Beerz
Registered User
- Jun 28, 2011
- 36,349
- 12,534
Yeah, this is why I'm trying to figure out which team is the home team.
I read Canada "home" team.
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=744492&navid=DL|NHL|Microsite-NHLNetwork
Yeah, this is why I'm trying to figure out which team is the home team.
Yeah, the dislike for them was overblown. Focusing too much on the character of 17-18 year olds isn't the best idea, IMO. Kids are immature. I know I wouldn't have wanted my career prospects hindered by my actions at 16-18. I got crucified in here before the draft for wanting DeAngelo at 31 if he was still there.
Two of the better GM's in the league (Yzerman, Bowman) weren't scared off by the perceived character issues--and in Chicago's case, they traded up for Schmaltz--and they'll probably reap the rewards at some point.
I'm still not 100% sold on DeAngelo. He has undeniable talent, but he seems to use his talent to bail him out of trouble that he shouldn't have gotten into in the first place, and he over-plays the puck for no reason. Almost like he's showing off. I'm sure good coaching can help him break his bad habits, but he's not my favorite type of player. Granted, I haven't watched him play a ton of games, so I could be completely off on this.
Yeah, the dislike for them was overblown. Focusing too much on the character of 17-18 year olds isn't the best idea, IMO. Kids are immature. I know I wouldn't have wanted my career prospects hindered by my actions at 16-18. I got crucified in here before the draft for wanting DeAngelo at 31 if he was still there.
Two of the better GM's in the league (Yzerman, Bowman) weren't scared off by the perceived character issues--and in Chicago's case, they traded up for Schmaltz--and they'll probably reap the rewards at some point.
I'm not very familiar with Schmaltz's game, but DeAngelo wouldn't have been my favorite pick even if he didn't seem like a scuzzball off the ice. Undeniably has offensive talent, but he also has major, glaring weaknesses elsewhere in his game.
I think we sometimes focus too much on what players cannot do rather than looking at what they can do well. We have several jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none young defensemen (e.g., Pysyk and McCabe). DeAngelo feasting on O-zone starts (by the time he arrived, I'd imagine we're a good possession team, especially if we get one of McEichel) and the PP would be a good thing.
Meh. PPQBs who can't play top 4 defense don't really matter to a Cup picture. Either your best defensive players can run the point or they can't and you have to junk something together.I think we sometimes focus too much on what players cannot do rather than looking at what they can do well. We have several jack-of-all-trades-master-of-none young defensemen (e.g., Pysyk and McCabe). DeAngelo feasting on O-zone starts (by the time he arrived, I'd imagine we're a good possession team, especially if we get one of McEichel) and the PP would be a good thing.
Looks like a steal there, he is scary goodGreat game, Ehlers is a whole lot of fun to watch.
The people who wanted to defer the NYI to 2015 instead of drafting Ehlers look silly now. And yes I realize that argument is also silly given we had no control over it but it I honestly think Ehlers could be as good as Drouin.
Denmark/Switzerland just played the most entertaining game of the tournament thusfar. That was spectacular.
The people who wanted to defer the NYI to 2015 instead of drafting Ehlers look silly now. And yes I realize that argument is also silly given we had no control over it but it I honestly think Ehlers could be as good as Drouin.
The whole point was the risk/reward element. Even the most ardent supporters of the Isles in the discussion like Zip weren't expecting them to be this successful (I don't believe) .. Eastern teams have taken a step back imo and has helped contribute to their climb.
Everyone saw them as a bubble team at best..not a conference leader. I have no problems with wanting the 2015 pick.. I think the possible rewards were to great not to take a risk.