Nopuckluck
Registered User
- Dec 29, 2017
- 1,319
- 710
Game should have been 5-0 Rangers after 2. When you can’t even score in a whorehouse you have problems
I wasn't talking about those players but yes they along with staal have also been bad on the year, but I think most people agree they have not been good. With Pionk it doesn't matter what he does there will always be people defending him tooth and nail. I would love to be wrong in this situation but pionk has just not been good enough
So i cant criticize how a player plays because he's a rookie? That's ridiculous.
I hope I'm wrong about this I really am but he has not been good enough this year outside of the scoresheet and a ridiculously beautiful goal.
Eh, if the shoe fits.
I’m still not really sure what rah rah synopsis you’re talking about, or where you’re going with the signing thing.
Should we schedule another session...or three, son?
I dont even know what you guys are beefing over but that gif is too funny.![]()
I dont think he should be benched and or scratched. Now that Tony Deangelo is getting regular ice time there really isn't anyone who I believe Pionk is taking ice time away from. And I believe he can be a solid player if he puts it all together, he just hasnt yet.You are not wrong. He's done some good things and some bad things. Probably more bad than good but there's a difference between calling out certain plays and ridiculously bashing the kid and wanting him benched, scratched etc. This is what happens when you rebuild. You give kids every opportunity to succeed.
I dont think he should be benched and or scratched. Now that Tony Deangelo is getting regular ice time there really isn't anyone who I believe Pionk is taking ice time away from. And I believe he can be a solid player if he puts it all together, he just hasnt yet.
My problem is People look at the score sheet and see his highlight reel goal and think hes fine, but there are real problems with his game especially defensively. In a year or two he may fixes all these issues and be fine but rn he does quite a few things wrong.
Now playing with a walking pylon in Staal doesnt help, but there should be atleast some blame on the side of Pionk.
I'm thinking your shoe just might actually fit over your big head entirely and you should really just save the amateur session for someone that buys into that BS, JR.
The rah rah synopsis is about your positive outlook on every single move this team makes no matter how absurd it may be.
Funny..You're the last person I ever expected to get into it with since we joined nearly the same time.
Hell..I probably even joined before you since the join dates are screwed up.
Oh well..I'm over it lol.
Nite nite![]()
Well, I think you proved my point better than I could’ve. So in that sense, thank you.
As for the rah, rah. I pegged the team to finish in the bottom 5-7 in the league, so I guess that could be considered an endorsement for the tanking approach?
For the record, if there is one, I wasn’t thrilled with the ADA handling earlier, am not thrilled with the Chytil/Andersson approaches now. I’ve spoken about my dislike for a number of moves over the years, which is pretty well documented.
Other confessions - something about Kevin Hayes makes me want to jab him in the forehead, I can’t wait until Marc Staal is off the team, I think David Quinn will not lead this team during its next window, I’m not as high on Hajek as some, I think the defense is one of the weakest in the NHL, I think the Rangers should’ve made sure the second pick from Tampa was a first if the team made the ECF and/or Miller and McD were resigned, and I believe in the lone gunman theory.
But that’s the road I travel. Too negative for the “this is actually a good team” crowd, too positive for the “this franchise is boned, management is going to screw this up, they’re doing this all wrong” crowd.
I think we both expect this team to finish poorly. Near as I can figure the difference is that you think they’re only going to screw it up anyway.
As for your last point, I doubt you joined before me, if only because I was writing for the site under the original owners back in 1997. Not that it really matters, nor am I sure what that has to do with...anything really.
But if you were here before me, that’s cool too. I offer both my congratulations and my condolences and I’m sure we’ve both lost years off our lives that we can never get back thanks to this wonderful little social experiment started by the Taylor Brothers during the Clinton Administrstion.
BTW.. My Al Bundy avatar is so much cooler than your Kevin Hayes looking muppet
Well, I think you proved my point better than I could’ve. So in that sense, thank you.
As for the rah, rah. I pegged the team to finish in the bottom 5-7 in the league, so I guess that could be considered an endorsement for the tanking approach?
For the record, if there is one, I wasn’t thrilled with the ADA handling earlier, I am not thrilled with the Chytil/Andersson approaches now, and there are several decisions I’ve disagreed with. Beyond that, I’ve spoken about my dislike for a number of moves over the years, which is pretty well documented.
Other confessions - something about Kevin Hayes makes me want to jab him in the forehead, I can’t wait until Marc Staal is off the team, I think David Quinn will not lead this team during its next window, I’m not as high on Hajek as some, I think the defense is one of the weakest in the NHL, I think the Rangers should’ve made sure the second pick from Tampa was a first if the team made the ECF and/or Miller and McD were resigned, and I believe in the lone gunman theory.
My head is big, size 7 1/2 cap, and I typically don’t wear shoes on my head. I have been known to occasionally wear ladies thongs on my head and pretend I’m a luchador named The Shocker. But only alternating Thursdays, or months with 31 calendar days. There’s a hand gesture that goes with my luchador gimmick, but that’s another story.
Sadly, that’s the road I travel. Too negative for the “this is actually a good team” crowd, too positive for the “this franchise is boned, management is going to screw this up, they’re doing this all wrong” crowd.
I think we both expect this team to finish poorly. Near as I can figure the difference is that you think they’re only going to screw it up anyway.
As for your last point, I doubt you joined before me, if only because I was writing for the site under the original owners back in 1997. Not that it really matters, nor am I sure what that has to do with...anything really.
But if you were here before me, that’s cool too. I offer both my congratulations and my condolences and I’m sure we’ve both lost years off our lives that we can never get back thanks to this wonderful little social experiment started by the Taylor Brothers during the Clinton Administration.
Don’t let the goal fool you. Shattenkirk has been pretty useless in the offensive zone ever since he got here.Pionk takes the wrong man and reads the play wrong on the 2nd goal, fine, whatever, it's a set play. Shattenkirk can't get the puck out because he's stupid and useless outside the offensive zone? It is what it is. Smith getting Datsyuked because he's completely careless and unaware is what should get him benched.
Pionk is the new Rozsival. Discuss.
Detroit would have rather lost that game
Anyway, Gorton either tell Quinn to play Andersson and Chytil more or send them to Hartford
Stop with this bull****
2 of all times...that's like....double all time....This entire game and the result could not have been less surprising. Jimmy Howard is the WOAT Ranger fan of all time.
It’s hard to put a number on it. But I’d like to see Chytil get at least three or four shifts per period. So 12 ish mins, I guess, would be ideal. But I am happy to give Quinn the benefit of the doubt and see where Chytil is in Feb., Mar.I think....more goes into development, than playing your rookies 17 mins a night.
I think 6, 7, 9, etc is too low...but 12 to 13 is just fine.
Just to play devil's advocate here: tonight he had four shifts in the first and second period, three in the third.It’s hard to put a number on it. But I’d like to see Chytil get at least three or four shifts per period. So 12 ish mins, I guess, would be ideal. But I am happy to give Quinn the benefit of the doubt and see where Chytil is in Feb., Mar.