But that has no bearing on anything.
Joe is 34-35 doing what he's doing. Without having to look at the past or the future, Brad Richards is 34-35 and worse.
Brad was 31(?) when we signed him. If you're 34-35 playing as good as Joe Thornton is, it's much less likely that you'll hit a rapid decline, ESPECIALLY when you'd come into a situation where you're playing weaker competition.
The Rangers don't have the assets nor the team composition that makes trading for Joe likely, but you guys are severely underrating him even if he is an *******.
edit- I know what he was saying. What you guys are missing is that Joe Thornton has always been better than Brad Richards, and if he's doing what he's doing at 34 instead of 30 he's much more likely in the mold of MSL than Brad Richards.