Thanks for your opinion and your weak attempt at condescending me; but if you stop and actually break them down, we get good value in a rebuild.
Kessel (1st line RW) and Bozak (3C scoring)
for
Filip Forsberg (Probable 2nd line RW, 1st line upside) - equivalent to a top 10 pick
Marcus Johansson (Probable 2A-1B centreman) - equivalent to a top 5-10 pick
Tom Wilson (Project) - equivalent to a mid first value
and Lupul an 'older' player who could easily regress a large amount this year, who has yet to prove that he is a consistent first line player, for the same value as a mid first (Tomas Jurco) and a 2nd (Martin Frk). I mostly do this because I love Jurco as a prospect.
Kessel will not get moved unless its for a MASSIVE overpayment!
Example
Chicago: 1st + 1st + McNiell
Philly: 1st + Couturier
Pitt: 1st + 1st + Morrow
and so on....
All 3 of those are pretty bad.
All of those firsts will be 25-30ish
Only in TO would everyday involve a trade for the sixth best scorer in the NHL. Reminds me of all those years we undervalued soft Sundin.
All 3 of those are pretty bad.
All of those firsts will be 25-30ish
Lol. You don't trade a consistent 30 goal, ppg guy for a bunch of "probables". Especially when that guy is 25 years old with a decade of similar production left. Kessel would still be part of our core when guys we draft in 2020 are ready to contribute.
Sure Lupul "could easily regress" he also "could easily continue to produce" at the same level he did last year. His injuries are behind him, he was a top pick for a reason with huge upside. The only way I entertain trading Lupul is in a deadline deal for a big package if he won't sign an extension.
Prospects are rated far too highly on this board. You don't trade proven young assets for unproven guys with ceilings the same level as the current players unless you're trying to completely rebuild.
We've got a good core in place, and tons of expiring contracts. These guys we have now will still be in their prime when players we have drafted or are about to draft are ready for the NHL
Kessel seems like he's still happy playing here based on his latest interview:
http://video.mapleleafs.nhl.com/videocenter/console
everyone's talking about the getz and perry, but nathan horton is also coming off contract. We could use a big bruising winger on the second line. Kully isn't small but he doesn't play big either. Could inject some points and muscle into the line-up for not that much cap.
I suppose a 4 year deal worth 3.5-4m a year?
I know he's had concussion problems but he seemed to bounce back quite well previously. Thoughts, hfb?
Phil's such a nice guy lol. I wouldn't trade him aside from a huge over payment.
He honestly seems like he just wants to win, regardless of how he does. He mentioned that he had a few bad stretches, and that he probably should have got to 40, but that it doesn't matter because it's never good enough when you don't make the playoffs.
I didn't know that Kessel works out down the street from me![]()
Not that I wanna trade for Horton, but the Kaberle trade turned out pretty nicely for us.
I love how every time someone trashes a trade proposal its because the player we are trying to trade is "undervalued". No one here thinks Kessel sucks. We actually think he is extremely talented, which is why we would trade him; because of the value of what we could get back. Wanting to trade Kessel has nothing to do with undervaluing him, we merely except the fact that he has MORE value to another team than he has to OUR team. He needs to play with a first line center. He can't be the best player on a team. He can't be the highest paid player on a team. His greatest asset is as a supporting piece. If we can trade him to a team NEEDING an elite supporting piece, for a player who would thrive as the best player on our team, you do it, no matter how many points Kessel has scored in the last 3 years. Then, you use the next draft to find the elite supporting piece to replace Kessel and support our new star, or trade for him as well.
Teams Phil would be perfect on Does that team have what we need?
Minnesota - Parise is the star Yes - Granlund projects to be that star
Pittsburgh - Crosby is the star No - Unless the are willing to part with Malkin
New York Isles - Tavares is the star No
Tampa Bay - Stamkos is the star No
Colorado - Landeskog is the star Yes - Duchene projects to be that star
Flyers - Giroux is the star Yes - Couts projects to be that star
Personally, I would only trade Kessel for 5 players: From the above...Granlund, Duchene, and Couts. Teams I didn't mention, but have players who they are having trouble signing...Evander Kane or Jamie Benn. Other than that, I would not trade Kessel.
Everyone seems so sure that re-signing Lupul will be a good idea. I'm not so certain he'll ever have another season like the one he just had. Either way, it'll be incredibly risky.
http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/01/14/maloney-seeking-center-for-coyotes/
Supposingly coyotes r interested in lombardi. I honestly like him as a player but I hope he gets traded and make room for kadri