OHLTG
Registered User
Windsor went 3-3 against London this year. Tell me how beating them in the first round is "supreme silly talk."
Schiefele played 45 games, Camara played 50, Ekblad played 54, Lepkowski played 60. We were down top 3 d-men for between 25-30 games!
Okay, please show me which teams missed their top 3 d-men for 25-30 games. I'd love to see. Or should I go do the research myself?
I'm not trying to come across as a jacka$$, but I really believe this team would have made noise in the playoffs if we hadn't lost Sieloff, Koekkoek, and Posa (one of those "wish we hadn't done this" moves). This isn't a "you're second last...no matter what" attitude won't work.
You watch too much wrestlingWindsor went 3-3 against London this year. Tell me how beating them in the first round is "supreme silly talk."
You're really coming off as disingenuous Kanuck trying too hard to ridicule others and prop up Barrie. You're no different than a lot of London fans.
Windsor went 3-3 against London this year. Tell me how beating them in the first round is "supreme silly talk."
Because they went 3-3 against them last year and finished 8th and we saw what happened.
fine by meGoing by that theory, we're going to be 9th for the rest of our history.
Going by that theory, we're going to be 9th for the rest of our history.
Are you intentionally trying to be naive or does it come to you naturally?
Are you trying to be negative about everything you can, or does it come naturally?
My apologies...I should have known that believing a team that went 3-3 against London this season would have no chance in anything of winning a series against them in the playoffs.
Is that what you were looking for??
I will put it in perspective to you. Why was it Sarnia and Saginaw fans did not believe they could make a big run in the playoffs but you thought Windsor could make noise? It's ironic the teams that made the playoffs as 7th and 8th seed didn't think they could make a run but you thought Windsor could. I am sure something like that is totally lost on you.
This team, with Sieloff, Koekkoek, and Posa, and a healthy Marchese, could have beaten both Saginaw and Sarnia.
That said, if we had those three (excluding Posa) in the line-up all second half, it's not unreasonable to think we'd be higher than 8th, like 6th or even 5th. I know, I know...how dare I have optimism that this team could have done well. Silly naive me.
Your mo is to take ridiculous stances. Fact of the matter is you are what your record says you are. Windsor finished below .500 and missed the playoffs. You can talk about ifs and buts and candy and nuts. You talk about finishing ahead of Sarnia but if they had Galchenyuk and Murphy all year they would have finished better than 7th. See how easy that was?
Your mo is to take ridiculous stances. Fact of the matter is you are what your record says you are. Windsor finished below .500 and missed the playoffs. You can talk about ifs and buts and candy and nuts. You talk about finishing ahead of Sarnia but if they had Galchenyuk and Murphy all year they would have finished better than 7th. See how easy that was?
Your mo is to take ridiculous stances. Fact of the matter is you are what your record says you are. Windsor finished below .500 and missed the playoffs. You can talk about ifs and buts and candy and nuts. You talk about finishing ahead of Sarnia but if they had Galchenyuk and Murphy all year they would have finished better than 7th. See how easy that was?
Wds and Barrie as it stands now both have only 18 year old starters which usually does not occur in Mem Cup scenarios,
The last two OHL hosts had 18 year old starters at the beginning of the season (Mississauga - Anderson, Kitchener - Unice). Ironically, the last OHL host to enter the season without an 18 year old start was, wait for it, the London Knights. Will it be three in a row, or will the Knights break the cycle again?
So you truly believe that, if we had Koekkoek, Sieloff, Bateman (forgot he was injured), and Marchese for all season we'd still have finished 9th? If me being optimistic is a "ridiculous stance", what is being negative all the time? Sure isn't any better.
You say without the injuries they could have finished 5th or 6th. To finish 6th that would mean making up 17 points to equal the Soo. Or 5th which would mean making up 23 points to equal Guelph. This is what I mean when I said ridiculous stance. It's one thing to say that a few more wins they get in the playoffs but to think injuries cost this team a 5th or 6th seed? You're the lone ranger on that one and going out a thin branch.
Note I said usually,and btw neither Missy or Kitchener with Anderson and Unice
right?
Hey Guys,
enjoy the back and forth dialogue. Very interesting.
I think that Branch may have no choice but to give it to London, and only by process of elimination. Windsor may be a worse team next year, and Barrie may lose too many of their high end players. London will have a top team, with a money making operation for the OHL.
I'm interested in learning about why you think that Windsor may have a worse team next season.