, they're not just gonna sit on their thumbs with their prospects.
Toronto's got a fanstastic young team on offense but their D is a mess and their goaltending questionable. They're going to have to pay their offense that's performing, as well as some others to fix up the D and Goaltending. And then? They'll be in the same boat as the other successful teams, trying to find creative solutions for cap management.
People act like Toronto can't sacrifice one of Marner or Nylander and still not be a cup contender if they also have the best defenseman on the planet. Toronto is going to have to balance out there top six and their top four. They have the assets to do it.
Same holds true for Edmonton. Think they are going to hold on to Eberle and Nugent-Hopkins? The Oilers are already on their way to striking a balance between their top six and top four.
This. People act like the young teams getting better are doing so in a vacuum, but they're subject to the cap as well; if they start enjoying some success, they're gonna get paid too. Tampa is already coming up on that, for example. It's easy to surround McDavid with talent before you have to pay him; what's gonna happen on his next contract? They've gotta do something with Lucic, Eberle, mayyyybe RNH; and they STILL don't really have their D solved. Matthews is gonna get paid, as are the other youngsters; Gardiner and Reilly are not the answers they need either. A lot of people want to pretend other teams don't have issues. And now that their expectations are to get better in the playoffs, they're not just gonna sit on their thumbs with their prospects.
Toronto's got a fanstastic young team on offense but their D is a mess and their goaltending questionable. They're going to have to pay their offense that's performing, as well as some others to fix up the D and Goaltending. And then? They'll be in the same boat as the other successful teams, trying to find creative solutions for cap management.