Fitzy
Very Stable Genius
- Jan 29, 2009
- 36,338
- 24,106
So do we inquire about Burmistrov?
Now that we're keeping Richards, it seems less likely.
Just about any move seems less likely with Richards.
So do we inquire about Burmistrov?
Now that we're keeping Richards, it seems less likely.
Just about any move seems less likely with Richards.
So the Rangers roster shakes out as this:
Hagelin-Stepan-Nash
MZA-Brassard-Callahan
Pyatt-Boyle-Dorsett
Kreider-Richards-Asham
McDonagh-Girardi
Staal-MDZ
Moore-Stralman
I see one average 1rst line, an average/below average 2nd line and 2 4th lines. The defense is good though. Should make for some nice low scoring games.
Nice.
I see something like this;
Kreider- Stepan- Nash
Richards- Brassard- Callahan
Hagelin- Boyle- Dorsett
AHL ****- AHL ****- AHL ****
Either way it doesn't look good for us next year. I'm hoping for the best though.
Eric Stephens @icemancometh 36s
@DarrenDreger reported that Lecavalier camp looking at five years, $5 million per. Murray said too much for him on both.
Eric Stephens @icemancometh 36s
@DarrenDreger reported that Lecavalier camp looking at five years, $5 million per. Murray said too much for him on both.
You'd think he'd be okay with $1 million a year since he's getting paid for the next 14 years regardless if he plays or not.
Show me a prominant player--who hadn't been exiled to the minors--who agreed to that kind of salary after being bought out.
Eric Stephens @icemancometh 36s
@DarrenDreger reported that Lecavalier camp looking at five years, $5 million per. Murray said too much for him on both.
Way too high of a cap hit.
I wasn't exactly serious.
$5 million per year for five years is ridiculous for a player like Lecavalier. I think he'll get it because teams will bid for him.
It's all about supply and demand--Lecavalier is not yet 35, so there are no issues there and is pretty much the best center available for cash only. He could definitely make a team better down the middle. Someone will take a chance--maybe not for 5 years, but 3-4 easy.
Is Burmistrov really so good at center that he will force either Richards or Brassard to the wing? He doesn't seem that great on faceoffs, doesn't have a lot of points--is his potential that of a shutdown center or is there something more there?
Haven't seen him enough to really understand the continuing fascination with him.
Is Burmistrov really so good at center that he will force either Richards or Brassard to the wing? He doesn't seem that great on faceoffs, doesn't have a lot of points--is his potential that of a shutdown center or is there something more there?
Haven't seen him enough to really understand the continuing fascination with him.
the idea is he would play the shutdown 3C role that AV wants to have. Which Brass and Richie are incapable of doing.
He's good in his own end, and has the chance to develop into a good two way player, with a ceiling of 2nd line center, though realistically I think he's more along the lines of an Anisimov, capable of playing as a tweener, but best served as 3c on a deep team. He can be cost effective if he doesn't bolt to the KHL, and could be part of a great two way, high energy, scoring third line. It's a buy low, hope for the best kind of trade.
Thanks--but is it really a buy low situation if the price is Del Zotto?
Not as a one for one swap, not in this lifetime. There has to be more coming, and I'd take a good long look at a prospect like Redmond, good shot, good size and skating ability, right handed offensive Dman. He could possibly replace Del Zotto's production in his first season, and if not is likely to come close. Would love to see him paired with Moore.