LaffyTaffyNYR
Registered User
- Feb 25, 2012
- 17,113
- 2,662
if the Rangers were to sign Hayes, would that put us at 50 contracts?
I at least know a defenseman on the top pair of an AHL team at the age of 22 is not "heading towards bust status".
if the Rangers were to sign Hayes, would that put us at 50 contracts?
Read the 1st post in the thread
We are at 47 contracts right now and John Moore is still unsigned putting us at 48.
This does not include Graves or Duclair.
There is however some uncertainty regarding if Anthony Duclairs contract will be allowed to slide or not this year. Different view have been posted in the Bourque signing thread so that kind of contradicts what some beat writers have said that his contract will be able to slide.
So we are at 48 or 49 SPCs as of now, depending on Duclairs status and assuming John Moore signs
Talbot, Stempniak, Glass and D. Boyle are all NCAA guys too.
Yeah I'd say McI probably has a better breakout pass than, say, Girardi or Klein, to be perfectly frank. That's an underrated part of his game. He's got a surprisingly good first pass
the Dale Purinton days are gone. The Rangers do not need a defenseman to skate for 6-8 minutes per night because his only attribute is fighting. I don't mind fighting. I love physical hockey. But if the kid isn't up to the NHL challenge, aside from being an NHL-level pugilist, he doesn't belong with the NHL club.
Yes.if the Rangers were to sign Hayes, would that put us at 50 contracts?
Knowledge is power.
I've defended McIlrath before. You left out that I acknowledged that defensive first defensemen take longer to develop. Through no fault of his own though he is behind in his development and the Rangers may not have time to wait for him, especially if Miller busts.
You've missed my point that he is a tradable asset. The Rangers have very few of these. If the Rangers need an offensive upgrade I guarantee his name gets floated. Depth chart wise, he won't be a top 4 defenseman for at least the next two years while Boyle is here. Klein is a necessity because of his ability, consistency and contract and Girardi is going no where. So do you wait 2 years for McIlrath to be ready if the Rangers are offensively floundering? That would be horrendous asset management.
I hope McIlrath plays awesome at the AHL and forces his way into the lineup ASAP, but if he doesn't make the leap, or fails with the addition responsibility, then you have a player who yes, is on his way to being a bust, at least in terms of perception. If he outplays Klein that is great for the Rangers, but if not McIlrath has more trade value than Klein. I don't think the Rangers have time to wait for McIlrath if the offense sputters.
How much do you think he's worth in a trade? I'd rather just keep him and see how he pans out.
I also don't see what Dan Boyle has to do with McIlrath "being ready".
And how does McIlrath have more trade value than Klein?
Is there factual evidence that defensive dmen take longer to develop, or is it something that everyone has bandwagon'd on?
It probably has to do I with them filling out their bodies and all.
If I was Hayes and was in this position, I would do the same thing. It's a business. You go where you think you will be paid the most and have the best opportunity to grow and prove your skills.
Yeah, that's true. I never really took $$ into account and I should have. I suppose he'll certainly have an easier time hitting bonuses if he actually makes the NHL![]()